Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Misc Newsgroups > .NET General

Vista - Failover Replication between 2 servers, best approach with 2008

Reply
 
Old 04-15-2009   #1 (permalink)
dtremain


 
 

Failover Replication between 2 servers, best approach with 2008

I am about to have to embark on a project that will provide failover
protection for a medical operation with 3 banch offices tied via a VPN, and I
don't know which way to go so I think I need some advice.

As it stands, they have a single Server 2003 domain controller which sits in
location "A" and provides file sharing, roaming profiles, print services,
DNS, etc for location "A", "B" and "C". This is the only server in the
domain, which has approximately 30 client computers to service.

This office is wanting to change their structure, and get a new server
running Server 2008, which will be placed in location "B". There is the
option to use some sort of 3rd party software like SOS Standby Server or
EverRun VM to run on the backup server to curve the possibilities of server
failure. Personally I would prefer to create a failover server that would
just pick up in the event that the PDC goes down.

What is the best approach for this? I would think file replication on a BDC
would be the best effort, provided by MS and not a 3rd party company.

Oh, one more note - the 2003 server would be upgraded to a 2008 to keep
uniformity between the two.

All input is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Dave T.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-16-2009   #2 (permalink)
Cor Ligthert[MVP]


 
 

Re: Failover Replication between 2 servers, best approach with 2008

Hi,

This are a lot of questions for simple developers who are active in this
newsgroup.
Like I saw that it had good result like Peter did, I redirect this message
using crossposting to the Microsoft.public.windows.server.networking
newsgroup.
Most probably a better place for this question, and if not then they can
probably help you further to a better place.

Cor

"dtremain" <dtremain@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0E9FC4C0-3E93-47E8-BA69-8CE1446EB347@xxxxxx
Quote:

>I am about to have to embark on a project that will provide failover
> protection for a medical operation with 3 banch offices tied via a VPN,
> and I
> don't know which way to go so I think I need some advice.
>
> As it stands, they have a single Server 2003 domain controller which sits
> in
> location "A" and provides file sharing, roaming profiles, print services,
> DNS, etc for location "A", "B" and "C". This is the only server in the
> domain, which has approximately 30 client computers to service.
>
> This office is wanting to change their structure, and get a new server
> running Server 2008, which will be placed in location "B". There is the
> option to use some sort of 3rd party software like SOS Standby Server or
> EverRun VM to run on the backup server to curve the possibilities of
> server
> failure. Personally I would prefer to create a failover server that would
> just pick up in the event that the PDC goes down.
>
> What is the best approach for this? I would think file replication on a
> BDC
> would be the best effort, provided by MS and not a 3rd party company.
>
> Oh, one more note - the 2003 server would be upgraded to a 2008 to keep
> uniformity between the two.
>
> All input is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>
> Dave T.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-16-2009   #3 (permalink)
Bob Lin \(MS-MVP\)


 
 

Re: Failover Replication between 2 servers, best approach with 2008

These how to may help.

Redundancy How toRedundancy How to. DNS redundancy. How to setup DFS
redundancy in Windows 2008 How to setup DHCP redundancy (50/50) on Windows
2008 ...
www.howtonetworking.com/server/redundancy.htm

Windows 2008 How toHow to setup DHCP redundancy (50/50) on Windows
2008 · How to setup DHCP on Windows 2008 · How to transfer FSMO in Windows
2008 DC ...
www.howtonetworking.com/server/w2008.htm



--
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
http://www.ChicagoTech.net
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
http://www.HowToNetworking.com


"Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstname@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u2NXuVlvJHA.4364@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hi,
>
> This are a lot of questions for simple developers who are active in this
> newsgroup.
> Like I saw that it had good result like Peter did, I redirect this message
> using crossposting to the Microsoft.public.windows.server.networking
> newsgroup.
> Most probably a better place for this question, and if not then they can
> probably help you further to a better place.
>
> Cor
>
> "dtremain" <dtremain@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:0E9FC4C0-3E93-47E8-BA69-8CE1446EB347@xxxxxx
Quote:

>>I am about to have to embark on a project that will provide failover
>> protection for a medical operation with 3 banch offices tied via a VPN,
>> and I
>> don't know which way to go so I think I need some advice.
>>
>> As it stands, they have a single Server 2003 domain controller which sits
>> in
>> location "A" and provides file sharing, roaming profiles, print services,
>> DNS, etc for location "A", "B" and "C". This is the only server in the
>> domain, which has approximately 30 client computers to service.
>>
>> This office is wanting to change their structure, and get a new server
>> running Server 2008, which will be placed in location "B". There is the
>> option to use some sort of 3rd party software like SOS Standby Server or
>> EverRun VM to run on the backup server to curve the possibilities of
>> server
>> failure. Personally I would prefer to create a failover server that
>> would
>> just pick up in the event that the PDC goes down.
>>
>> What is the best approach for this? I would think file replication on a
>> BDC
>> would be the best effort, provided by MS and not a 3rd party company.
>>
>> Oh, one more note - the 2003 server would be upgraded to a 2008 to keep
>> uniformity between the two.
>>
>> All input is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Dave T.
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-16-2009   #4 (permalink)
dtremain


 
 

Re: Failover Replication between 2 servers, best approach with 200

Thanks for the info Bob. And Cor, thank you for transferring it for me.

Typical office, they changed their minds on how they want to lay out the
network. Now it's going to be set up as 2 domains with little trust between
the two.


"Bob Lin (MS-MVP)" wrote:
Quote:

> These how to may help.
>
> Redundancy How toRedundancy How to. DNS redundancy. How to setup DFS
> redundancy in Windows 2008 How to setup DHCP redundancy (50/50) on Windows
> 2008 ...
> www.howtonetworking.com/server/redundancy.htm
>
> Windows 2008 How toHow to setup DHCP redundancy (50/50) on Windows
> 2008 · How to setup DHCP on Windows 2008 · How to transfer FSMO in Windows
> 2008 DC ...
> www.howtonetworking.com/server/w2008.htm
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
> http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
> http://www.HowToNetworking.com
>
>
> "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstname@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:u2NXuVlvJHA.4364@xxxxxx
Quote:

> > Hi,
> >
> > This are a lot of questions for simple developers who are active in this
> > newsgroup.
> > Like I saw that it had good result like Peter did, I redirect this message
> > using crossposting to the Microsoft.public.windows.server.networking
> > newsgroup.
> > Most probably a better place for this question, and if not then they can
> > probably help you further to a better place.
> >
> > Cor
> >
> > "dtremain" <dtremain@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:0E9FC4C0-3E93-47E8-BA69-8CE1446EB347@xxxxxx
Quote:

> >>I am about to have to embark on a project that will provide failover
> >> protection for a medical operation with 3 banch offices tied via a VPN,
> >> and I
> >> don't know which way to go so I think I need some advice.
> >>
> >> As it stands, they have a single Server 2003 domain controller which sits
> >> in
> >> location "A" and provides file sharing, roaming profiles, print services,
> >> DNS, etc for location "A", "B" and "C". This is the only server in the
> >> domain, which has approximately 30 client computers to service.
> >>
> >> This office is wanting to change their structure, and get a new server
> >> running Server 2008, which will be placed in location "B". There is the
> >> option to use some sort of 3rd party software like SOS Standby Server or
> >> EverRun VM to run on the backup server to curve the possibilities of
> >> server
> >> failure. Personally I would prefer to create a failover server that
> >> would
> >> just pick up in the event that the PDC goes down.
> >>
> >> What is the best approach for this? I would think file replication on a
> >> BDC
> >> would be the best effort, provided by MS and not a 3rd party company.
> >>
> >> Oh, one more note - the 2003 server would be upgraded to a 2008 to keep
> >> uniformity between the two.
> >>
> >> All input is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Dave T.
> >
>
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
WMI and file replication VB Script
Failover Guest Cluster -- 'The process cannot access the file becauseit is being used by another process.' Virtual Server
Is it possible to force remote replication in many servers using s VB Script
RE: DFS Replication Vista file management
RE: DFS Replication Vista file management


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46