![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Contacts storage? Where does WLM store your Contacts? Vista introduced a top-level folder (under the username) called 'Contacts'. This is so much better than storing your contacts under 'Application Data', because it makes them easier to back up. Windows Mail uses the Contacts folder. Windows Live Mail, however, doesn't, thus rendering the new folder structure in Vista obsolete just months after launch! In fact, as far as I can see, if you switch from WM to WLM the Vista '\username\Contacts' folder isn't used by anything, which seems very odd. Anyway, can anyone tell me where WLM stores its Contacts? Or is there a way, perhaps, of forcing it to use the Contacts folder? Thanks, SteveT |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Contacts storage? In your Store folder ([Tools >] Options > Advanced > Maintenance > Store folder). There is a subfolder called Contacts, containing subfolders for each Live ID and a Default folder if you've never signed in. In each Live ID folder is a pair of folders, real and shadow. One of them reflects the local situation, the other that at contacts.live.com. After a complete synchronization, they should contain identical contacts entries. This makes it easy to back up: nearly all user data - messages and contacts - in one handy folder. -- Noel "Steve Thackery" <nobody@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OJp1PLSqIHA.2292@xxxxxx Quote: > Where does WLM store your Contacts? > > Vista introduced a top-level folder (under the username) called > 'Contacts'. This is so much better than storing your contacts > under 'Application Data', because it makes them easier to back up. > > Windows Mail uses the Contacts folder. Windows Live Mail, > however, doesn't, thus rendering the new folder structure in Vista > obsolete just months after launch! > > In fact, as far as I can see, if you switch from WM to WLM the > Vista '\username\Contacts' folder isn't used by anything, which > seems very odd. > > Anyway, can anyone tell me where WLM stores its Contacts? Or is > there a way, perhaps, of forcing it to use the Contacts folder? > > Thanks, > > SteveT |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Contacts storage? Not so sure that Microsoft intended that location as an "easy" backup means. By default, the AppData directory is hidden. -- Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail) "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uz1VaaSqIHA.4912@xxxxxx Quote: > In your Store folder ([Tools >] Options > Advanced > Maintenance > Store folder). There is a subfolder called Contacts, > containing subfolders for each Live ID and a Default folder if you've never signed in. In each Live ID folder is a pair of > folders, real and shadow. One of them reflects the local situation, the other that at contacts.live.com. After a complete > synchronization, they should contain identical contacts entries. This makes it easy to back up: nearly all user data - messages > and contacts - in one handy folder. > -- > Noel > > "Steve Thackery" <nobody@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OJp1PLSqIHA.2292@xxxxxx Quote: >> Where does WLM store your Contacts? >> >> Vista introduced a top-level folder (under the username) called 'Contacts'. This is so much better than storing your contacts >> under 'Application Data', because it makes them easier to back up. >> >> Windows Mail uses the Contacts folder. Windows Live Mail, however, doesn't, thus rendering the new folder structure in Vista >> obsolete just months after launch! >> >> In fact, as far as I can see, if you switch from WM to WLM the Vista '\username\Contacts' folder isn't used by anything, which >> seems very odd. >> >> Anyway, can anyone tell me where WLM stores its Contacts? Or is there a way, perhaps, of forcing it to use the Contacts >> folder? >> >> Thanks, >> >> SteveT > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Contacts storage? VERY helpful answer! Many thanks, Ildhund. SteveT |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Contacts storage? Supplementary question Mr Speaker In Vista when I double click on a shared OE contacts "folder" (NAB) on another machine (XP), it automagically copies the content thereof into the <my>\Contacts "folder". I can then select one or many names from <my>\Contacts, right click select Action->Send Email and the WLM compose window appears - all good stuff - if that's what you want to do. What I would like to do is to have a shared NAB that members of a "workgroup" can access and update from within their mail client (WLM, OE or Eudora) "alongside" their private Contacts/NAB. Obviously the shared NAB would have to be on a "switched on" PC and it would have to be shared with other workgroup members. Preferably I'd like one copy of the shared NAB - i.e. no replicants. I can probably nudge/bribe/coerce the OE and Eudora users into using WLM if I could deliver shared NABs - the users in question are autonomous so they cannot be forced via corporate fiat.. Can WLM have multiple sets of Contacts - it doesn't appear so. Which seems somewhat short sighted given that the much maligned Lotus Notes allowed multiple NAB's (or whatever it called them) 15 years ago. How do users cope with having a corporate NAB and a private set of Contacts in a WLM mail client situation - Exchange Server is not an option in the situation that I have in mind. Thanks PhilD "Steve Thackery" <nobody@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OJp1PLSqIHA.2292@xxxxxx Quote: > Where does WLM store your Contacts? > > Vista introduced a top-level folder (under the username) called > 'Contacts'. This is so much better than storing your contacts under > 'Application Data', because it makes them easier to back up. > > Windows Mail uses the Contacts folder. Windows Live Mail, however, > doesn't, thus rendering the new folder structure in Vista obsolete just > months after launch! > > In fact, as far as I can see, if you switch from WM to WLM the Vista > '\username\Contacts' folder isn't used by anything, which seems very odd. > > Anyway, can anyone tell me where WLM stores its Contacts? Or is there a > way, perhaps, of forcing it to use the Contacts folder? > > Thanks, > > SteveT > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Contacts storage? As I wrote a couple of days ago: set up a new Hotmail Live ID for the workgroup and populate its contacts with those common to the workgroup. You won't have to bother about copying contacts from one user account to another if the user has internet access, and it's quick and easy to switch the sign-in ID from personal to workgroup and have the appropriate contacts available in each case. "Can WLM have multiple sets of Contacts - it doesn't appear so. Which seems somewhat short sighted..." You have as many sets of contacts as you like - one for each Live ID. -- Noel "Urbane.Tiger" <viking.warrior@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:eOCI77eqIHA.4672@xxxxxx Quote: > Supplementary question Mr Speaker > > In Vista when I double click on a shared OE contacts "folder" > (NAB) on another machine (XP), it automagically copies the content > thereof into the <my>\Contacts "folder". I can then select one or > many names from <my>\Contacts, right click select Action->Send > Email and the WLM compose window appears - all good stuff - if > that's what you want to do. > > What I would like to do is to have a shared NAB that members of a > "workgroup" can access and update from within their mail client > (WLM, OE or Eudora) "alongside" their private Contacts/NAB. > Obviously the shared NAB would have to be on a "switched on" PC > and it would have to be shared with other workgroup members. > Preferably I'd like one copy of the shared NAB - i.e. no > replicants. > > I can probably nudge/bribe/coerce the OE and Eudora users into > using WLM if I could deliver shared NABs - the users in question > are autonomous so they cannot be forced via corporate fiat.. > > Can WLM have multiple sets of Contacts - it doesn't appear so. > Which seems somewhat short sighted given that the much maligned > Lotus Notes allowed multiple NAB's (or whatever it called them) 15 > years ago. How do users cope with having a corporate NAB and a > private set of Contacts in a WLM mail client situation - Exchange > Server is not an option in the situation that I have in mind. > > Thanks PhilD > > > > > > "Steve Thackery" <nobody@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:OJp1PLSqIHA.2292@xxxxxx Quote: >> Where does WLM store your Contacts? >> >> Vista introduced a top-level folder (under the username) called >> 'Contacts'. This is so much better than storing your contacts >> under 'Application Data', because it makes them easier to back >> up. >> >> Windows Mail uses the Contacts folder. Windows Live Mail, >> however, doesn't, thus rendering the new folder structure in >> Vista obsolete just months after launch! >> >> In fact, as far as I can see, if you switch from WM to WLM the >> Vista '\username\Contacts' folder isn't used by anything, which >> seems very odd. >> >> Anyway, can anyone tell me where WLM stores its Contacts? Or is >> there a way, perhaps, of forcing it to use the Contacts folder? >> >> Thanks, >> >> SteveT >> |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Contacts Disappear from WLM Contacts & Duplicate Contacts Appearin | Live Mail | |||
| questions reguarding offline storage and contacts | Live Messenger | |||
| Storage Location of WLM Desktop Contacts | Live Mail | |||
| WLM - some emails (even from contacts) ending up in Storage Folder | Live Mail | |||
| not enought storage storage is available error to open networked f | Vista networking & sharing | |||