This is important to some of us. Some kind of response would be awesome.

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:05:25 -0400, "Brandon Shell"
<tshell.mask@gmail.com> wrote:

>This is important to some of us. Some kind of response would be awesome.

Brandon,

I haven't seen a response yet to that thread on my newsreader.

It would also be very useful to know how much testing has been going
on using Vista. Personally, I have been concentrating on using
PowerShell Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.

Andrew Watt MVP

In message <rql7i29vegqv693vv7v5k2h9e98clduasj@4ax.com>, "Andrew Watt
[MVP]" <SVGDeveloper@aol.com> writes
>On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:05:25 -0400, "Brandon Shell"
><tshell.mask@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>This is important to some of us. Some kind of response would be awesome.
>
>Brandon,
>
>I haven't seen a response yet to that thread on my newsreader.

I suspect that's because MS hasn't issued one yet, and not a shortcomign
of Forte Free Agent 3.3.

>It would also be very useful to know how much testing has been going
>on using Vista.

Clearly not much since it's not installable.

I tested pre-RC1 version on Vista and they worked OK.

What is quite worrying is that just weeks from launch of Vista, a key
management application (PowerShell) can't install due to problems with
the installer. More proof that Vista simply is NOT ready for release
(which won't stop MS, but that's a separate story).

> Personally, I have been concentrating on using
>PowerShell Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.

I'd like to run PowerShell on Vista, because I want to run Vista on my
laptop.


--
Thomas Lee
doctordns@gmail.com
MVP - Admin Frameworks and Security