![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: multiple Inboxes "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:eHq6dlyQIHA.5288@xxxxxx Quote: > "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message Quote: > news:#5DKD9xQIHA.1164@xxxxxx What a coincidence! WLM obviously needs to escape that #. Quote: Quote: >> "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:O1EdzjvQIHA.3940@xxxxxx Quote: >>> It's been established that Quick views is fragile. When it breaks, the >>> message count doesn't work and it will only show (mail) messages received >>> after the accident. The treatment has been posted many times: delete >>> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows Live Mail\SearchFolderVersion, and the >>> prophylactic: don't delete any folder under Storage folders. Quote: >> Yet the latter is what Ron Sommer seems to be suggesting as the first step >> in removing unwanted messages from the ("Quick View" of) All News <eg> > There's a subtle difference. What breaks the Quick views is deleting, say, > an empty Recovered items folder showing under Storage folders in the Folder > pane - i.e. using the UI. Ron very bravely used Explorer to delete the > newsgroup folder found in the Store folder, but found that a subsequent > compaction - reindexing of the MessageStore - brought everything into line > again. If this had caused a(nother) malfunction in Quick views, I think he'd > have said so. Yes, of course. Did you notice my smirk? ; ) Quote: > Quote: >> news:%23xW9xtpLIHA.3940@xxxxxx >> Subject: Re: Unwanted newsgroup postings >> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:10:49 -0600 >> >> BTW I would have sworn that I had posted that news link correctly >> yesterday >> but somehow in Sent Items I found the %23 converted back to a # >> (which won't work if you try to use it from the IE Address bar.) >> In any case I am sending it today with %23. If it changes again >> there is a bug somewhere. So there *is* a bug in WLM about this. See the above Message-ID that you replied to. ; ) I have just gone back to repeat the Ctrl-Shift-F Find and Ctrl-g on the one from Ron that started this little digression and confirmed that that would be how the error occurred in my original post. Now that I am aware of the bug I will have to remember to do manual conversion of that character even when I use Ctrl-g to generate a news: link (which rather defeats the purpose of going to the trouble of doing a Ctrl-g in some cases anyway.) Quote: > > That one works fine for me with its %23. Of the two in the preamble to this > post, yours (which has a #) doesn't work, but mine (with neither # nor %23) > does. What's your explanation for that? # is one of the characters which must be escaped to be used as a URL. Your Message-ID didn't contain any characters which required escaping. Mine did. Here specifically is the source of the problem: http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=3977 (Live Search for RFC news NNTP "Message-ID" ) <quotes> 9.8. General Non-terminals message-id = "<" 1*248A-NOTGT ">" A-NOTGT = %x21-3D / %x3F-7E ; exclude ">" </quotes> Elsewhere in the document that specification was interpreted as: <quote> For the purposes of this specification, message-ids are opaque strings that MUST meet the following requirements: o A message-id MUST begin with "<", end with ">", and MUST NOT contain the latter except at the end. o A message-id MUST be between 3 and 250 octets in length. o A message-id MUST NOT contain octets other than printable US-ASCII characters. </quote> Now you have to compare that spec. with this one: http://rfc.sunsite.dk/rfc/rfc1738.html (Live Search for RFC news NNTP "Uniform Resource Locator" ) <quotes> url = httpurl | ftpurl | newsurl | nntpurl | telneturl | gopherurl | waisurl | mailtourl | fileurl | prosperourl | otherurl newsurl = "news:" grouppart grouppart = "*" | group | article group = alpha *[ alpha | digit | "-" | "." | "+" | "_" ] article = 1*[ uchar | ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "&" | "=" ] "@" host alpha = lowalpha | hialpha digit = "0" | "1" | "2" | "3" | "4" | "5" | "6" | "7" | "8" | "9" safe = "$" | "-" | "_" | "." | "+" extra = "!" | "*" | "'" | "(" | ")" | "," escape = "%" hex hex unreserved = alpha | digit | safe | extra uchar = unreserved | escape </quotes> E.g. notice that the NNTP spec permits # in its definition of Message-ID but the URL spec does not. Hence it has to be escaped to be used in a URL, which is what prefixing the Message-ID stripped of its angle brackets is supposed to be. BTW this shows that $ is supposed to be safe but I think that I have seen that OE usually escapes it too. E.g. $ represented in news: links by %24 Quote: > > I hope you noticed my post yesterday claiming that news: links invoke the > default news server, not the one currently active. Yes. That's the same as OE. Quote: > > Whilst we're at it, why does your post have no Content-Type or charset > header when mine do? > -- > Noel Probably a difference in our Send options. I suspect it is just that for News, Plain Text I have UUEncode selected, not MIME. Also ICIM I do not use Reply to messages in the format in which they were sent and in International Send Settings I have: Western European (ISO) for my characterset and I have checked: When replying to messages always use English headers. Robert --- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: multiple Inboxes _ _ _--- "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u2CLNMoQIHA.1212@xxxxxx Quote: > Quick views is intended to give you this functionality. View > Layout > > Folder pane > Show Quick views. Then right-click on Quick views and Select > Quick views. All inbox will show you the contents of all three of your > inboxes - and the rest you can probably work out for yourself. > When in the All inbox Quick view, you will be able to click on a column > header in the Message list and select Columns. If you make sure that > Account is one of them, you'll be able to see at a glance which account > which message belongs to. < < < Quote: > -- > Noel > accounts only 1 message shows any account name. I don't know for sure if this is just an isolated instance, but I doubt it. -- Thanks, Mike - Windows XP Pro SP2 WLM 12.0.1606.1023 _______________________________________________ Quote: Quote: >> "Ian M Reed" <ianmreed@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:7M-dncm0suXlH_TanZ2dnUVZ8uudnZ2d@xxxxxx >> I have 3 email accounts - in OE there was only one Inbox/sent >> folder/outbox covering all accounts - now I have to check through 3 of >> each to find emails - is there a way to amalgamate the inboxes and other >> folders into one as in OE >> >> Ian M Reed >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: multiple Inboxes "_mikebs" <someone@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:C6FF1DB8-2289-4BE7-B98C-5A8979CB6628@xxxxxx Quote: > > _ _ _--- > "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u2CLNMoQIHA.1212@xxxxxx Quote: >> Quick views is intended to give you this functionality. View > Layout > Folder pane > Show Quick views. Then right-click on >> Quick views and Select Quick views. All inbox will show you the contents of all three of your inboxes - and the rest you can >> probably work out for yourself. >> When in the All inbox Quick view, you will be able to click on a column header in the Message list and select Columns. If you >> make sure that Account is one of them, you'll be able to see at a glance which account which message belongs to. < < < Quote: >> -- >> Noel >> > know for sure if this is just an isolated instance, but I doubt it. Still, there is no excuse for the account name to be missing on any. -- Gary VanderMolen [MS-MVP WLM] |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Multiple inboxes for multiple accounts | Vista mail | |||
| Mutiple Inboxes? | Vista mail | |||
| Can I lose all all those inboxes? | Live Mail | |||
| Seperate Inboxes?? | Vista mail | |||
| Too many inboxes | Live Mail | |||