![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | .NET 3.5 is not recommended? I had installed Windows XP. Now, I went to the Windows Update site. As many of you already know, there is a category named "Software , optional". I could find .NET 1.1 (still there, after several years of its release, and it is 2 generations old), and .NET 2.0. But I couldn't find .NET 3.5 sp1 or .NET 3.5 or even .NET 3.0. Then I thought, after installing .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 or .NET 3.5 might appear at the optional software category, but it didn't. Only .NET 2.0 service pack 1 did, at the high priority category. Why is that? Microsoft doesn't recommend .NET 3.0 or higher for Windows XP? To distribute WPF applications, we need .NET 3.0 or later, and yet, we cannot make users install .NET 3.0 or later from the Windows Update. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | RE: .NET 3.5 is not recommended? I believe that .NET 3.0, 3.5 and 3.5 sp1 are extenstions to .NET 2.0. Unlike ..Net 1.0,1.1 and 2.0 where diffrences in the core libraries existed and required updating. Therefore, to deploy a WPF app, you must ensure the correct framework version is installed as a prerequisite. I do this currently in my wpf deployed applications using Clickonce. I even have control to retrieve the installation from "the component vendores web site", Microsoft in this case. -- Kenneth Lemieux Project Engineer Whelen Engineering Co., Inc. "Sin Jeong-hun" wrote: Quote: > I had installed Windows XP. Now, I went to the Windows Update site. As > many of you already know, there is a category named "Software , > optional". I could find .NET 1.1 (still there, after several years of > its release, and it is 2 generations old), and .NET 2.0. But I > couldn't find .NET 3.5 sp1 or .NET 3.5 or even .NET 3.0. > > Then I thought, after installing .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 or .NET 3.5 might > appear at the optional software category, but it didn't. Only .NET 2.0 > service pack 1 did, at the high priority category. > > Why is that? Microsoft doesn't recommend .NET 3.0 or higher for > Windows XP? To distribute WPF applications, we need .NET 3.0 or later, > and yet, we cannot make users install .NET 3.0 or later from the > Windows Update. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: .NET 3.5 is not recommended? I think I read on an MSDN blog that 3.5 will be pushed out via Windows Update November time, if I recall correctly. Either way, any application that needs it will (or rather, should) probably install it for you. Marc |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Recommended DVD ripper | Software | |||
| recommended 40 gig HD | General Discussion | |||
| Recommended PSU | Graphic cards | |||
| Re: Recommended AV program? | Vista security | |||
| Recommended Motherboard | General Discussion | |||