Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Donate Vista Tutorials Tags

Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
Register at Vista forums...the world biggest Windows Vista resource Join Vista Forums Now

Go Back   Vista Forums > Microsoft Technical Newsgroups > PowerShell

Provider Resolution?

Update your Vista Drivers Update Your Drivers Now!!
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2006   #1 (permalink)
Nick Howell
Guest


 

Provider Resolution?

I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as to
how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
<SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?

When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider named
'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.

Thanks,
Nick

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-04-2006   #2 (permalink)
Lee Holmes [MSFT]
Guest


 

Re: Provider Resolution?

Can you give an example of the command that fails? You can see the full
PowerShell path to an item this way:

PS:6 > (get-item c:\temp\test.txt).PsPath
Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\temp\test.txt

--
Lee Holmes [MSFT]
Windows PowerShell Development
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
news:upeCeb95GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as to
> how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
> <SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?
>
> When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider named
> 'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
> Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-04-2006   #3 (permalink)
Nick Howell
Guest


 

Re: Provider Resolution?

OK, I think my confusion was the difference between \ and / in that; is
this a bug?

ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\

works as expected

ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/

throws:

Get-ChildItem : Cannot find a provider with name
'Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem'.
At line:1 char:3

+ ls <<<< Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/


Should these behaviors be different?

Nick

Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
> Can you give an example of the command that fails? You can see the full
> PowerShell path to an item this way:
>
> PS:6 > (get-item c:\temp\test.txt).PsPath
> Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\temp\test.txt
>
> --
> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
> Windows PowerShell Development
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
> news:upeCeb95GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as to
>> how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
>> <SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?
>>
>> When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider named
>> 'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
>> Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nick

>
>

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-05-2006   #4 (permalink)
Lee Holmes [MSFT]
Guest


 

Re: Provider Resolution?

Currently, the separator between Snapin (ie: Microsoft.PowerShell.Core) and
Provider (ie: FileSystem) must be a back-slash.

This doesn't need to be this way, though. Please file a bug on Connect.

--
Lee Holmes [MSFT]
Windows PowerShell Development
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
news:OIiI18%235GHA.4304@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> OK, I think my confusion was the difference between \ and / in that; is
> this a bug?
>
> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\
>
> works as expected
>
> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>
> throws:
>
> Get-ChildItem : Cannot find a provider with name
> 'Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem'.
> At line:1 char:3
> + ls <<<< Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>
> Should these behaviors be different?
>
> Nick
>
> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>> Can you give an example of the command that fails? You can see the full
>> PowerShell path to an item this way:
>>
>> PS:6 > (get-item c:\temp\test.txt).PsPath
>> Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\temp\test.txt
>>
>> --
>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>> Windows PowerShell Development
>> Microsoft Corporation
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights.
>>
>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>> news:upeCeb95GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as to
>>> how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
>>> <SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?
>>>
>>> When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider named
>>> 'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
>>> Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nick

>>


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-05-2006   #5 (permalink)
Nick Howell
Guest


 

Re: Provider Resolution?

Bug filed. What about this:

> $r = resolve-path C:/
> $r.Drive -eq $null

False
> $r = resolve-path Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:/
> $r.Drive -eq $null

True

If you super-qualify (that's what I've taken to calling the
snapin-quaified path) the path, it doesn't have a drive. This popped up,
again, in my FtpProvider (particularly the CopyFs function, if you're
curious).

Nick

Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
> Currently, the separator between Snapin (ie: Microsoft.PowerShell.Core) and
> Provider (ie: FileSystem) must be a back-slash.
>
> This doesn't need to be this way, though. Please file a bug on Connect.
>
> --
> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
> Windows PowerShell Development
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
> news:OIiI18%235GHA.4304@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> OK, I think my confusion was the difference between \ and / in that; is
>> this a bug?
>>
>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\
>>
>> works as expected
>>
>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>
>> throws:
>>
>> Get-ChildItem : Cannot find a provider with name
>> 'Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem'.
>> At line:1 char:3
>> + ls <<<< Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>
>> Should these behaviors be different?
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>>> Can you give an example of the command that fails? You can see the full
>>> PowerShell path to an item this way:
>>>
>>> PS:6 > (get-item c:\temp\test.txt).PsPath
>>> Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\temp\test.txt
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>>> Windows PowerShell Development
>>> Microsoft Corporation
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>> rights.
>>>
>>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:upeCeb95GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as to
>>>> how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
>>>> <SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?
>>>>
>>>> When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider named
>>>> 'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
>>>> Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Nick

>

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-06-2006   #6 (permalink)
Lee Holmes [MSFT]
Guest


 

Re: Provider Resolution?

The Drive parameter refers to the PsDrive that your path specifies, not the
FileSystem drive of the target. The fully qualified path that you gave
below could easily map to a data store that has no PowerShell drives
configured.

For example:

[C:\temp]
PS:21 > new-PSDrive MyDocs FileSystem
([Environment]::GetFolderPath("MyDocuments"))

Name Provider Root
---- -------- ----
MyDocs FileSystem D:\documents


Suggestion: An alias for New-PSDrive is ndr
Suggestion: An alias for New-PSDrive is mount

[C:\temp]
PS:22 > $r = Resolve-Path mydocs:\
Suggestion: An alias for Resolve-Path is rvpa

[C:\temp]
PS:23 > $r.drive

Name Provider Root
---- -------- ----
MyDocs FileSystem D:\documents

--
Lee Holmes [MSFT]
Windows PowerShell Development
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


Since your example doesn't refer to a
"Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
news:%237hdAqN6GHA.2380@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Bug filed. What about this:
>
> > $r = resolve-path C:/
> > $r.Drive -eq $null

> False
> > $r = resolve-path Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:/
> > $r.Drive -eq $null

> True
>
> If you super-qualify (that's what I've taken to calling the
> snapin-quaified path) the path, it doesn't have a drive. This popped up,
> again, in my FtpProvider (particularly the CopyFs function, if you're
> curious).
>
> Nick
>
> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>> Currently, the separator between Snapin (ie: Microsoft.PowerShell.Core)
>> and Provider (ie: FileSystem) must be a back-slash.
>>
>> This doesn't need to be this way, though. Please file a bug on Connect.
>>
>> --
>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>> Windows PowerShell Development
>> Microsoft Corporation
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights.
>>
>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>> news:OIiI18%235GHA.4304@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>> OK, I think my confusion was the difference between \ and / in that; is
>>> this a bug?
>>>
>>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\
>>>
>>> works as expected
>>>
>>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>>
>>> throws:
>>>
>>> Get-ChildItem : Cannot find a provider with name
>>> 'Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem'.
>>> At line:1 char:3
>>> + ls <<<< Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>>
>>> Should these behaviors be different?
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>>>> Can you give an example of the command that fails? You can see the
>>>> full PowerShell path to an item this way:
>>>>
>>>> PS:6 > (get-item c:\temp\test.txt).PsPath
>>>> Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\temp\test.txt
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>>>> Windows PowerShell Development
>>>> Microsoft Corporation
>>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>>> rights.
>>>>
>>>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:upeCeb95GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as
>>>>> to how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
>>>>> <SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider
>>>>> named 'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
>>>>> Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Nick

>>



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-06-2006   #7 (permalink)
Nick Howell
Guest


 

Re: Provider Resolution?

I see; I guess I fundamentally misunderstand what the meaning of
provider-qualifying a path is. I had thought that it just got you a list
of all the drives in that provider...what precisely is it for, then?

Thanks,
Nick


Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
> The Drive parameter refers to the PsDrive that your path specifies, not the
> FileSystem drive of the target. The fully qualified path that you gave
> below could easily map to a data store that has no PowerShell drives
> configured.
>
> For example:
>
> [C:\temp]
> PS:21 > new-PSDrive MyDocs FileSystem
> ([Environment]::GetFolderPath("MyDocuments"))
>
> Name Provider Root
> ---- -------- ----
> MyDocs FileSystem D:\documents
>
>
> Suggestion: An alias for New-PSDrive is ndr
> Suggestion: An alias for New-PSDrive is mount
>
> [C:\temp]
> PS:22 > $r = Resolve-Path mydocs:\
> Suggestion: An alias for Resolve-Path is rvpa
>
> [C:\temp]
> PS:23 > $r.drive
>
> Name Provider Root
> ---- -------- ----
> MyDocs FileSystem D:\documents
>
> --
> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
> Windows PowerShell Development
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
> Since your example doesn't refer to a
> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
> news:%237hdAqN6GHA.2380@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bug filed. What about this:
>>
>>> $r = resolve-path C:/
>>> $r.Drive -eq $null

>> False
>>> $r = resolve-path Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:/
>>> $r.Drive -eq $null

>> True
>>
>> If you super-qualify (that's what I've taken to calling the
>> snapin-quaified path) the path, it doesn't have a drive. This popped up,
>> again, in my FtpProvider (particularly the CopyFs function, if you're
>> curious).
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>>> Currently, the separator between Snapin (ie: Microsoft.PowerShell.Core)
>>> and Provider (ie: FileSystem) must be a back-slash.
>>>
>>> This doesn't need to be this way, though. Please file a bug on Connect.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>>> Windows PowerShell Development
>>> Microsoft Corporation
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>> rights.
>>>
>>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:OIiI18%235GHA.4304@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>> OK, I think my confusion was the difference between \ and / in that; is
>>>> this a bug?
>>>>
>>>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\
>>>>
>>>> works as expected
>>>>
>>>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>>>
>>>> throws:
>>>>
>>>> Get-ChildItem : Cannot find a provider with name
>>>> 'Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem'.
>>>> At line:1 char:3
>>>> + ls <<<< Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>>>
>>>> Should these behaviors be different?
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>>>>> Can you give an example of the command that fails? You can see the
>>>>> full PowerShell path to an item this way:
>>>>>
>>>>> PS:6 > (get-item c:\temp\test.txt).PsPath
>>>>> Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\temp\test.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>>>>> Windows PowerShell Development
>>>>> Microsoft Corporation
>>>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>>>> rights.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:upeCeb95GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as
>>>>>> to how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
>>>>>> <SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider
>>>>>> named 'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
>>>>>> Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Nick

>
>

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-10-2006   #8 (permalink)
Alex K. Angelopoulos [MVP]
Guest


 

Re: Provider Resolution?

It's UNC-pathing; it simply provides a qualifier to describe the item domain
you're working in. For example, if I want to refer to the HKLM\Software
registry key without a mapped drive, I could just use:
Registry::HKLM/Software

You'll notice that this works as well:
Get-Item Registry::HKLM/Software/

So the <Name>:: simply means "the domain for the item that follows has to be
<Name>"

With the FTP provider, I would expect the following usages (using a name I
prefer, 'Howell\Ftp')

The PowerShell-universal syntax for referring to the Howell.Ftp provider
connected to ftp.microsoft.com would then be this:
Howell\Ftp::ftp.microsoft.com

The top-level "location"
"Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
news:OUY40OX6GHA.4608@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I see; I guess I fundamentally misunderstand what the meaning of
>provider-qualifying a path is. I had thought that it just got you a list of
>all the drives in that provider...what precisely is it for, then?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>
> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>> The Drive parameter refers to the PsDrive that your path specifies, not
>> the FileSystem drive of the target. The fully qualified path that you
>> gave below could easily map to a data store that has no PowerShell drives
>> configured.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> [C:\temp]
>> PS:21 > new-PSDrive MyDocs FileSystem
>> ([Environment]::GetFolderPath("MyDocuments"))
>>
>> Name Provider Root
>> ---- -------- ----
>> MyDocs FileSystem D:\documents
>>
>>
>> Suggestion: An alias for New-PSDrive is ndr
>> Suggestion: An alias for New-PSDrive is mount
>>
>> [C:\temp]
>> PS:22 > $r = Resolve-Path mydocs:\
>> Suggestion: An alias for Resolve-Path is rvpa
>>
>> [C:\temp]
>> PS:23 > $r.drive
>>
>> Name Provider Root
>> ---- -------- ----
>> MyDocs FileSystem D:\documents
>>
>> --
>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>> Windows PowerShell Development
>> Microsoft Corporation
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights.
>>
>>
>> Since your example doesn't refer to a
>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>> news:%237hdAqN6GHA.2380@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Bug filed. What about this:
>>>
>>>> $r = resolve-path C:/
>>>> $r.Drive -eq $null
>>> False
>>>> $r = resolve-path Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:/
>>>> $r.Drive -eq $null
>>> True
>>>
>>> If you super-qualify (that's what I've taken to calling the
>>> snapin-quaified path) the path, it doesn't have a drive. This popped up,
>>> again, in my FtpProvider (particularly the CopyFs function, if you're
>>> curious).
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>>>> Currently, the separator between Snapin (ie: Microsoft.PowerShell.Core)
>>>> and Provider (ie: FileSystem) must be a back-slash.
>>>>
>>>> This doesn't need to be this way, though. Please file a bug on
>>>> Connect.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>>>> Windows PowerShell Development
>>>> Microsoft Corporation
>>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>>> rights.
>>>>
>>>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:OIiI18%235GHA.4304@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>> OK, I think my confusion was the difference between \ and / in that;
>>>>> is this a bug?
>>>>>
>>>>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\
>>>>>
>>>>> works as expected
>>>>>
>>>>> ls Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>>>>
>>>>> throws:
>>>>>
>>>>> Get-ChildItem : Cannot find a provider with name
>>>>> 'Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem'.
>>>>> At line:1 char:3
>>>>> + ls <<<< Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/FileSystem::C:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Should these behaviors be different?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT] wrote:
>>>>>> Can you give an example of the command that fails? You can see the
>>>>>> full PowerShell path to an item this way:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS:6 > (get-item c:\temp\test.txt).PsPath
>>>>>> Microsoft.PowerShell.Core\FileSystem::C:\temp\test.txt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Lee Holmes [MSFT]
>>>>>> Windows PowerShell Development
>>>>>> Microsoft Corporation
>>>>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>>>>> rights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Nick Howell" <msnews-0.5.nlhowell@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:upeCeb95GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> I'm fixing up my FtpProvider, and I'm getting a *little* confused as
>>>>>>> to how providers are qualified now in a full PSPath; is it
>>>>>>> <SnapInName>/<ProviderName>::<DriveName:/<Folder>/<File> ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I try to use this, PS tells me that it can't find a provider
>>>>>>> named 'Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp/Ftp', and my snapin is named
>>>>>>> Howell.PowerShell.Provider.Ftp and my provider is named Ftp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Nick

>>


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WMI Provider Floridaguy Vista mail 13 12-14-2007 10:23 AM
WMI Provider Floridaguy Vista mail 0 10-12-2007 09:54 AM
Certificate Provider Joe G PowerShell 5 09-06-2007 11:00 AM
which provider is best ? acejase Vista General 3 06-18-2007 12:21 PM
SSL Protocol Provider hjkim.ajou@gmail.com Vista security 0 04-08-2007 11:41 PM


Vistax64.com is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media 2005-2008

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51