Vista - spam score = 1.3: why is this placed in the junk folder?

04-08-2009

I own a website that allows people to "email this page" to people. Time
after time my emails are placed in the WLM junk folder. What attributes of
the message could be causing this? Here is some header info from one of the
messages. Is 1.3 a high enough score to place in junk?? Even though the
test was "missing subject" each of these messages do indeed have subjects.

X-PhishingScore: 0
tests=

X-SpamScore: 1.3
tests= MISSING_SUBJECT NO_RECEIVED

04-08-2009

Since it appears that not all of them go there, then there must be some
difference at the receiving end. Maybe it would be easier to determine what
triggers it if you know what difference there is between those machines that
reject it and those that accept it?

"osu9400" <osu9400@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:#F4A9zFuJHA.3988@xxxxxx

Quote:

> I own a website that allows people to "email this page" to people. Time
> after time my emails are placed in the WLM junk folder. What attributes
> of the message could be causing this? Here is some header info from one
> of the messages. Is 1.3 a high enough score to place in junk?? Even
> though the test was "missing subject" each of these messages do indeed
> have subjects.
>
>
> X-PhishingScore: 0
> tests=
>
> X-SpamScore: 1.3
> tests= MISSING_SUBJECT NO_RECEIVED
>
>

--
Joseph Meehan

Dia 's Muire duit

04-08-2009	#1 (permalink)
osu9400 n/a posts	spam score = 1.3: why is this placed in the junk folder? I own a website that allows people to "email this page" to people. Time after time my emails are placed in the WLM junk folder. What attributes of the message could be causing this? Here is some header info from one of the messages. Is 1.3 a high enough score to place in junk?? Even though the test was "missing subject" each of these messages do indeed have subjects. X-PhishingScore: 0 tests= X-SpamScore: 1.3 tests= MISSING_SUBJECT NO_RECEIVED
My System Specs

04-08-2009	#2 (permalink)
Joseph Meehan n/a posts	Re: spam score = 1.3: why is this placed in the junk folder? Since it appears that not all of them go there, then there must be some difference at the receiving end. Maybe it would be easier to determine what triggers it if you know what difference there is between those machines that reject it and those that accept it? "osu9400" <osu9400@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:#F4A9zFuJHA.3988@xxxxxx Quote: > I own a website that allows people to "email this page" to people. Time > after time my emails are placed in the WLM junk folder. What attributes > of the message could be causing this? Here is some header info from one > of the messages. Is 1.3 a high enough score to place in junk?? Even > though the test was "missing subject" each of these messages do indeed > have subjects. > > > X-PhishingScore: 0 > tests= > > X-SpamScore: 1.3 > tests= MISSING_SUBJECT NO_RECEIVED > > -- Joseph Meehan Dia 's Muire duit
My System Specs

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum
Junk Email Not Going to Junk E-Mail Folder	Vista mail
Junk Email - How Many Days in the Junk Folder?	Live Mail
can't delete or junk spam e-mails	Vista mail
WinMail Junk mail and spam	Vista mail