![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | SetColumnError Takes a Long Time to Execute I have a data table with ~1000 rows. I go through the rows one at a time, checking the contents. If I find a cell with an error, e.g containing null, I use SetColumnError on the data row to flag it. Here's my code: For Each dr As DataRow In MyDataTable.Rows Dim MyValue As Integer If dr("ID").Equals(DBNull.Value) Then dr.SetColumnError("ID", "ID cannot be null") ' this take 1 to 2 seconds each time Else MyValue = CType(dr("ID"), Integer) End If ... Next The problem is each call to SetColumnError takes about 1-2 seconds to execute. This is an ice-age, and if I have 100 cells to flag it takes 100 seconds to go through the data. Does anyone know why it takes so long for this method to execute? I am using VS2008 SP1 on XP SP3. I am targeting V3.5 of the framework, although I have V3.5 SP1 installed. This was a problem before I installed SP1 though. The back-end is SQL Server 2005, but the data are disconnected, so I can't see that being an issue. TIA Charles |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: SetColumnError Takes a Long Time to Execute Hi Charles, Takes in Brittain a second the same time as at the continent? :-) \\\ Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim a As New Stopwatch a.Start() Dim myDataTable As New DataTable Dim ID As New DataColumn("ID") myDataTable.Columns.Add(ID) For i As Integer = 0 To 100 Dim dr = myDataTable.NewRow dr("ID") = DBNull.Value myDataTable.Rows.Add(dr) Next For Each dr As DataRow In myDataTable.Rows Dim MyValue As Integer If dr("ID").Equals(DBNull.Value) Then dr.SetColumnError("ID", "ID cannot be null") ' this take 1 to 2 seconds each time Else MyValue = CType(dr("ID"), Integer) End If Next Console.WriteLine(a.ElapsedMilliseconds / 1000) Console.ReadLine() End Sub End Module /// Cor "Charles Law" <blank@xxxxxx> schreef in bericht news:%23E3yLXQFJHA.6052@xxxxxx Quote: >I have a data table with ~1000 rows. I go through the rows one at a time, >checking the contents. If I find a cell with an error, e.g containing null, >I use SetColumnError on the data row to flag it. > > Here's my code: > > For Each dr As DataRow In MyDataTable.Rows > Dim MyValue As Integer > > If dr("ID").Equals(DBNull.Value) Then > dr.SetColumnError("ID", "ID cannot be null") ' this take 1 to 2 > seconds each time > Else > MyValue = CType(dr("ID"), Integer) > End If > > ... > Next > > The problem is each call to SetColumnError takes about 1-2 seconds to > execute. This is an ice-age, and if I have 100 cells to flag it takes 100 > seconds to go through the data. > > Does anyone know why it takes so long for this method to execute? > > I am using VS2008 SP1 on XP SP3. I am targeting V3.5 of the framework, > although I have V3.5 SP1 installed. This was a problem before I installed > SP1 though. The back-end is SQL Server 2005, but the data are > disconnected, so I can't see that being an issue. > > TIA > > Charles > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: SetColumnError Takes a Long Time to Execute Hi Cor Good to hear from you. I tried your test, and it takes only a fraction of a second, so there is obviously something about my data table that is causing the problem. I've just had another thought: I am using the data table as the data source for a grid. I wonder if the fact that the grid is bound to the data table is what is making it so slow. I'll have to look into that. Cheers Charles "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <notmyfirstname@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:1F477A33-E6A9-4172-8DEA-29990C637A72@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi Charles, > > Takes in Brittain a second the same time as at the continent? > > :-) > > \\\ > Module Module1 > > Sub Main() > Dim a As New Stopwatch > a.Start() > Dim myDataTable As New DataTable > Dim ID As New DataColumn("ID") > myDataTable.Columns.Add(ID) > > For i As Integer = 0 To 100 > Dim dr = myDataTable.NewRow > dr("ID") = DBNull.Value > myDataTable.Rows.Add(dr) > Next > > For Each dr As DataRow In myDataTable.Rows > Dim MyValue As Integer > > If dr("ID").Equals(DBNull.Value) Then > dr.SetColumnError("ID", "ID cannot be null") ' this take > 1 to 2 seconds each time > Else > MyValue = CType(dr("ID"), Integer) > End If > Next > Console.WriteLine(a.ElapsedMilliseconds / 1000) > Console.ReadLine() > End Sub > > End Module > /// > > Cor > > "Charles Law" <blank@xxxxxx> schreef in bericht > news:%23E3yLXQFJHA.6052@xxxxxx Quote: >>I have a data table with ~1000 rows. I go through the rows one at a time, >>checking the contents. If I find a cell with an error, e.g containing >>null, I use SetColumnError on the data row to flag it. >> >> Here's my code: >> >> For Each dr As DataRow In MyDataTable.Rows >> Dim MyValue As Integer >> >> If dr("ID").Equals(DBNull.Value) Then >> dr.SetColumnError("ID", "ID cannot be null") ' this take 1 to 2 >> seconds each time >> Else >> MyValue = CType(dr("ID"), Integer) >> End If >> >> ... >> Next >> >> The problem is each call to SetColumnError takes about 1-2 seconds to >> execute. This is an ice-age, and if I have 100 cells to flag it takes 100 >> seconds to go through the data. >> >> Does anyone know why it takes so long for this method to execute? >> >> I am using VS2008 SP1 on XP SP3. I am targeting V3.5 of the framework, >> although I have V3.5 SP1 installed. This was a problem before I installed >> SP1 though. The back-end is SQL Server 2005, but the data are >> disconnected, so I can't see that being an issue. >> >> TIA >> >> Charles >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: SetColumnError Takes a Long Time to Execute Charles Law wrote: Quote: > Good to hear from you. I tried your test, and it takes only a > fraction of a second, so there is obviously something about my data > table that is causing the problem. > > I've just had another thought: I am using the data table as the data > source for a grid. I wonder if the fact that the grid is bound to the > data table is what is making it so slow. I'll have to look into that. Andrew |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: SetColumnError Takes a Long Time to Execute Hi Andrew I did try that and it didn't improve things. It seems that it is the fact that the data table is the data source for the grid. I set the data source to Nothing and the SetColumnError takes a fraction of a second. So, I create a copy of my data table to work on and then use the copy as the data source at the end. I couldn't really think of a better way. Cheers Charles "Andrew Morton" <akm@xxxxxx-press.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message news:6jrpplF4pe4sU1@xxxxxx Quote: > Charles Law wrote: Quote: >> Good to hear from you. I tried your test, and it takes only a >> fraction of a second, so there is obviously something about my data >> table that is causing the problem. >> >> I've just had another thought: I am using the data table as the data >> source for a grid. I wonder if the fact that the grid is bound to the >> data table is what is making it so slow. I'll have to look into that. > Maybe .SuspendLayout and .ResumeLayout on the grid would help? > > Andrew > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: SetColumnError Takes a Long Time to Execute Hi Steve I tried the Nothing thing before, which did work, but decided to make a copy instead to avoid the grid going blank during the process, but I appreciate it will take longer when the data table has many rows. I will try the BeginDataLoad though; that sounds like it could work. Cheers Charles "Steve Gerrard" <mynamehere@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ZpmdnVQFfMjx7UPVnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@xxxxxx Quote: > Charles Law wrote: Quote: >> Hi Andrew >> >> I did try that and it didn't improve things. It seems that it is the >> fact that the data table is the data source for the grid. I set the >> data source to Nothing and the SetColumnError takes a fraction of a >> second. So, I create a copy of my data table to work on and then use >> the copy as the data source at the end. I couldn't really think of a >> better way. >> Cheers >> >> Charles >> >> > Instead of SuspendLayout on the grid control, which really only effects > the positioning on the form, you might try BeginLoadData and EndLoadData > on the data table. This should turn off notifications during your > modifications, which might cut down on all the grid updating until you are > done. > > Rather than makiing a copy, I would also consider just setting the grid > datasource to nothing, modifying the table, and then reassigning it as the > datasource. > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Cmd takes long time to load | Vista General | |||
| Windows takes a long time to log off | Vista General | |||
| System takes a long time to boot | Vista General | |||
| Vista takes a long time from start to long in on SBS2003 network...... | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| setting flags takes a long long time | Vista mail | |||