![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | WLM an improvement? I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems to have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red arrow for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find that I really miss those shortcuts. I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to swallow if we knew a reason. Tom |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx Quote: > I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM > seems to have dropped the standard toolbar which included things > like the red arrow for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the > Send/Receive icon? I find that I really miss those shortcuts. > > I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing > the product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if > Microsoft is listening? If there was a good reason for deleting > them, I wonder if anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the > bitter pill easier to swallow if we knew a reason. festering for weeks. It's been a hard week, so if I'm a bit cranky, forgive me. First, Tom: look back over the posts since 7 January. Most of them have been about what you're complaining about. Now, my view FWIW. I find the iconless layout much more visually satisfying than its predecessor. It has taught me that it's the position of the icon rather than its appearance that I rely on for navigation. I'm still hitting the one for Calendar when I want Contacts; I curse, click the red X to go back - and the app disappears. This variance in window function is to my mind a much bigger fault than the lack of icons - to the point where I wish that the nine remaining ones were taken away, too. With no icons, my screen is workmanlike and uncluttered. Colours don't bother me at all - I just select Black so that everything except highlighted folders and scrollbars is either grey or white. Admittedly, I use keyboard shortcuts a lot, but not exclusively. If I learn a new one, I'll probably use it. I work on a laptop, so it's not so far from keyboard to touchpad, and this probably makes a difference. But the idea of using a mouse to click a Delete button when I have a perfectly functional one on my keyboard is foreign to me. Similarly, I always use the spacebar to read posts and Ctrl-U to move between unread ones. My only gripe here is that I have not yet worked out which bit of the UI is going to be in focus after doing something. I end up just hitting Tab whenever Ctrl-U or the spacebar doesn't do what I expect it to do. The program font - SegoeUI - I find particularly unlovely, so much so that I have removed it from my fonts folder. Now everything displays uniformly in Arial - not terribly pretty either, but very workmanlike. My default font for reading is Arial Unicode, which I find very easy on the eye. So, for if I had the choice, I'd have the UI totally icon-free. The screenshot shows what my workspace normally looks like. -- Noel |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? The thing is, all people are different and have different preferences. Instead of removing functionality, the toolbar should have been made easier to customize. 3 options would be nice (like other programs have) with: Text only, Text + Icons, and Icon only. Even standard Windows Mail with Vista has three options plus options for Small & Large Icons. And Tom yes, I just upgraded to the new load last night with these changes and it is bugging the life out of me ;-). D |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? I suggested to Microsoft to remove the "Delete" text from the "X" delete button, since most people by now know/knew what icon does/did (I guess) but Microsoft instead decided to remove the icon! LOL I didn't like the new, icon-less toolbar, especially when it first came out, but in using it, I've gotten used to it. From time to time I do hit the wrong button -- well, LABEL -- but it's been less so now than before. I'm using XP and the visual differences between an all-icon toolbar in XP to an all-text toolbar in WLM (and other Windows Live programs) is very noticeable but when I look at screenshots of Windows 7 with all-text toolbars, I somehow, for some reason, like it :-) Sterling "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx Quote: > I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems to > have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red arrow > for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find that I > really miss those shortcuts. > > I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the > product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is > listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if > anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to > swallow if we knew a reason. > > Tom > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? "Sterling" wrote: Quote: > I suggested to Microsoft to remove the "Delete" text from the "X" delete > button, since most people by now know/knew what icon does/did (I guess) but > Microsoft instead decided to remove the icon! LOL > > I didn't like the new, icon-less toolbar, especially when it first came out, > but in using it, I've gotten used to it. From time to time I do hit the > wrong button -- well, LABEL -- but it's been less so now than before. > > I'm using XP and the visual differences between an all-icon toolbar in XP to > an all-text toolbar in WLM (and other Windows Live programs) is very > noticeable but when I look at screenshots of Windows 7 with all-text > toolbars, I somehow, for some reason, like it :-) > > Sterling > > "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx Quote: > > I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems to > > have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red arrow > > for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find that I > > really miss those shortcuts. > > > > I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the > > product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is > > listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if > > anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to > > swallow if we knew a reason. > > > > Tom > > > > with tooltips are the way to go man ;-). Hover over the delete and forward labels...really useful having the tooltip be the same as the button label...same thing for previous and next buttons in a message. Icons attract your eye better (at least mine) and the tooltip can help those that don't know what a big red X is for. D |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? Actually, I would think they could do it just like the have done for YEARS in a mainstream programs like Office (Word and Excel, etc.). They give you the option to either have it or not. In Word, if I go to View>Toolbars and either select (or not) Standard or Formatting, I can get the look I prefer. I don't like being forced (and paying for it) to accept something that is not comfortable for me. I wonder if they are planning on deleting the option to have or not have a Standard Toolbars in Office? Unfortunately, they are making it easier and easier to look at products other than Microsoft. Tom "Sterling" <Sterling@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uUX2OoygJHA.1184@xxxxxx Quote: > I suggested to Microsoft to remove the "Delete" text from the "X" delete > button, since most people by now know/knew what icon does/did (I guess) > but Microsoft instead decided to remove the icon! LOL > > I didn't like the new, icon-less toolbar, especially when it first came > out, but in using it, I've gotten used to it. From time to time I do hit > the wrong button -- well, LABEL -- but it's been less so now than before. > > I'm using XP and the visual differences between an all-icon toolbar in XP > to an all-text toolbar in WLM (and other Windows Live programs) is very > noticeable but when I look at screenshots of Windows 7 with all-text > toolbars, I somehow, for some reason, like it :-) > > Sterling > > "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx Quote: >> I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems to >> have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red >> arrow for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find >> that I really miss those shortcuts. >> >> I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the >> product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is >> listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if >> anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to >> swallow if we knew a reason. >> >> Tom >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? "Don" <Don@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:30391246-79C7-4C43-873C-81E0E9BEF247@xxxxxx Quote: > > > "Sterling" wrote: > Quote: >> I suggested to Microsoft to remove the "Delete" text from the "X" delete >> button, since most people by now know/knew what icon does/did (I guess) >> but >> Microsoft instead decided to remove the icon! LOL >> >> I didn't like the new, icon-less toolbar, especially when it first came >> out, >> but in using it, I've gotten used to it. From time to time I do hit the >> wrong button -- well, LABEL -- but it's been less so now than before. >> >> I'm using XP and the visual differences between an all-icon toolbar in XP >> to >> an all-text toolbar in WLM (and other Windows Live programs) is very >> noticeable but when I look at screenshots of Windows 7 with all-text >> toolbars, I somehow, for some reason, like it :-) >> >> Sterling >> >> "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx Quote: >> > I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems to >> > have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red >> > arrow >> > for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find that >> > I >> > really miss those shortcuts. >> > >> > I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the >> > product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is >> > listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if >> > anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to >> > swallow if we knew a reason. >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > > Well for me, the new layout id just plain inefficient use of space. Icons > with tooltips are the way to go man ;-). Hover over the delete and forward > labels...really useful having the tooltip be the same as the button > label...same thing for previous and next buttons in a message. Icons > attract > your eye better (at least mine) and the tooltip can help those that don't > know what a big red X is for. > > D 'em and 2- I use them to ID sites) and I'm with ya on both accounts. I am used to the all-text toolbar, but I don't like it, at least not in XP. My XP toolbars are set to only icons, and all-text toolbar's text label takes up space. And lets not forget the visual when you enable the Menu bar -- two bars of nothing but text! I guess the "X" is better because I can tell my mom to click on the red X in the toolbar and she'll know which I am referring to, rather than telling her in Spanish a word that I don't know what it is. I don't know what "Delete" is in Spanish :-) Sterling |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? I like using Microsoft's products. I don't know if I'd call myself a "fanboy" but I am kind of an enthusiast, especially when it comes to Windows. I do look at other products when Microsoft doesn't quite deliever the goods, but for the most part, I first look at what Microsoft has to offer. This our way or go somewhere else (Re: Thunderbird) way of WLM I don't like. At least an option would be good but I don't think Microsoft will do that when it comes to the toolbar. I have noticed in some Windows 7 screenshots that when you click on a Word document, the Open label displays the Word icon. Sterling "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:eXy5QIzgJHA.4220@xxxxxx Quote: > Actually, I would think they could do it just like the have done for YEARS > in a mainstream programs like Office (Word and Excel, etc.). They give > you the option to either have it or not. In Word, if I go to > View>Toolbars and either select (or not) Standard or Formatting, I can get > the look I prefer. I don't like being forced (and paying for it) to accept > something that is not comfortable for me. > > I wonder if they are planning on deleting the option to have or not have a > Standard Toolbars in Office? Unfortunately, they are making it easier and > easier to look at products other than Microsoft. > > Tom > > > > "Sterling" <Sterling@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:uUX2OoygJHA.1184@xxxxxx Quote: >> I suggested to Microsoft to remove the "Delete" text from the "X" delete >> button, since most people by now know/knew what icon does/did (I guess) >> but Microsoft instead decided to remove the icon! LOL >> >> I didn't like the new, icon-less toolbar, especially when it first came >> out, but in using it, I've gotten used to it. From time to time I do hit >> the wrong button -- well, LABEL -- but it's been less so now than before. >> >> I'm using XP and the visual differences between an all-icon toolbar in XP >> to an all-text toolbar in WLM (and other Windows Live programs) is very >> noticeable but when I look at screenshots of Windows 7 with all-text >> toolbars, I somehow, for some reason, like it :-) >> >> Sterling >> >> "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx Quote: >>> I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems to >>> have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red >>> arrow for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find >>> that I really miss those shortcuts. >>> >>> I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the >>> product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is >>> listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if >>> anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to >>> swallow if we knew a reason. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? "Don" <Don@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:30391246-79C7-4C43-873C-81E0E9BEF247@xxxxxx Quote: > > > "Sterling" wrote: > Quote: >> I suggested to Microsoft to remove the "Delete" text from the "X" delete >> button, since most people by now know/knew what icon does/did (I guess) >> but >> Microsoft instead decided to remove the icon! LOL >> >> I didn't like the new, icon-less toolbar, especially when it first came >> out, >> but in using it, I've gotten used to it. From time to time I do hit the >> wrong button -- well, LABEL -- but it's been less so now than before. >> >> I'm using XP and the visual differences between an all-icon toolbar in XP >> to >> an all-text toolbar in WLM (and other Windows Live programs) is very >> noticeable but when I look at screenshots of Windows 7 with all-text >> toolbars, I somehow, for some reason, like it :-) >> >> Sterling >> >> "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx Quote: >> > I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems to >> > have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red >> > arrow >> > for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find that >> > I >> > really miss those shortcuts. >> > >> > I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the >> > product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is >> > listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if >> > anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to >> > swallow if we knew a reason. >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > > Well for me, the new layout id just plain inefficient use of space. Icons > with tooltips are the way to go man ;-). Hover over the delete and forward > labels...really useful having the tooltip be the same as the button > label...same thing for previous and next buttons in a message. Icons > attract > your eye better (at least mine) and the tooltip can help those that don't > know what a big red X is for. > > D I right click, Delete. -- Ronald Sommer |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: WLM an improvement? "Sterling" <Sterling@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:eLyW8dzgJHA.1252@xxxxxx Quote: > > "Don" <Don@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:30391246-79C7-4C43-873C-81E0E9BEF247@xxxxxx Quote: >> >> >> "Sterling" wrote: >> Quote: >>> I suggested to Microsoft to remove the "Delete" text from the "X" delete >>> button, since most people by now know/knew what icon does/did (I guess) >>> but >>> Microsoft instead decided to remove the icon! LOL >>> >>> I didn't like the new, icon-less toolbar, especially when it first came >>> out, >>> but in using it, I've gotten used to it. From time to time I do hit the >>> wrong button -- well, LABEL -- but it's been less so now than before. >>> >>> I'm using XP and the visual differences between an all-icon toolbar in >>> XP to >>> an all-text toolbar in WLM (and other Windows Live programs) is very >>> noticeable but when I look at screenshots of Windows 7 with all-text >>> toolbars, I somehow, for some reason, like it :-) >>> >>> Sterling >>> >>> "Tom Brown" <NoSpam@xxxxxx> wrote in message >>> news:ehXP1cxgJHA.4880@xxxxxx >>> > I wonder if anyone else is "squawking" about the fact that WLM seems >>> > to >>> > have dropped the standard toolbar which included things like the red >>> > arrow >>> > for Delete, the Go Back arrow, and the Send/Receive icon? I find that >>> > I >>> > really miss those shortcuts. >>> > >>> > I don't consider deleting these items to be progress in developing the >>> > product. I wonder if anyone else is not pleased and if Microsoft is >>> > listening? If there was a good reason for deleting them, I wonder if >>> > anyone from MS has stated it? It might make the bitter pill easier to >>> > swallow if we knew a reason. >>> > >>> > Tom >>> > >>> > >>> >> Well for me, the new layout id just plain inefficient use of space. Icons >> with tooltips are the way to go man ;-). Hover over the delete and >> forward >> labels...really useful having the tooltip be the same as the button >> label...same thing for previous and next buttons in a message. Icons >> attract >> your eye better (at least mine) and the tooltip can help those that don't >> know what a big red X is for. >> >> D > Oh I'm all about icons (I hate it when IE removes favicons 'cause 1- I > like 'em and 2- I use them to ID sites) and I'm with ya on both accounts. > I am used to the all-text toolbar, but I don't like it, at least not in > XP. My XP toolbars are set to only icons, and all-text toolbar's text > label takes up space. And lets not forget the visual when you enable the > Menu bar -- two bars of nothing but text! > > I guess the "X" is better because I can tell my mom to click on the red X > in the toolbar and she'll know which I am referring to, rather than > telling her in Spanish a word that I don't know what it is. I don't know > what "Delete" is in Spanish :-) > > Sterling Saludos, Earle |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Is the script ok or does it need improvement | VB Script | |||
| Possible UAC Improvement | Vista security | |||
| Contacts in need of improvement | Vista mail | |||
| CPU utilization improvement | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| 2GB to 4GB, how much of an improvement? | Vista hardware & devices | |||