![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Receiving WLM emails at the other end As I get more familiar with WLM, I find several enhanced features to use when creating and sending emails. Lots of options when sending photos....borders, layouts, added text, etc. I'm wondering what the receivers see if they don't have WLM. I'd like to dress up my emails but if the receiver can't receive them or they become a real mess at the other end I don't want to do that. I guess even stationary and emoticons could cause problems for some systems? Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks, bj |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Receiving WLM emails at the other end Emails like this are transmitted as common or garden HTML, so anyone who can normally read HTML mail should have no problem reading messages from you with fancy formatting. The WLMail HTML generator has shown a few symptoms of being less than perfect, but there have been too few reports to be able to pin down whatever faults there might be. Give it a go, and please report back with the results so others can benefit. -- Noel "Beejaysoo" <beejaysoo@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:e5zSBfRjIHA.4744@xxxxxx Quote: > As I get more familiar with WLM, I find several enhanced features to use > when creating and sending emails. Lots of options when sending > photos....borders, layouts, added text, etc. I'm wondering what the > receivers see if they don't have WLM. I'd like to dress up my emails but > if the receiver can't receive them or they become a real mess at the other > end I don't want to do that. I guess even stationary and emoticons could > cause problems for some systems? > > Any comments would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > bj |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Receiving WLM emails at the other end To add to Noel's response.. In some rare cases, the recipient, based on their client and isp may sometimes see something different than what is transmitted. e.g. A recipient's isp may have options configurable via the email account on the web site that takes first priority over the local client(filtering, plain text features). Normally what you see is what they get provided they have the same mail viewing capability as your mail client's creation. Note: A recipients client may override what you view prior to sending..ie.. recipient is set to read all in plain text, pictures and html not downloaded due to the recipient(s) local client security constraints. In a similar vane...what you see may be different, especially in cases where a sender is using Outlook's Rich Text format. The only certain way to find out is to ask the recipient. -- ...winston ms-mvp windows live mail "Beejaysoo" <beejaysoo@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:e5zSBfRjIHA.4744@xxxxxx Quote: > As I get more familiar with WLM, I find several enhanced features to use when creating and sending emails. Lots of options when > sending photos....borders, layouts, added text, etc. I'm wondering what the receivers see if they don't have WLM. I'd like to > dress up my emails but if the receiver can't receive them or they become a real mess at the other end I don't want to do that. I > guess even stationary and emoticons could cause problems for some systems? > > Any comments would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > bj |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Receiving WLM emails at the other end > The only certain way to find out is to ask the recipient. I agree, but to be honest most email clients are pretty sorted now, when it comes to HTML-formatted emails. There is a different issue: should you use HTML for emails anyway? HTML emails are bigger, and thus impose more overheads on the Internet's email infrastructure. Also, they theoretically have the potential to pose more security risks (the email protocol used on the Internet is very unsophisticated and has little or no provision for security measures). Also, some people switch off the display of HTML-formatted emails anyway, so they will read it as plain text no matter what you send. It's worth bearing these in mind when coming to a view on whether to send plain text or HTML-formatted emails. SteveT |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Receiving WLM emails at the other end One thing I have been told by two recipients is that although they are given the option to view photos as a slideshow...that doesn't seem to work when they click on it. I'm using feature where photos are sent in high resolution with thumbnail in email and pictures held on MS server. I would assume when recipients choose to see photos that they would be directed to that server where slideshow would be viewed???? Thanks, bj "...winston" <winstonmvp@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:A16A74A1-09FC-4308-96B2-EA7C67AEE272@xxxxxx Quote: > To add to Noel's response.. > In some rare cases, the recipient, based on their client and isp may > sometimes see something different than what is transmitted. > e.g. A recipient's isp may have options configurable via the email account > on the web site that takes first priority over the local client(filtering, > plain text features). > Normally what you see is what they get provided they have the same mail > viewing capability as your mail client's creation. > > Note: A recipients client may override what you view prior to > sending..ie.. recipient is set to read all in plain text, pictures and > html not downloaded due to the recipient(s) local client security > constraints. > > In a similar vane...what you see may be different, especially in cases > where a sender is using Outlook's Rich Text format. > > The only certain way to find out is to ask the recipient. > -- > ...winston > ms-mvp windows live mail > > > "Beejaysoo" <beejaysoo@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:e5zSBfRjIHA.4744@xxxxxx Quote: >> As I get more familiar with WLM, I find several enhanced features to use >> when creating and sending emails. Lots of options when sending >> photos....borders, layouts, added text, etc. I'm wondering what the >> receivers see if they don't have WLM. I'd like to dress up my emails but >> if the receiver can't receive them or they become a real mess at the >> other end I don't want to do that. I guess even stationary and emoticons >> could cause problems for some systems? >> >> Any comments would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> bj |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Receiving WLM emails at the other end Tools/Options Click on the ? mark in the upper right Once the online help loads enter the following in the search box What do I need to know about photo e-mails? Look at the other help topics..it should provide a better understanding than I(who seldom mails photos) can provide. -- ...winston ms-mvp windows live mail "Beejaysoo" <beejaysoo@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uoKEIlejIHA.4376@xxxxxx Quote: > One thing I have been told by two recipients is that although they are given > the option to view photos as a slideshow...that doesn't seem to work when > they click on it. I'm using feature where photos are sent in high > resolution with thumbnail in email and pictures held on MS server. I would > assume when recipients choose to see photos that they would be directed to > that server where slideshow would be viewed???? > > Thanks, > > bj > > > "...winston" <winstonmvp@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:A16A74A1-09FC-4308-96B2-EA7C67AEE272@xxxxxx Quote: >> To add to Noel's response.. >> In some rare cases, the recipient, based on their client and isp may >> sometimes see something different than what is transmitted. >> e.g. A recipient's isp may have options configurable via the email account >> on the web site that takes first priority over the local client(filtering, >> plain text features). >> Normally what you see is what they get provided they have the same mail >> viewing capability as your mail client's creation. >> >> Note: A recipients client may override what you view prior to >> sending..ie.. recipient is set to read all in plain text, pictures and >> html not downloaded due to the recipient(s) local client security >> constraints. >> >> In a similar vane...what you see may be different, especially in cases >> where a sender is using Outlook's Rich Text format. >> >> The only certain way to find out is to ask the recipient. >> -- >> ...winston >> ms-mvp windows live mail >> >> >> "Beejaysoo" <beejaysoo@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:e5zSBfRjIHA.4744@xxxxxx Quote: >>> As I get more familiar with WLM, I find several enhanced features to use >>> when creating and sending emails. Lots of options when sending >>> photos....borders, layouts, added text, etc. I'm wondering what the >>> receivers see if they don't have WLM. I'd like to dress up my emails but >>> if the receiver can't receive them or they become a real mess at the >>> other end I don't want to do that. I guess even stationary and emoticons >>> could cause problems for some systems? >>> >>> Any comments would be appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> bj |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Receiving Emails | Vista mail | |||
| receiving emails | Vista mail | |||
| not receiving emails | Vista mail | |||
| not receiving emails | Vista mail | |||
| RE: receiving emails | Vista mail | |||