Hi,
Why would you need to 'assign' anything to a specific core in general use? Windows will use
both by default, spawning threads on both. Although Messenger is well known for its lack of
threading in some areas, audio/video is a nice exception (it's done by another team).
Anything NT-based is SMP aware. Plus, Live Messenger only works on XP and above anyway.
--
Jonathan Kay
Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger
MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
MessengerGeek Blog:
http://www.messengergeek.com
Messenger Resources:
http://messenger.jonathankay.com
(c) 2008 Jonathan Kay - If redistributing, you must include this signature or citation
--
"thecreator" <thecreator@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OuovuSVWIHA.1184@xxxxxx
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> But don't you need Windows XP Professional; Windows XP Professional x64; Windows Vista
> Ultimate or Windows Vista Ultimate x64 bit version, to assign Live Messenger to a specific
> side of the Dual-Core Processor?
>
>
> --
> thecreator
>
>
> "Jonathan Kay [MVP]" <msnewsreplies@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:FAA2FB01-85F0-4BCB-9402-98922A70DA7C@xxxxxx
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Yep, the audio/video features of Messenger have always been threaded so a dual-core proc
>> will definitely assist.
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Kay
>> Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger
>> MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
>> MessengerGeek Blog: http://www.messengergeek.com
>> Messenger Resources: http://messenger.jonathankay.com
>> (c) 2008 Jonathan Kay - If redistributing, you must include this signature or citation
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> "thebigdintexas" <thebigdintexas@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:5618772A-027A-464F-9355-F7C613B992AB@xxxxxx
>>> I was just wondering if the latest Windows Live Messenger is designed to take
>>> advantage of a Dual-Core processor? All else being equal, and if not running
>>> any other programs besides WLM, would there be any benefit to having a
>>> Dual-Core processor during a video chat on WLM? >>
>> >
>