![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | alternatives I would like to hear from users of foldershare as to what alternatives are out there. Notwithstanding the Foldershare team's efforts, it seems that Foldershare isn't a priority for Microsoft. I can't imagine a situation where Google would say, "hey we are down for 48 hours for maintenance". This just doesn't fly. Obviously they don't have the resources to keep this awesome application running 24/7/365, which is disappointing. By as much as a fan that I am, I have to face facts and move on to something else. Readers please suggest alternatives with pros and cons. Thanks in advance. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | RE: alternatives After two years of using FolderShare, I am trying BeInSync. I am using the paid "Business" version of BeInSync. To make things easier for it, I manually transferred all of the files so all of the machines (4 of them) would have an identical copy of the data to start. Everything is on a LAN behind a router using NAT. The data is about 7,000 files totalling 3.8 Gb. Initial impressions after a day (!) of trying to get it to work: (1) It does not like to get too much work at once. I tried to set up four computers at once with all of the data, and all of the computers showed huge backlogs of data to synchronize that looked like they would never finish. Rebooting caused the backlogs to double, so that was definitely a bad idea. I uninstalled and started over adding computers one at time and letting each one fully sync. (2) It does not sync nearly as smoothly as FolderShare There are often long delays before a file syncs, and some files for no apparent reason do not get updated until you kick them again by renaming or moving them. This is of course a big problem, but I am hoping (probably foolishly) that it will go away once I have it up and running. (3) The amount of synchronization activity seems to go up very fast as the number of computers involved goes up. With just two computers, it was pretty quick. When I added the 4th computer, it took a very long time to get it synced. (4) It crashes surprisingly often. I have seen four crashes so far today. (5) The automatic backup feature is nice and seems to work well. The encryption feature is *disabled* by default, so you will want to change this in the options before you back up the data. (6) One of the benefits of the more expensive "Business" version is supposed to be telephone support, but if they have a U.S. telephone number, I couldn't find it on the web site. (7) One reason for the slow performance might be that it wants me to change our router settings to set up port forwarding on port 5584, which they recommend "for best performance", although there is no indication of how important this is. The problem is, they require a separate dedicated port for *each* computer, and they all have to be configured in the router, and each computer needs its dedicated port assignment specified in the settings. This means that every time you move computer, get a different IP address, or just connect through a different network (i.e., wireless), you have to go into your port settings. (Their article is here: http://www.beinsync.com/firewall_nat_settings.php). Having to jump through these kinds of hoops to connect through a NAT router is insane. Overall, pretty disappointing. "pbx" wrote: Quote: > I would like to hear from users of foldershare as to what alternatives are > out there. Notwithstanding the Foldershare team's efforts, it seems that > Foldershare isn't a priority for Microsoft. I can't imagine a situation > where Google would say, "hey we are down for 48 hours for maintenance". This > just doesn't fly. Obviously they don't have the resources to keep this > awesome application running 24/7/365, which is disappointing. By as much as > a fan that I am, I have to face facts and move on to something else. Readers > please suggest alternatives with pros and cons. Thanks in advance. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | RE: alternatives You must not use Blogger! "pbx" wrote: Quote: > I would like to hear from users of foldershare as to what alternatives are > out there. Notwithstanding the Foldershare team's efforts, it seems that > Foldershare isn't a priority for Microsoft. I can't imagine a situation > where Google would say, "hey we are down for 48 hours for maintenance". This > just doesn't fly. Obviously they don't have the resources to keep this > awesome application running 24/7/365, which is disappointing. By as much as > a fan that I am, I have to face facts and move on to something else. Readers > please suggest alternatives with pros and cons. Thanks in advance. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | RE: alternatives Wow! What a lot of negative points compared to a running version of foldershare... -- Zimmermann "d9kt" wrote: Quote: > After two years of using FolderShare, I am trying BeInSync. I am using the > paid "Business" version of BeInSync. To make things easier for it, I > manually transferred all of the files so all of the machines (4 of them) > would have an identical copy of the data to start. Everything is on a LAN > behind a router using NAT. > > The data is about 7,000 files totalling 3.8 Gb. > > Initial impressions after a day (!) of trying to get it to work: > > (1) It does not like to get too much work at once. I tried to set up four > computers at once with all of the data, and all of the computers showed huge > backlogs of data to synchronize that looked like they would never finish. > Rebooting caused the backlogs to double, so that was definitely a bad idea. > I uninstalled and started over adding computers one at time and letting each > one fully sync. > > (2) It does not sync nearly as smoothly as FolderShare There are often long > delays before a file syncs, and some files for no apparent reason do not get > updated until you kick them again by renaming or moving them. This is of > course a big problem, but I am hoping (probably foolishly) that it will go > away once I have it up and running. > > (3) The amount of synchronization activity seems to go up very fast as the > number of computers involved goes up. With just two computers, it was > pretty quick. When I added the 4th computer, it took a very long time to get > it synced. > > (4) It crashes surprisingly often. I have seen four crashes so far today. > > (5) The automatic backup feature is nice and seems to work well. The > encryption feature is *disabled* by default, so you will want to change this > in the options before you back up the data. > > (6) One of the benefits of the more expensive "Business" version is supposed > to be telephone support, but if they have a U.S. telephone number, I couldn't > find it on the web site. > > (7) One reason for the slow performance might be that it wants me to change > our router settings to set up port forwarding on port 5584, which they > recommend "for best performance", although there is no indication of how > important this is. The problem is, they require a separate dedicated port > for *each* computer, and they all have to be configured in the router, and > each computer needs its dedicated port assignment specified in the settings. > This means that every time you move computer, get a different IP address, or > just connect through a different network (i.e., wireless), you have to go > into your port settings. (Their article is here: > http://www.beinsync.com/firewall_nat_settings.php). > > Having to jump through these kinds of hoops to connect through a NAT router > is insane. > > Overall, pretty disappointing. > > "pbx" wrote: > Quote: > > I would like to hear from users of foldershare as to what alternatives are > > out there. Notwithstanding the Foldershare team's efforts, it seems that > > Foldershare isn't a priority for Microsoft. I can't imagine a situation > > where Google would say, "hey we are down for 48 hours for maintenance". This > > just doesn't fly. Obviously they don't have the resources to keep this > > awesome application running 24/7/365, which is disappointing. By as much as > > a fan that I am, I have to face facts and move on to something else. Readers > > please suggest alternatives with pros and cons. Thanks in advance. |
My System Specs![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| alternatives to Console ? | PowerShell | |||
| Alternatives to RegWorks ? | Vista General | |||
| Intellipoint alternatives | Vista hardware & devices | |||