Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Misc Newsgroups > .NET General

Vista - .NET 3.5 is not recommended?

Reply
 
Old 10-03-2008   #1 (permalink)
Sin Jeong-hun


 
 

.NET 3.5 is not recommended?

I had installed Windows XP. Now, I went to the Windows Update site. As
many of you already know, there is a category named "Software ,
optional". I could find .NET 1.1 (still there, after several years of
its release, and it is 2 generations old), and .NET 2.0. But I
couldn't find .NET 3.5 sp1 or .NET 3.5 or even .NET 3.0.

Then I thought, after installing .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 or .NET 3.5 might
appear at the optional software category, but it didn't. Only .NET 2.0
service pack 1 did, at the high priority category.

Why is that? Microsoft doesn't recommend .NET 3.0 or higher for
Windows XP? To distribute WPF applications, we need .NET 3.0 or later,
and yet, we cannot make users install .NET 3.0 or later from the
Windows Update.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-03-2008   #2 (permalink)
Ken Lemieux


 
 

RE: .NET 3.5 is not recommended?

I believe that .NET 3.0, 3.5 and 3.5 sp1 are extenstions to .NET 2.0. Unlike
..Net 1.0,1.1 and 2.0 where diffrences in the core libraries existed and
required updating.

Therefore, to deploy a WPF app, you must ensure the correct framework
version is installed as a prerequisite. I do this currently in my wpf
deployed applications using Clickonce. I even have control to retrieve the
installation from "the component vendores web site", Microsoft in this case.
--
Kenneth Lemieux
Project Engineer
Whelen Engineering Co., Inc.


"Sin Jeong-hun" wrote:
Quote:

> I had installed Windows XP. Now, I went to the Windows Update site. As
> many of you already know, there is a category named "Software ,
> optional". I could find .NET 1.1 (still there, after several years of
> its release, and it is 2 generations old), and .NET 2.0. But I
> couldn't find .NET 3.5 sp1 or .NET 3.5 or even .NET 3.0.
>
> Then I thought, after installing .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 or .NET 3.5 might
> appear at the optional software category, but it didn't. Only .NET 2.0
> service pack 1 did, at the high priority category.
>
> Why is that? Microsoft doesn't recommend .NET 3.0 or higher for
> Windows XP? To distribute WPF applications, we need .NET 3.0 or later,
> and yet, we cannot make users install .NET 3.0 or later from the
> Windows Update.
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-05-2008   #3 (permalink)
Marc


 
 

Re: .NET 3.5 is not recommended?

I think I read on an MSDN blog that 3.5 will be pushed out via Windows
Update November time, if I recall correctly.

Either way, any application that needs it will (or rather, should)
probably install it for you.

Marc
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Recommended DVD ripper Software
recommended 40 gig HD General Discussion
Recommended PSU Graphic cards
Re: Recommended AV program? Vista security
Recommended Motherboard General Discussion


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46