![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:12:58 -0500, Liviu wrote: Quote: > "N. Miller" <anonymous@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:13rrze2xzsce$.dlg@xxxxxx Quote: Quote: >> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:08:53 -0500, Liviu wrote: Quote: Quote: Quote: >>> "N. Miller" <anonymous@xxxxxx> wrote in message >>> news:ivhdr5nrbu7s$.dlg@xxxxxx Quote: Quote: Quote: >>>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:26:00 -0700, Maffysdad wrote: Quote: Quote: Quote: >>>>> Now we find that half the features we've got used to aren't there, Quote: Quote: Quote: >>> Identities. Quote: Quote: >> I have used them. They aren't such a deal breaker. Quote: > Didn't mean to imply they were literally a deal breaker. Just an example > of a simple useful facility "rationalized" away. annoying was the tendency to mingle messages of multiple Hotmail accounts in a single Identity. The only reliable cure I found was to add only one MSN Hotmail account per MSOE Identity. Beyond the need to keep MSN Hotmail accounts separated, I did not find Identities all that useful. So far, three Hotmail accounts with DeltaSync, and no sign of scrambling messages between them. Quote: Quote: >> The way Windows Live Mail works is to have each POP3 account as a >> separate entity. You don't need identities in that layout. You would >> set up your "Personal" POP3 account, and your "Work" POP3 account. Quote: > My 3 OE identities have between 2 and 5 accounts each. Also, the OE > address books are per-identity (with a wab /all option only when > needed). I don't see how that maps directly into the WLM paradigm. Does > that make WLM unusable? No. Does it take away an existing feature while > providing no equivalent (or better) functionality? Yes. the WLM Address Book as I type. "All conacts" show 180. Specific contact groups below that, showing various quantities less than 180. The ability to create arbitrary groups seems pretty flexible. I have not tested to see if I can make it always open set to a preferred group, other than "All contacts". It appears that the Address Book that opens is the one for the logged in Windows Live ID. I guess I need to fool around some more. Since I only intend to use WLM for Windows Live Mail, there are some things that I have not tested. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! I downloaded Windows Live Mail Desktop recently and I hate it. These are some of the reasons I've discovered so far: 1. I hate the way it imports all emails and accounts from Outlook Express without asking me first. 2. Also takes an AGE to install and doesn't display the progress pane. 3. I hate having each email account in a separate folder structure. I want the option of having emails all go into one folder and then having my "storage folder" separate to that. 4. Should be possible to put storage folder at the top. 5. I liked the Identity facility, ok it wasn't very secure but that's a choice people can make. It was very easy and quick to use. This is a big loss to my mind. 6. The Find facility in Outlook Express was very easy to use and worked well, eg chosing to search for a message by To, From, Subject field etc. Find in WLM looks far more complicated. 7. Using WLM with the keyboard is not NEARLY so easy as Outlook Express was. This is going to make it difficult for people who can't use a mouse, and visually impaired people using screen readers. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! Feedback is available from the WLM menu bar WLM\Help\Send Feedback(web) or https://feedback.live.com/default.as...=wlmaildesktop -- ...winston ms-mvp windows live mail "BCP" <BCP@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:19A37A82-3404-4BA0-9B80-0E826FC0E2E9@xxxxxx Quote: > I downloaded Windows Live Mail Desktop recently and I hate it. > These are some of the reasons I've discovered so far: > 1. I hate the way it imports all emails and accounts from Outlook Express > without asking me first. > 2. Also takes an AGE to install and doesn't display the progress pane. > 3. I hate having each email account in a separate folder structure. I want > the option of having emails all go into one folder and then having my > "storage folder" separate to that. > 4. Should be possible to put storage folder at the top. > 5. I liked the Identity facility, ok it wasn't very secure but that's a > choice people can make. It was very easy and quick to use. This is a big > loss to my mind. > 6. The Find facility in Outlook Express was very easy to use and worked > well, eg chosing to search for a message by To, From, Subject field etc. > Find in WLM looks far more complicated. > 7. Using WLM with the keyboard is not NEARLY so easy as Outlook Express was. > This is going to make it difficult for people who can't use a mouse, and > visually impaired people using screen readers. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! Yup, The lengthy import created the impression that WLM couldn't handle all my mail. I thought it was broken then I wondered where's my drive space going. I find WLM garish and it displayed all folders with flag message only, I'd have to change to hide read, or show all; tedium I'd rather not deal with. I'm sticking to OE (and XP) and might loose Hotmail. That's okay, I suppose, Gmail supports IMAP. "Maffysdad" <Maffysdad@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:216E5D4D-0A14-4351-83C7-1FD00E90CCF8@xxxxxx Quote: > Well, congratulations Microsoft... you've managed to do it > yet again, fixing > something that isn't broke!... > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! Hmmmph, why not switch Hotmail to Exchange and sell Outlook Lite. "Liviu" <lab2k1@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OUc%233MapIHA.524@xxxxxx Quote: > Quote: > > You are probably right, and so was I in calling it > "politics". > > Many users have also long demanded free POP and/or IMAP > access (which > gmail, for example, delivers) but that wish fell on deaf > ears. Now don't > get me wrong, I don't dispute for a second that MS has the > right to pick > and choose what services it offers for free. All I am saying > is that not > all changes mean progress, nor are they necessarily being > done for the > greater good of end users, so attempting to sell them as > such only adds insult to the injury. > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! How many run POP, IMAP and webmail on the same server? "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ehrwsvZpIHA.2256@xxxxxx Quote: > "Liviu" <lab2k1@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:eSfJF7YpIHA.3960@xxxxxx Quote: >> Quote: > > The fact remains that most users demanded (and the > competition delivered) > larger mailboxes. You are effectively proposing that > Microsoft maintain two sets > of mail servers, some handling WebDAV, and the rest for > DeltaSync. > I imagine that the economics for such a dual structure would > be prohibitive. > > -- > Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! Small outfits do. The larger ones use dedicated servers. Very large mail providers have a whole farm of mail servers. -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "no one" <no @ mail .com> wrote in message news:OXVERKUqIHA.1768@xxxxxx Quote: > How many run POP, IMAP and webmail on the same server? > > > "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ehrwsvZpIHA.2256@xxxxxx Quote: >> "Liviu" <lab2k1@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:eSfJF7YpIHA.3960@xxxxxx Quote: >>> Quote: >> >> The fact remains that most users demanded (and the competition delivered) >> larger mailboxes. You are effectively proposing that Microsoft maintain two sets >> of mail servers, some handling WebDAV, and the rest for DeltaSync. >> I imagine that the economics for such a dual structure would be prohibitive. >> >> -- >> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! Problem is, it doesn't work like it did in OE. Yes, the OE rules imported, but no, the behavior is quite different. So far, I could only get rules to work on my local ISP account - HughesNet - downloads. Rules did not work to move my downloaded Gmail emails to the appropriate folders in the same way that OE works. The Help files states that Gmail is considered POP3...and rules don't work on HTTP accounts...that said, the rules should work, but it doesn't. And by the way, Gmail is set for POP3 download and delete from server once downloaded. I think there is something wrong under the hood with the way WLM executes rules on a downloaded Gmail account. Regards, Ryder "Gary VanderMolen" <gary@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:e3tVDqYpIHA.4848@xxxxxx Quote: > AFAIK, WLM's message rules are identical to OE's message rules. > You do have to factor in things like Blocked Senders, Safe Senders, > and internal Junk E-mail filters. > > -- > Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) > > > "orygunguy" <orygunguy@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:BCCB35EB-116F-4E7F-A2FB-A0016BE5ADDC@xxxxxx Quote: >> Hey Maffy, >> >> If it helps...I'm with you...I liked the old O. E. product. This package >> looks as if they used an intern to write it. Let's talk about RULES, >> just RULES no other problems just RULES. I used O. E. Message RULES >> extensively to AUTO-SORT my mail. Unless I'm missing something LIVE MAIL >> doesn't appear to be sorting properly. Not only that I had to >> re-configure every sub-folder manually, no drag and drop! This appears >> we have gone back to Windows 386, it is not a very elegant program, it is >> sparse, works poorly and doesn't seem to have legacy features one would >> expect to have included in a new package. I am now looking for a new >> email frontend. If you find one let us know. Windows LIVE leaves me >> with a brain-dead feeling! >> >> >> >> "Maffysdad" <Maffysdad@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:216E5D4D-0A14-4351-83C7-1FD00E90CCF8@xxxxxx Quote: >>> Well, congratulations Microsoft... you've managed to do it yet again, >>> fixing >>> something that isn't broke!... >>> >>> First you stop new Hotmail accounts from using Outlook Express to access >>> their email. >>> >>> You TRIED to stop long time hotmail users previously from using Outlook >>> Express at the same time as the above, but we all strongly objected. >>> >>> Next you then stop users who haven't accessed their Hotmail via Outlook >>> Express after what was it, 90 days. >>> >>> Now you've managed to fulfill your goal... Congratulation!... >>> >>> Now we find that half the features we've got used to aren't there, those >>> that are are much, much more complex to set up, if it's even possible!. >>> >>> On top of that you remove security features such as the "Identity >>> Login", >>> informing us that we must create an individual login account. >>> Wonderful!... >>> One computer, 20 users, 20 accounts... Previously one computer, 20 users >>> 1 >>> account, 20 identities... SO MUCH EASIER!!!... You're making technical >>> maintenance a nightmare... >>> >>> And I've hardly started... RULES!... Jesus!... What are you on!... >>> >>> Outlook was around since Windows 3.10 (that's before Windows95) if I >>> remember correctly... And it worked perfect!... Why can't we choose >>> between >>> the two, WL & OE... Our choice, not have it forced on us!... >>> >>> Why can't you just leave something alone when it works perfectly >>> already!... >>> Who else agrees, Please, write your comments... Good or bad, Agree or >>> disagree... I don't care... Just so long as MS actually take notice!... > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! It works on my gmail pop3 enabled account. It is the last rule in the sequence of all other rules, all others are stopped prior to the Gmail rule starting. It was currently set to move it to a separate user create folder within my Gmail account. I also changed to move to a user created folder in the Storage folders, works there too. Note: It does take a while for the unread counter to show up indicating I've an unread message regardless of the folder to which it is moved. My rule is setup as: Where the To Line contains my gmail address, then move it to the specified folder, then stop processing more rules? What criteria are you using ? -- ...winston ms-mvp mail "Ryder" <ryder@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uztScVaqIHA.2208@xxxxxx Quote: > Problem is, it doesn't work like it did in OE. Yes, the OE rules imported, but no, the behavior is quite different. So far, I > could only get rules to work on my local ISP account - HughesNet - downloads. Rules did not work to move my downloaded Gmail > emails to the appropriate folders in the same way that OE works. > > The Help files states that Gmail is considered POP3...and rules don't work on HTTP accounts...that said, the rules should work, > but it doesn't. And by the way, Gmail is set for POP3 download and delete from server once downloaded. > > I think there is something wrong under the hood with the way WLM executes rules on a downloaded Gmail account. > > Regards, > Ryder |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| | Re: Fixing something that isn't broke! Well, I don't use rules to move downloaded email to an email account's folder, never have used it for that purpose, except emails that come to our website...they go into the respective website folder for that domain. My rules, since they executed on the OE inbox while downloading, are more geared to topic. Example: an incoming travel reservation where the From is from AirlinesA, subject is "reservation confirmation" move to AirlinesA folder, and stop processing more rules. In OE, works without a hitch. In WLM, I select the rule to execute and the folder to execute on, the move to folder is located in the Storage Folder area...since this is where WLM imported all my folders. However, the rule shows it's executing, but nothing happens. The email is still in the source folder/account. By the way, WLM dumped unprocessed rules into the first email account it found, so that's where I point the rule to execute on, not the gmail account, since there's nothing in there. Another type of rule is based on the sender, an example is a rule to move all my daughter's incoming emails to her folder, where the From lists all her email accounts, and the move to is her folder name, and stop processing more rules. In OE, this works fine. In WLM, selected the rule, selected the folder to apply to, but the email sits in the same place and never moves. The first rule I tested that didn't work....on the account WLM imported unprocessed email was a rule to delete emails from a specific company, where From is CompanyA, delete, stop processing more rules....created in WLM...and it didn't work. The same rule created in OE works. That's what got me started on testing my imported OE rules and creating new rules in WLM. Out of curiosity, I created a rule to move my hughesnet email to an existing hughesnet folder located in the Storage Folder area, and that rule worked just fine. I do not have my email going to HughesNet since their connection to internet and email servers is too unreliable, so all my email gets forwarded to Gmail and downloaded from there. The only reason I had an email from HughesNet to test with is because they sent out a notice to their customers. Otherwise, I would have had to test send an email to hughesnet. Anyway, the point is that the rules seem to execute on my ISP emails, not on any of my imported gmail emails. I have not checked my gmail account for new email to test with, maybe that's what I need to do. It shouldn't matter whether the email is imported or freshly downloaded...to test a rule. Anyway, I'll play more with it when I get the time, in the meantime, am still using OE as the primary until I see certain things working the way I think they should in WLM. Thanks for your input and comments. Regards, Ryder "...winston" <winstonmvp@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:4FC1571A-5C60-4B60-B8AD-B910A1A036D3@xxxxxx Quote: > It works on my gmail pop3 enabled account. It is the last rule in the > sequence of all other rules, all others are stopped prior to > the Gmail rule starting. > > It was currently set to move it to a separate user create folder within my > Gmail account. > I also changed to move to a user created folder in the Storage folders, > works there too. > > Note: It does take a while for the unread counter to show up indicating > I've an unread message regardless of the folder to which it is moved. > > My rule is setup as: > Where the To Line contains my gmail address, then move it to the specified > folder, then stop processing more rules? > > What criteria are you using ? > -- > ...winston > ms-mvp mail > > > "Ryder" <ryder@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:uztScVaqIHA.2208@xxxxxx Quote: >> Problem is, it doesn't work like it did in OE. Yes, the OE rules >> imported, but no, the behavior is quite different. So far, I >> could only get rules to work on my local ISP account - HughesNet - >> downloads. Rules did not work to move my downloaded Gmail >> emails to the appropriate folders in the same way that OE works. >> >> The Help files states that Gmail is considered POP3...and rules don't >> work on HTTP accounts...that said, the rules should work, >> but it doesn't. And by the way, Gmail is set for POP3 download and >> delete from server once downloaded. >> >> I think there is something wrong under the hood with the way WLM executes >> rules on a downloaded Gmail account. >> >> Regards, >> Ryder > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| pc broke :/ | Chillout Room | |||
| Folders: If It Ain't Broke, DON'T FIX IT!! | Vista General | |||
| My laptop broke :( | Vista General | |||
| Vista Help is Broke | Vista General | |||
| broke Office | Vista installation & setup | |||