![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Funny email replying quirk I have three email addresses set up in WLM -- two for myself and one for an employee who occasionally uses my computer. I have WLM set to only check for messages from my two addresses, leaving her email alone. Here's the weird thing: whenever she sends me an email and I reply to her, WLM automatically creates the reply *from her email address* so it's as if she is replying to herself. Needless to say this is confusing and unwieldy. I cannot figure out how to defeat this "helpful feature." Any ideas? brink |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: Funny email replying quirk THAT HAPPENS TO ME TOO!!!!!!!! See my message link dated 4-04-08 Using Multiple Hotmail Accounts REPLY PROBLEM "brink" <brinknospam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:65vheuF2iah8pU1@xxxxxx
| ||||||||||||
My System Specs![]() | |||||||||||||
| | #3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: Funny email replying quirk "brink" <brinknospam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:65vheuF2iah8pU1@xxxxxx
It will be in the Accounts, Properties. The message is arriving in "her" Inbox, so "she" should reply to it. If you want someone else to reply to it from there you will have to change the Accounts, Properties each time. Why can't she send her messages to you to one of *your* accounts? Then you wouldn't have any confusion. If you want the message to arrive in her Inbox too, perhaps she could use BCC there? Etc. HTH Robert Aldwinckle --- | ||||||||||||
My System Specs![]() | |||||||||||||
| | #4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: Funny email replying quirk "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:F4E13202-864D-4D5E-97F8-ECBEE194EA30@xxxxxx
Read this very carefully: she IS sending me messages to MY address, yet the problem still exists. Let me illustrate further: Two POP3 accounts: brink@xxxxxx (my address) and employee@xxxxxx (her address) She sends mail from her address employee@xxxxxx to MY address, brink@xxxxxx. I hit REPLY and WLM automatically generates a reply not from MY address, but from HER address, the employee@xxxxxx. And the problem is really exacerbated when she then replies to MY reply which is now coming from HER email -- she hits REPLY and ends up replying to herself. Obviously, this is a design flaw as no-one in their right mind wants to automatically reply from another's email address like that under ordinary circumstances. I'd just like to know how to bypass that particular bug, if at all possible... thanks. brink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
My System Specs![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | #5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: Funny email replying quirk I was able to duplicate your result. I believe this particular bug was discussed here a couple of months ago. All you can do is select the correct return address in the From line drop-down box. -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "brink" <brinknospam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:65vheuF2iah8pU1@xxxxxx
| ||||||||||||
My System Specs![]() | |||||||||||||
| | #6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: Funny email replying quirk "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uYdIrHgmIHA.1368@xxxxxx
brink | ||||||||||||
My System Specs![]() | |||||||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| replying to a forwarded email | jossg | Vista mail | 1 | 04-29-2008 12:57 PM |
| replying email adresses | peter | Vista mail | 2 | 11-20-2007 05:19 PM |
| replying uses my email address | steel horse | Vista mail | 0 | 11-05-2007 08:39 PM |
| replying and sending email | N.Graham | Vista mail | 1 | 04-01-2007 07:51 PM |
| Replying to an OWA email broken | vista_user2000 | Vista General | 2 | 02-06-2007 04:47 PM |