![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| | |||||||
| | Vista - Why not www.mesh.com? |
| |
| 06-19-2008 | #1 |
| | Why not www.mesh.com? Microsoft is killing it's own baby with www.mesh.com While it's still in technical beta, mesh does have limit of 10,000 files (100,000 at the moment), works very well (no outages so far), allows you to connect to your remote machines interactively (!!!!), allows offline access to your files (first 5GB) and have very active Micrsoft employees involvement of all operations of the website and client. You are notifed when new version is coming, what is fixed, what is being worked on etc. So wondering what FolderShare team think about future of FolderShare and how this will play along with LiveMesh which at this point. |
| My System Specs |
| 06-19-2008 | #2 |
| | RE: Why not www.mesh.com? The status of mesh is full. If you apply, your status woud be pending, right? Not sure how soon it will get approved. "ChanKaiShi" wrote: Quote: > Microsoft is killing it's own baby with www.mesh.com > While it's still in technical beta, mesh does have limit of 10,000 files > (100,000 at the moment), works very well (no outages so far), allows you to > connect to your remote machines interactively (!!!!), allows offline access > to your files (first 5GB) and have very active Micrsoft employees involvement > of all operations of the website and client. You are notifed when new version > is coming, what is fixed, what is being worked on etc. > So wondering what FolderShare team think about future of FolderShare and how > this will play along with LiveMesh which at this point. |
| My System Specs |
| 06-24-2008 | #3 |
| | Re: Why not www.mesh.com? I applied when it first went out like twenty years ago and I am still not on. "eruisi" <eruisi@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:343DFB95-B6DA-4DA4-9609-C0D3A468DDA9@xxxxxx Quote: > The status of mesh is full. If you apply, your status woud be pending, > right? > Not sure how soon it will get approved. > > "ChanKaiShi" wrote: > Quote: >> Microsoft is killing it's own baby with www.mesh.com >> While it's still in technical beta, mesh does have limit of 10,000 files >> (100,000 at the moment), works very well (no outages so far), allows you >> to >> connect to your remote machines interactively (!!!!), allows offline >> access >> to your files (first 5GB) and have very active Micrsoft employees >> involvement >> of all operations of the website and client. You are notifed when new >> version >> is coming, what is fixed, what is being worked on etc. >> So wondering what FolderShare team think about future of FolderShare and >> how >> this will play along with LiveMesh which at this point. |
| My System Specs |
| 06-24-2008 | #4 |
| | Re: Why not www.mesh.com? I applied and got approved in a week. But it's way too clumsy compared with FS. The only two advantages of mesh I noted are: 1. has online backup, synch doesn't require one machine on 2. support unicode file name (FS supports adding files with unicode name, but can not synch modified files with unicode names. I really don't understand why this small bug takes FS team so much time to work on!) "BigK" wrote: Quote: > I applied when it first went out like twenty years ago and I am still not > on. > > "eruisi" <eruisi@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:343DFB95-B6DA-4DA4-9609-C0D3A468DDA9@xxxxxx Quote: > > The status of mesh is full. If you apply, your status woud be pending, > > right? > > Not sure how soon it will get approved. > > > > "ChanKaiShi" wrote: > > Quote: > >> Microsoft is killing it's own baby with www.mesh.com > >> While it's still in technical beta, mesh does have limit of 10,000 files > >> (100,000 at the moment), works very well (no outages so far), allows you > >> to > >> connect to your remote machines interactively (!!!!), allows offline > >> access > >> to your files (first 5GB) and have very active Micrsoft employees > >> involvement > >> of all operations of the website and client. You are notifed when new > >> version > >> is coming, what is fixed, what is being worked on etc. > >> So wondering what FolderShare team think about future of FolderShare and > >> how > >> this will play along with LiveMesh which at this point. |
| My System Specs |
| 06-25-2008 | #5 |
| | RE: Why not www.mesh.com? I did some tests on my FS: 1) Adding a unicode file can be detected by FS and sent to remote machines, but no message indicates the sending 2) Changing a unicode file can not be detected by FS. If you close FS and restart it, the changes you previously made will be detected and synchronized correctly. Hope FS team will fix this bug very soon. "eruisi" wrote: Quote: > The status of mesh is full. If you apply, your status woud be pending, right? > Not sure how soon it will get approved. > > "ChanKaiShi" wrote: > Quote: > > Microsoft is killing it's own baby with www.mesh.com > > While it's still in technical beta, mesh does have limit of 10,000 files > > (100,000 at the moment), works very well (no outages so far), allows you to > > connect to your remote machines interactively (!!!!), allows offline access > > to your files (first 5GB) and have very active Micrsoft employees involvement > > of all operations of the website and client. You are notifed when new version > > is coming, what is fixed, what is being worked on etc. > > So wondering what FolderShare team think about future of FolderShare and how > > this will play along with LiveMesh which at this point. |
| My System Specs |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| Similar Threads for: Why not www.mesh.com? | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Mesh and Resolution | Software | |||
| Windows Live Mesh | General Discussion | |||
| mesh | Vista General | |||