![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Port Status Tab in Settings I have Foldershare set up to work behind my router between two computers on a wireless network. The data that is to be synchronized between these two computers is always on the wireless network controlled by a wireless router and is never accessed from the other side of the router (i.e. the Internet). After changing the data on one computer, the files are not synchronized, although there are entries in Foldershare that indicate files have been transferred. When I look at thea Settings box under the port status tab, I notice that on one computer all four TCP ports (80, 443, 6571, 8000) are "Blocked" under the "Accect Connections" column on one computer and the other has either all blocked or two of them blocked. Do these ports have to be "unblocked" to accept connections or data from the other computer, when both computers are working behind a router with a built-in firewall? If they have to be "unblocked" how do I go about doing that? My assumption is that there is no connection with the FolderShare server required if I have no remote access selected for the computers. True? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Port Status Tab in Settings On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:42:01 -0700, DGD <DGD@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > I have Foldershare set up to work behind my router between two computers on a > wireless network. The data that is to be synchronized between these two > computers is always on the wireless network controlled by a wireless router > and is never accessed from the other side of the router (i.e. the Internet). > After changing the data on one computer, the files are not synchronized, > although there are entries in Foldershare that indicate files have been > transferred. When I look at thea Settings box under the port status tab, I > notice that on one computer all four TCP ports (80, 443, 6571, 8000) are > "Blocked" under the "Accect Connections" column on one computer and the other > has either all blocked or two of them blocked. Do these ports have to be > "unblocked" to accept connections or data from the other computer, when both > computers are working behind a router with a built-in firewall? computers away from your local network although there would be a speed benefit in that situation because doing that enables p2p connections. You can get full speed p2p connections between the hosts on your LAN just by educating the firewalls of your computers and without needing to set up port forwarding in your gateway router. Quote: > If they have > to be "unblocked" how do I go about doing that? My assumption is that there > is no connection with the FolderShare server required if I have no remote > access selected for the computers. True? master indexes of the files in your libraries. But you do not need to open inward connections to the FS ports of your computers to enable that. Tony |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Port Status Tab in Settings "Anthony R. Gold" wrote: Quote: > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:42:01 -0700, DGD <DGD@xxxxxx> > wrote: > Quote: > > I have Foldershare set up to work behind my router between two computers on a > > wireless network. The data that is to be synchronized between these two > > computers is always on the wireless network controlled by a wireless router > > and is never accessed from the other side of the router (i.e. the Internet). > > After changing the data on one computer, the files are not synchronized, > > although there are entries in Foldershare that indicate files have been > > transferred. When I look at thea Settings box under the port status tab, I > > notice that on one computer all four TCP ports (80, 443, 6571, 8000) are > > "Blocked" under the "Accect Connections" column on one computer and the other > > has either all blocked or two of them blocked. Do these ports have to be > > "unblocked" to accept connections or data from the other computer, when both > > computers are working behind a router with a built-in firewall? > No. Indeed those don't even need to be unblocked when synchronising with > computers away from your local network although there would be a speed > benefit in that situation because doing that enables p2p connections. You > can get full speed p2p connections between the hosts on your LAN just by > educating the firewalls of your computers and without needing to set up > port forwarding in your gateway router. > Quote: > > If they have > > to be "unblocked" how do I go about doing that? My assumption is that there > > is no connection with the FolderShare server required if I have no remote > > access selected for the computers. True? > Your computers must have access to the MS FS servers because they keep the > master indexes of the files in your libraries. But you do not need to open > inward connections to the FS ports of your computers to enable that. > > Tony > indicate they have sent updated files to the other computer in the activity section of the FS application, but when one compares the files they are different. If the FS server is down for instance, will that cause the files to not synchronize? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Port Status Tab in Settings On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:50:02 -0700, DGD <DGD@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > > > "Anthony R. Gold" wrote: > Quote: >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:42:01 -0700, DGD <DGD@xxxxxx> >> wrote: >> Quote: >>> I have Foldershare set up to work behind my router between two computers on a >>> wireless network. The data that is to be synchronized between these two >>> computers is always on the wireless network controlled by a wireless router >>> and is never accessed from the other side of the router (i.e. the Internet). >>> After changing the data on one computer, the files are not synchronized, >>> although there are entries in Foldershare that indicate files have been >>> transferred. When I look at thea Settings box under the port status tab, I >>> notice that on one computer all four TCP ports (80, 443, 6571, 8000) are >>> "Blocked" under the "Accect Connections" column on one computer and the other >>> has either all blocked or two of them blocked. Do these ports have to be >>> "unblocked" to accept connections or data from the other computer, when both >>> computers are working behind a router with a built-in firewall? >> No. Indeed those don't even need to be unblocked when synchronising with >> computers away from your local network although there would be a speed >> benefit in that situation because doing that enables p2p connections. You >> can get full speed p2p connections between the hosts on your LAN just by >> educating the firewalls of your computers and without needing to set up >> port forwarding in your gateway router. >> Quote: >>> If they have >>> to be "unblocked" how do I go about doing that? My assumption is that there >>> is no connection with the FolderShare server required if I have no remote >>> access selected for the computers. True? >> Your computers must have access to the MS FS servers because they keep the >> master indexes of the files in your libraries. But you do not need to open >> inward connections to the FS ports of your computers to enable that. >> >> Tony >> > indicate they have sent updated files to the other computer in the activity > section of the FS application, but when one compares the files they are > different. to be different. Are you sure you are looking at the right files? Quote: > If the FS server is down for instance, will that cause the files > to not synchronize? will not be able to find each other or be told which files to send and to receive. Tony |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Port Status Tab in Settings "Anthony R. Gold" wrote: Quote: > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:50:02 -0700, DGD <DGD@xxxxxx> > wrote: > Quote: > > > > > > "Anthony R. Gold" wrote: > > Quote: > >> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:42:01 -0700, DGD <DGD@xxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I have Foldershare set up to work behind my router between two computers on a > >>> wireless network. The data that is to be synchronized between these two > >>> computers is always on the wireless network controlled by a wireless router > >>> and is never accessed from the other side of the router (i.e. the Internet). > >>> After changing the data on one computer, the files are not synchronized, > >>> although there are entries in Foldershare that indicate files have been > >>> transferred. When I look at thea Settings box under the port status tab, I > >>> notice that on one computer all four TCP ports (80, 443, 6571, 8000) are > >>> "Blocked" under the "Accect Connections" column on one computer and the other > >>> has either all blocked or two of them blocked. Do these ports have to be > >>> "unblocked" to accept connections or data from the other computer, when both > >>> computers are working behind a router with a built-in firewall? > >> > >> No. Indeed those don't even need to be unblocked when synchronising with > >> computers away from your local network although there would be a speed > >> benefit in that situation because doing that enables p2p connections. You > >> can get full speed p2p connections between the hosts on your LAN just by > >> educating the firewalls of your computers and without needing to set up > >> port forwarding in your gateway router. > >> > >>> If they have > >>> to be "unblocked" how do I go about doing that? My assumption is that there > >>> is no connection with the FolderShare server required if I have no remote > >>> access selected for the computers. True? > >> > >> Your computers must have access to the MS FS servers because they keep the > >> master indexes of the files in your libraries. But you do not need to open > >> inward connections to the FS ports of your computers to enable that. > >> > >> Tony > >> > > indicate they have sent updated files to the other computer in the activity > > section of the FS application, but when one compares the files they are > > different. > If the files have been sent and received I can think of no reason for them > to be different. Are you sure you are looking at the right files? > Quote: > > If the FS server is down for instance, will that cause the files > > to not synchronize? > I don't understand the question. If the FS servers are down your computers > will not be able to find each other or be told which files to send and to > receive. > > Tony > to the files and when they were sent to the other computer. There is nothing in either log that indicates files have been received from the other computer. Should there be such a log entry? Thanks. DGD |
My System Specs![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Re: Parallel Port Settings? | Virtual Server | |||
| tcp/udp port settings OFP GOTY | Gaming | |||
| Outlook connection settings and status | Browsers & Mail | |||
| Port Forwarding/Network settings for web camera | Vista hardware & devices | |||