![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Allowing competing switches (no pun intended) with the switch statement Why are competing switches e.g. -regex allowed for a switch statement? I guess what I'm asking is why the coder is not forced to specify one of the available competing options? Thanks. Andrew Watt MVP |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Re: switch statement with regex to find IP but not with = | PowerShell | |||
| Intended shutdown takes forever | Vista General | |||
| Receiving mail intended for two recipients | Vista mail | |||
| Can the switch statement accept a "pipeline"? | PowerShell | |||