![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | GUI colours missing Prompted by several posts about readability, I played around with accessibility options and XP's display properties to see if there was any combination that would, for example, boost the size of the text in the Folder pane and Message list, and make the selected folder more visible. I seem to have achieved both objects, but I'm not sure how, and as a side effect I've lost a good deal of (largely extraneous) background colour in various bits of the UI. The attached screenshots show my anaemic toolbar and the invisible text-entry boxes in both Find a message and a compose window's header fields. Altering the colour scheme using the paintbrush icon now has zero effect - the toolbar remains stubbornly white, which is in fact fine, but it has no bottom border and flows seamlessly into the rest of the window. This interesting colour scheme survives reboots. High contrast is off, my display theme is Windows XP and my Windows and buttons display setting is Windows XP style. So, somehow, applying High contrast has triggered fundamental changes in the system which don't get reset by either deselecting High contrast or rebooting. Incidentally, this also affects the appearance of HTML pages in IE7, where my settings are pretty bog-standard. Does anyone know what has happened? -- Noel |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing So are you saying that at this point your WLM and IE7 are affected, but other programs are back to normal? I'm not sure about IE7, but in IE6 there are settings on Tools, Internet Options, General for COLORS and ACCESSIBILITY Similar options in IE7 may have gotten enabled. In my IE6 the Colors are set to use Windows Colors and Accessibility options are all unchecked. -- Mike - http://pages.prodigy.net/michael_santovec/techhelp.htm "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uwrHBmOwIHA.5124@xxxxxx Quote: > Prompted by several posts about readability, I played around with > accessibility options and XP's display properties to see if there > was any combination that would, for example, boost the size of the > text in the Folder pane and Message list, and make the selected > folder more visible. > I seem to have achieved both objects, but I'm not sure how, and as a > side effect I've lost a good deal of (largely extraneous) background > colour in various bits of the UI. The attached screenshots show my > anaemic toolbar and the invisible text-entry boxes in both Find a > message and a compose window's header fields. Altering the colour > scheme using the paintbrush icon now has zero effect - the toolbar > remains stubbornly white, which is in fact fine, but it has no > bottom border and flows seamlessly into the rest of the window. > This interesting colour scheme survives reboots. High contrast is > off, my display theme is Windows XP and my Windows and buttons > display setting is Windows XP style. So, somehow, applying High > contrast has triggered fundamental changes in the system which don't > get reset by either deselecting High contrast or rebooting. > Incidentally, this also affects the appearance of HTML pages in IE7, > where my settings are pretty bog-standard. > Does anyone know what has happened? > -- > Noel > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing IE7 has the same General options for Colors and Accessibility -- ...winston ms-mvp mail "Michael Santovec" <michael_santovec@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:e84DovPwIHA.1504@xxxxxx Quote: > So are you saying that at this point your WLM and IE7 are affected, but other programs are back to normal? > > I'm not sure about IE7, but in IE6 there are settings on Tools, Internet Options, General for COLORS and ACCESSIBILITY Similar > options in IE7 may have gotten enabled. In my IE6 the Colors are set to use Windows Colors and Accessibility options are all > unchecked. > > -- > > Mike - http://pages.prodigy.net/michael_santovec/techhelp.htm > > > > "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uwrHBmOwIHA.5124@xxxxxx Quote: >> Prompted by several posts about readability, I played around with >> accessibility options and XP's display properties to see if there >> was any combination that would, for example, boost the size of the >> text in the Folder pane and Message list, and make the selected >> folder more visible. >> I seem to have achieved both objects, but I'm not sure how, and as a >> side effect I've lost a good deal of (largely extraneous) background >> colour in various bits of the UI. The attached screenshots show my >> anaemic toolbar and the invisible text-entry boxes in both Find a >> message and a compose window's header fields. Altering the colour >> scheme using the paintbrush icon now has zero effect - the toolbar >> remains stubbornly white, which is in fact fine, but it has no >> bottom border and flows seamlessly into the rest of the window. >> This interesting colour scheme survives reboots. High contrast is >> off, my display theme is Windows XP and my Windows and buttons >> display setting is Windows XP style. So, somehow, applying High >> contrast has triggered fundamental changes in the system which don't >> get reset by either deselecting High contrast or rebooting. >> Incidentally, this also affects the appearance of HTML pages in IE7, >> where my settings are pretty bog-standard. >> Does anyone know what has happened? >> -- >> Noel >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing Thanks to you both. As I said, IE7 settings are more-or-less standard, with none of the accessibility features selected. I've since discovered how this has come about. I had, as well as using the keyboard shortcut to toggle High Contrast on and off, applied High Contrast at the XP accessibility options (in Control panel), so my curious display appearance is in fact High Contrast Windows Classic. The Control panel setting takes effect after a reboot, even though the setting had been toggled off before rebooting. These experiments have revealed two things of interest: (1) It is pretty haphazard which fonts get used in WLMail when toggling High Contrast on and off. It seems to want to use MS Sans Serif, whereas MSFT told us several months ago that the fall-back from Segoe UI on XP is Arial. It takes a reboot to restore the font. (2) There are several areas of the UI that render poorly in High Contrast. In particular, input boxes that are defined only by shading disappear, as my screenshots showed. This is different in Contacts windows, where each box has a thin black border (screenshot). Other bits are missing some or all borders. Still, I end up with a delightfully uncluttered and legible screen. -- Noel "...winston" <winstonmvp@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OUpqaAWwIHA.4736@xxxxxx Quote: > IE7 has the same General options for Colors and Accessibility Quote: > "Michael Santovec" <michael_santovec@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:e84DovPwIHA.1504@xxxxxx Quote: >> So are you saying that at this point your WLM and IE7 are >> affected, but other programs are back to normal? >> >> I'm not sure about IE7, but in IE6 there are settings on Tools, >> Internet Options, General for COLORS and ACCESSIBILITY Similar >> options in IE7 may have gotten enabled. In my IE6 the Colors are >> set to use Windows Colors and Accessibility options are all >> unchecked. Quote: Quote: >> "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:uwrHBmOwIHA.5124@xxxxxx Quote: >>> Prompted by several posts about readability, I played around >>> with >>> accessibility options and XP's display properties to see if >>> there >>> was any combination that would, for example, boost the size of >>> the >>> text in the Folder pane and Message list, and make the selected >>> folder more visible. >>> I seem to have achieved both objects, but I'm not sure how, and >>> as a >>> side effect I've lost a good deal of (largely extraneous) >>> background >>> colour in various bits of the UI. The attached screenshots show >>> my >>> anaemic toolbar and the invisible text-entry boxes in both Find >>> a >>> message and a compose window's header fields. Altering the >>> colour >>> scheme using the paintbrush icon now has zero effect - the >>> toolbar >>> remains stubbornly white, which is in fact fine, but it has no >>> bottom border and flows seamlessly into the rest of the window. >>> This interesting colour scheme survives reboots. High contrast >>> is >>> off, my display theme is Windows XP and my Windows and buttons >>> display setting is Windows XP style. So, somehow, applying High >>> contrast has triggered fundamental changes in the system which >>> don't >>> get reset by either deselecting High contrast or rebooting. >>> Incidentally, this also affects the appearance of HTML pages in >>> IE7, >>> where my settings are pretty bog-standard. >>> Does anyone know what has happened? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:#ahsMZYwIHA.2360@xxxxxx Quote: > (1) It is pretty haphazard which fonts get used in WLMail when > toggling High Contrast on and off. It seems to want to use MS Sans > Serif, whereas MSFT told us several months ago that the fall-back > from Segoe UI on XP is Arial. It takes a reboot to restore the font. IE8b1 is making fonts in WLMail even more unbearable. E.g. I have had to start using Plain text for reading in order to have some control over them. I think I'm getting Arial then. Otherwise, I would get a too small Times New Roman (a serif font). BTW I've never figured out how to tell (easily) which font is used by any particular rendering. Any tips? ; ) --- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ule9cBawIHA.5448@xxxxxx Quote: > BTW I've never figured out how to tell (easily) which font is used by any > particular rendering. Any tips? ; ) No easy way, I fear, because the fonts you're likely to come across are very similar. The small 'a' is a good guide, but you'll normally have to check a couple of letters to be reasonably sure. At least in IE7+ you can screw up the zoom to assist in identification. One missing from this list is the Vista font Colibri, because I don't have it installed, so I wonder how MSHTML manages to render it. Segoe: a e g I J S Tahoma: a e g I J S Arial: a e g I J S MS Sans Serif: a e g I J S Verdana: a e g I J S -- Noel |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:O5gcZpawIHA.4952@xxxxxx Quote: > "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:ule9cBawIHA.5448@xxxxxx Quote: >> BTW I've never figured out how to tell (easily) which font is used by any >> particular rendering. Any tips? ; ) Quote: > No easy way, I fear, because the fonts you're likely to come across are very > similar. The small 'a' is a good guide, > but you'll normally have to check a > couple of letters to be reasonably sure. Quote: > At least in IE7+ you can screw up > the zoom to assist in identification. I've never noticed that so clearly before. Good tips! Quote: > One missing from this list is the > Vista font Colibri, because I don't have it installed, so I wonder how > MSHTML manages to render it. Presumably it picks the closest substitute available somehow? I think there should be a user level diagnostic trace which could be easily activated and inspected to make clear what tests are done and what the results are when fonts are picked or substituted. I have tried just using ProcMon to infer the same information but just got lost. Almost forgot to press Alt-Shift-H to see your examples. ; ) Thanks for these. It makes me wonder why I use Arial. E.g., perhaps I should try Verdana sometime too to avoid Arial's capital I and small l ambiguity. (I tried to type a lowercase I by itself and the darn WLMail spellcheck overwrote it! The lowercase l it leaves alone but with a red squigly line.) Robert --- Quote: > Segoe: a e g I J S > Tahoma: a e g I J S > Arial: a e g I J S > MS Sans Serif: a e g I J S > Verdana: a e g I J S > > -- > Noel > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:elAt2ydwIHA.552@xxxxxx Quote: > "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:O5gcZpawIHA.4952@xxxxxx Quote: >> "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:ule9cBawIHA.5448@xxxxxx Quote: >>> BTW I've never figured out how to tell (easily) which font is used by >>> any particular rendering. Any tips? ; ) Quote: Quote: >> One missing from this list is the Vista font Colibri, because I don't >> have it installed, so I wonder how MSHTML manages to render it. Quote: > Presumably it picks the closest substitute available somehow? I think > there should be a user level diagnostic trace which could be easily > activated and inspected to make clear what tests are done and what the > results are when fonts are picked or substituted. I have tried just > using ProcMon to infer the same information but just got lost. The only one of the bunch to have a curly 'g'. I've tacked it on at the bottom, so you can print the list out and pin it up on the wall alongside all the other tips and tricks that you're prone to forget. Then again, perhaps you don't have the font installed with either the right or the wrong name and it will render as something else again... -- Noel Quote: Quote: >> Segoe: a e g I J S Q >> Tahoma: a e g I J S Q >> Arial: a e g I J S Q >> MS Sans Serif: a e g I J S Q >> Verdana: a e g I J S Q >> Calibri: a e g I J S Q |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u1xAwtkwIHA.5580@xxxxxx Quote: Quote: Quote: >>> Arial: a e g I J S Q <FONT face=3DTahoma>Tahoma: a e g I J S Q<BR> </FONT>>> Arial: a e g I J = S Q<BR>>> </source> Alt-Shift-H. Quoted line showed up with a serif font. I wonder what one it was? <EG> --- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: GUI colours missing "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u1xAwtkwIHA.5580@xxxxxx Quote: > "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:elAt2ydwIHA.552@xxxxxx Quote: >> "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:O5gcZpawIHA.4952@xxxxxx Quote: >>> "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxx> wrote in message >>> news:ule9cBawIHA.5448@xxxxxx >>>> BTW I've never figured out how to tell (easily) which font is used by >>>> any particular rendering. Any tips? ; ) Quote: Quote: >>> One missing from this list is the Vista font Colibri, because I don't >>> have it installed, so I wonder how MSHTML manages to render it. Quote: >> Presumably it picks the closest substitute available somehow? I think >> there should be a user level diagnostic trace which could be easily >> activated and inspected to make clear what tests are done and what the >> results are when fonts are picked or substituted. I have tried just >> using ProcMon to infer the same information but just got lost. > <blush> The reason I couldn't find it is that it's called Calibri > </blush>. > The only one of the bunch to have a curly 'g'. I've tacked it on at the > bottom, so you can print the list out and pin it up on the wall alongside > all the other tips and tricks that you're prone to forget. Then again, > perhaps you don't have the font installed with either the right or the > wrong > name and it will render as something else again... «Calibri is a humanist sans-serif typeface family, best known as the new default typeface for the Microsoft Office 2007 suite of applications. It replaces the previous defaults Times New Roman (for Microsoft Word) and Arial (for PowerPoint, Excel and Outlook). Calibri is one of six new western (Latin, Greek and Cyrillic) ClearType Collection typefaces shipped with Microsoft Windows Vista, and is the first sans-serif type to be designated the default face for the word-processing application Microsoft Word. Earlier releases of Microsoft Word have used Times New Roman as the default typeface. Calibri was designed by Lucas de Groot for Microsoft to take advantage of Microsoft's ClearType rendering technology. In 2005, the typeface won an award in the Type System category at the Type Directors Club's Type Design Competition. It includes characters from Latin, Latin extended, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts. In a survey conducted by researchers at Wichita State University, Calibri was the most popular font for e-mail, instant messaging and PowerPoint presentations. It also ranked highly for use in website text. The survey asked participants to rate images of sample text in various fonts.» http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calibri People who prefer Calibri over Times New Roman and Arial are obvious victims of Microsoft's aesthetic brainwashing and hegemony. :^) Cheers, Earle |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| how to change the folder colours ???????? | Software | |||
| Noob question about colours | General Discussion | |||
| Restoring Colours to Programs | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Colours, date | Vista General | |||
| RawUI colours | PowerShell | |||