Windows Vista Forums

.NET 3.5 is not recommended?
  1. #1


    Sin Jeong-hun Guest

    .NET 3.5 is not recommended?

    I had installed Windows XP. Now, I went to the Windows Update site. As
    many of you already know, there is a category named "Software ,
    optional". I could find .NET 1.1 (still there, after several years of
    its release, and it is 2 generations old), and .NET 2.0. But I
    couldn't find .NET 3.5 sp1 or .NET 3.5 or even .NET 3.0.

    Then I thought, after installing .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 or .NET 3.5 might
    appear at the optional software category, but it didn't. Only .NET 2.0
    service pack 1 did, at the high priority category.

    Why is that? Microsoft doesn't recommend .NET 3.0 or higher for
    Windows XP? To distribute WPF applications, we need .NET 3.0 or later,
    and yet, we cannot make users install .NET 3.0 or later from the
    Windows Update.



      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #2


    Ken Lemieux Guest

    RE: .NET 3.5 is not recommended?

    I believe that .NET 3.0, 3.5 and 3.5 sp1 are extenstions to .NET 2.0. Unlike
    ..Net 1.0,1.1 and 2.0 where diffrences in the core libraries existed and
    required updating.

    Therefore, to deploy a WPF app, you must ensure the correct framework
    version is installed as a prerequisite. I do this currently in my wpf
    deployed applications using Clickonce. I even have control to retrieve the
    installation from "the component vendores web site", Microsoft in this case.
    --
    Kenneth Lemieux
    Project Engineer
    Whelen Engineering Co., Inc.


    "Sin Jeong-hun" wrote:

    > I had installed Windows XP. Now, I went to the Windows Update site. As
    > many of you already know, there is a category named "Software ,
    > optional". I could find .NET 1.1 (still there, after several years of
    > its release, and it is 2 generations old), and .NET 2.0. But I
    > couldn't find .NET 3.5 sp1 or .NET 3.5 or even .NET 3.0.
    >
    > Then I thought, after installing .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 or .NET 3.5 might
    > appear at the optional software category, but it didn't. Only .NET 2.0
    > service pack 1 did, at the high priority category.
    >
    > Why is that? Microsoft doesn't recommend .NET 3.0 or higher for
    > Windows XP? To distribute WPF applications, we need .NET 3.0 or later,
    > and yet, we cannot make users install .NET 3.0 or later from the
    > Windows Update.
    >

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #3


    Marc Guest

    Re: .NET 3.5 is not recommended?

    I think I read on an MSDN blog that 3.5 will be pushed out via Windows
    Update November time, if I recall correctly.

    Either way, any application that needs it will (or rather, should)
    probably install it for you.

    Marc

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

.NET 3.5 is not recommended? problems?

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AVG 9.0 not recommended cwl7454 System Security 13 25 Mar 2010
Recommended DVD ripper eggyuk Software 10 29 Dec 2008
recommended 40 gig HD gamblink General Discussion 1 05 Nov 2008
Recommended PSU eggyuk Graphic cards 14 10 May 2008
Recommended Motherboard eggyuk General Discussion 0 04 Jan 2008