Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Windows Live > Live Mail

Vista - Need info on spam filtering

Reply
 
Old 01-15-2008   #1 (permalink)
Jay


 
 

Need info on spam filtering

I use the message rules to do much of my spam filtering, do the message
rules get applied before or after the programs built in spam filter? Also,
does the program's built in spam filter work only on Microsoft accounts or
other ISP's POP3 accounts as well?




My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 01-17-2008   #2 (permalink)
Ildhund


 
 

Re: Need info on spam filtering

Rules get applied first. I say this because all my incoming POP mail is
diverted by rules to folders under the default account, and all my POP spam
is delivered to that account's junk folder. So, yes, the built-in filter
works on POP accounts.
--
Noel

"Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:F4FCD627-3734-417B-8650-79A9D3501C15@xxxxxx
Quote:

> I use the message rules to do much of my spam filtering, do the message
> rules get applied before or after the programs built in spam filter? Also,
> does the program's built in spam filter work only on Microsoft accounts or
> other ISP's POP3 accounts as well?
>
>
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 01-17-2008   #3 (permalink)
Jay


 
 

Re: Need info on spam filtering

Hmmm, strange thing is I found 100s of emails in the built in "Junk e-mail"
folder of a POP account indicating they got their due to WLM built in spam
filtering but it sounds like your saying they should have been diverted into
my own "junk" type folder due to my message rules. I just applied the
relevant "junk" message rules to the "Junk e-mail" folder and they were
moved into my own junk folder like I believe they should have been in the
first place. Confused ...

"Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OUCvAtVWIHA.5596@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Rules get applied first. I say this because all my incoming POP mail is
> diverted by rules to folders under the default account, and all my POP
> spam is delivered to that account's junk folder. So, yes, the built-in
> filter works on POP accounts.
> --
> Noel
>
> "Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:F4FCD627-3734-417B-8650-79A9D3501C15@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> I use the message rules to do much of my spam filtering, do the message
>> rules get applied before or after the programs built in spam filter?
>> Also, does the program's built in spam filter work only on Microsoft
>> accounts or other ISP's POP3 accounts as well?
>>
>>
>>
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 01-18-2008   #4 (permalink)
Ildhund


 
 

Re: Need info on spam filtering

I can only report what I am seeing. My set-up is quite complex (18 POP
accounts and five HTTP, 27 message rules) and it works almost perfectly*. I
have the junk filter on High. None of my rules are designed to trap spam - I
reckon that the Outlook filtering engine that WLMail uses will do the job
better. Two points to remember: the order in which rules are applied is
vital, and unless there's a good reason not to do so, each rule should end
with Stop processing more rules. Try ensuring that all mail is diverted to
folders outside the account it's delivered to - so after moving messages
from family to the Family folder and ones about tennis to the Tennis folder,
the next rule could move messages received on a particular account to a
Miscellaneous folder. That way the only messages in "sub-account" folders
will be in Sent items, which you can clear up periodically, and you can
leave those sub-account folder branches collapsed and pretty well ignore
them.

*"Almost perfectly" means that there's occasionally legitimate mail in my
junk folder, but that's usually because I need to refine my rules a bit.
Very rarely does spam end up in another folder.
--
Noel

"Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uMBCYUXWIHA.484@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hmmm, strange thing is I found 100s of emails in the built in "Junk
> e-mail" folder of a POP account indicating they got their due to WLM built
> in spam filtering but it sounds like your saying they should have been
> diverted into my own "junk" type folder due to my message rules. I just
> applied the relevant "junk" message rules to the "Junk e-mail" folder and
> they were moved into my own junk folder like I believe they should have
> been in the first place. Confused ...
>
> "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OUCvAtVWIHA.5596@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> Rules get applied first. I say this because all my incoming POP mail is
>> diverted by rules to folders under the default account, and all my POP
>> spam is delivered to that account's junk folder. So, yes, the built-in
>> filter works on POP accounts.
>> --
>> Noel
>>
>> "Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:F4FCD627-3734-417B-8650-79A9D3501C15@xxxxxx
Quote:

>>> I use the message rules to do much of my spam filtering, do the message
>>> rules get applied before or after the programs built in spam filter?
>>> Also, does the program's built in spam filter work only on Microsoft
>>> accounts or other ISP's POP3 accounts as well?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-09-2008   #5 (permalink)
WickedViking


 
 

Re: Need info on spam filtering

I have a similar problem: e-mail from my reegular contacts are not passed on
as spam when using Outlook or Thunderbird (filters have been trained).
However, in WLM, 9 out of 10 goes straight to the Deleted Items folder. I
have told the system for over a week now that the sender's e-mail and the
sender's domain should be added to the Safe Sender/Safe domain list. I have
also added their addresses to my contacts. My spam setting was at high, now I
have moved it to low. But nothing helps: it still goes straight to my Deleted
ietms folder.
Can anyone give me a few pointers? Or this a "feature" :-)
--
"Hagar"


"Ildhund" wrote:
Quote:

> I can only report what I am seeing. My set-up is quite complex (18 POP
> accounts and five HTTP, 27 message rules) and it works almost perfectly*. I
> have the junk filter on High. None of my rules are designed to trap spam - I
> reckon that the Outlook filtering engine that WLMail uses will do the job
> better. Two points to remember: the order in which rules are applied is
> vital, and unless there's a good reason not to do so, each rule should end
> with Stop processing more rules. Try ensuring that all mail is diverted to
> folders outside the account it's delivered to - so after moving messages
> from family to the Family folder and ones about tennis to the Tennis folder,
> the next rule could move messages received on a particular account to a
> Miscellaneous folder. That way the only messages in "sub-account" folders
> will be in Sent items, which you can clear up periodically, and you can
> leave those sub-account folder branches collapsed and pretty well ignore
> them.
>
> *"Almost perfectly" means that there's occasionally legitimate mail in my
> junk folder, but that's usually because I need to refine my rules a bit.
> Very rarely does spam end up in another folder.
> --
> Noel
>
> "Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uMBCYUXWIHA.484@xxxxxx
Quote:

> > Hmmm, strange thing is I found 100s of emails in the built in "Junk
> > e-mail" folder of a POP account indicating they got their due to WLM built
> > in spam filtering but it sounds like your saying they should have been
> > diverted into my own "junk" type folder due to my message rules. I just
> > applied the relevant "junk" message rules to the "Junk e-mail" folder and
> > they were moved into my own junk folder like I believe they should have
> > been in the first place. Confused ...
> >
> > "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:OUCvAtVWIHA.5596@xxxxxx
Quote:

> >> Rules get applied first. I say this because all my incoming POP mail is
> >> diverted by rules to folders under the default account, and all my POP
> >> spam is delivered to that account's junk folder. So, yes, the built-in
> >> filter works on POP accounts.
> >> --
> >> Noel
> >>
> >> "Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:F4FCD627-3734-417B-8650-79A9D3501C15@xxxxxx
> >>> I use the message rules to do much of my spam filtering, do the message
> >>> rules get applied before or after the programs built in spam filter?
> >>> Also, does the program's built in spam filter work only on Microsoft
> >>> accounts or other ISP's POP3 accounts as well?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-09-2008   #6 (permalink)
Ildhund


 
 

Re: Need info on spam filtering

Is this an HTTP or IMAP account or a POP3 account? If it's HTTP, you should
check the junk e-mail settings at the web interface. If they are set to, for
example, Standard filtering and delete Immediately, then when the account
synchronizes, anything found to be junk will end up in your local Deleted
items folder. You can also check your entire Safe senders list there,
including domains and senders whose address starts with a number, which
WLMail for some reason does not show.

If it's a POP account, do you have any message rules that could cause this
behaviour?
--
Noel

"WickedViking" <WickedViking@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A321649C-33AF-42C8-A46A-21B9A84C5FB6@xxxxxx
Quote:

> I have a similar problem: e-mail from my reegular contacts are not passed
> on
> as spam when using Outlook or Thunderbird (filters have been trained).
> However, in WLM, 9 out of 10 goes straight to the Deleted Items folder. I
> have told the system for over a week now that the sender's e-mail and the
> sender's domain should be added to the Safe Sender/Safe domain list. I
> have
> also added their addresses to my contacts. My spam setting was at high,
> now I
> have moved it to low. But nothing helps: it still goes straight to my
> Deleted
> ietms folder.
> Can anyone give me a few pointers? Or this a "feature" :-)
> --
> "Hagar"
>
>
> "Ildhund" wrote:
>
Quote:

>> I can only report what I am seeing. My set-up is quite complex (18 POP
>> accounts and five HTTP, 27 message rules) and it works almost perfectly*.
>> I
>> have the junk filter on High. None of my rules are designed to trap
>> spam - I
>> reckon that the Outlook filtering engine that WLMail uses will do the job
>> better. Two points to remember: the order in which rules are applied is
>> vital, and unless there's a good reason not to do so, each rule should
>> end
>> with Stop processing more rules. Try ensuring that all mail is diverted
>> to
>> folders outside the account it's delivered to - so after moving messages
>> from family to the Family folder and ones about tennis to the Tennis
>> folder,
>> the next rule could move messages received on a particular account to a
>> Miscellaneous folder. That way the only messages in "sub-account" folders
>> will be in Sent items, which you can clear up periodically, and you can
>> leave those sub-account folder branches collapsed and pretty well ignore
>> them.
>>
>> *"Almost perfectly" means that there's occasionally legitimate mail in my
>> junk folder, but that's usually because I need to refine my rules a bit.
>> Very rarely does spam end up in another folder.
>> --
>> Noel
>>
>> "Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:uMBCYUXWIHA.484@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> > Hmmm, strange thing is I found 100s of emails in the built in "Junk
>> > e-mail" folder of a POP account indicating they got their due to WLM
>> > built
>> > in spam filtering but it sounds like your saying they should have been
>> > diverted into my own "junk" type folder due to my message rules. I just
>> > applied the relevant "junk" message rules to the "Junk e-mail" folder
>> > and
>> > they were moved into my own junk folder like I believe they should have
>> > been in the first place. Confused ...
>> >
>> > "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:OUCvAtVWIHA.5596@xxxxxx
>> >> Rules get applied first. I say this because all my incoming POP mail
>> >> is
>> >> diverted by rules to folders under the default account, and all my POP
>> >> spam is delivered to that account's junk folder. So, yes, the built-in
>> >> filter works on POP accounts.
>> >> --
>> >> Noel
>> >>
>> >> "Jay" <jmox@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:F4FCD627-3734-417B-8650-79A9D3501C15@xxxxxx
>> >>> I use the message rules to do much of my spam filtering, do the
>> >>> message
>> >>> rules get applied before or after the programs built in spam filter?
>> >>> Also, does the program's built in spam filter work only on Microsoft
>> >>> accounts or other ISP's POP3 accounts as well?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-09-2008   #7 (permalink)
Peter.R


 
 

Re: Need info on spam filtering

Are the following options checked or unchecked?

Tools->Safety options...->Safe Senders [tab]->"Also trust e-mail from my Contacts"

Tools->Safety options...->Options [tab]->"Permanently delete suspected junk e-mail instead of moving it into the Junk E-mail folder"

--
Cheers,
Peter
(Windows Vista Home Premium with Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606)
"There are more things in Heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." - Shakespeare
---------------

"WickedViking" <WickedViking@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:A321649C-33AF-42C8-A46A-21B9A84C5FB6@xxxxxx

Quote:

> I have a similar problem: e-mail from my reegular contacts are not passed on
> as spam when using Outlook or Thunderbird (filters have been trained).
> However, in WLM, 9 out of 10 goes straight to the Deleted Items folder. I
> have told the system for over a week now that the sender's e-mail and the
> sender's domain should be added to the Safe Sender/Safe domain list. I have
> also added their addresses to my contacts. My spam setting was at high, now I
> have moved it to low. But nothing helps: it still goes straight to my Deleted
> ietms folder.
> Can anyone give me a few pointers? Or this a "feature" :-)
> --
> "Hagar"
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-10-2008   #8 (permalink)
WickedViking


 
 

Re: Need info on spam filtering

"Also trust e-mail from my Contacts" is checked. All accounts are POP
accounts, I do not have any message rules. Spam settings at the web interface
are set to "move to Junk Mail folder". But all the contacts in question are
white-listed in the web interface.
--
"Hagar"


"Peter.R" wrote:
Quote:

> Are the following options checked or unchecked?
>
> Tools->Safety options...->Safe Senders [tab]->"Also trust e-mail from my
> Contacts"
>
> Tools->Safety options...->Options [tab]->"Permanently delete suspected
> junk e-mail instead of moving it into the Junk E-mail folder"
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Peter
> (Windows Vista Home Premium with Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606)
> "There are more things in Heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in
> your philosophy." - Shakespeare
> ---------------
>
> "WickedViking" <WickedViking@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:A321649C-33AF-42C8-A46A-21B9A84C5FB6@xxxxxx
>
Quote:

> > I have a similar problem: e-mail from my reegular contacts are not
> passed on
Quote:

> > as spam when using Outlook or Thunderbird (filters have been trained).
> > However, in WLM, 9 out of 10 goes straight to the Deleted Items folder.
> I
Quote:

> > have told the system for over a week now that the sender's e-mail and
> the
Quote:

> > sender's domain should be added to the Safe Sender/Safe domain list. I
> have
Quote:

> > also added their addresses to my contacts. My spam setting was at high,
> now I
Quote:

> > have moved it to low. But nothing helps: it still goes straight to my
> Deleted
Quote:

> > ietms folder.
> > Can anyone give me a few pointers? Or this a "feature" :-)
> > --
> > "Hagar"
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Windows mail is filtering emails into spam Vista mail
Spam Filtering Live Mail
spam filtering on folders Live Mail
Windows mail default spam filtering rules?? Vista mail
IMAP spam filtering issue in Windows Mail (Vista 5472) Vista mail


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46