![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? Thanks for the response Andrew. "Andrew Watt [MVP]" <SVGDeveloper@aol.com> wrote in message news:lmjka2169ebv0h0tec4mfl7147iqo0pfb8@4ax.com... > Jon, > > For grep equivalence take a look at get-content with a where-object in > the second pipeline step. > > For example, you want to find lines in a file that match a regular > expression pattern: > > get-content filename | > where-object {$_ -match "regularExpressionPattern"} Would it be easy to search multiple files and print the names/paths of the files that contain a match? > Adapt as necessary. > > For tail take a look at the -first and -last parameters on > select-object. You would typically use it with a sort-object in the > preceding pipeline step to order objects according to the criterion of > interest. I don't know if this would work because what "tail -f" does is monitor the file for changes. Everytime text is appended to the file, tail prints the new text out. I was able to implement this using FileSystemWatcher in .NET. > I am not too familiar with "which" but from your description something > like Actually, I found that Get-Command seems to do exactly what UNIX which does. Basically, all you have to do is the following. PS C:\> get-command ping CommandType Name Definition ----------- ---- ---------- Application ping.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe > get-childitem Script1.ps1 | > format-list Name, PSParentPath > > should give you something similar to what you want. > > Andrew Watt MVP > Author - Professional Windows PowerShell (Wrox) > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:37:01 -0700, Jon Miller <Jon > Miller@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I'm just starting to play around with PowerShell. It seems pretty cool. >>There are a few things that I'm wondering though. Namely, I'm wondering if >>there are equivalents for UNIX commands grep, which, and tail. With regard >>to >>grep, I'm wondering if there are plans for an updated version of >>FINDSTR.EXE >>that is possibly more robust. I've also found the UNIX which command very >>valuable. It tells you where in your path an executable file is found. And >>also, tail with the -f flag is very valuable for viewing log files and >>having >>their output displayed as new output is written to them. I've created my >>own >>.NET implementations (in C#) of the later two commands, but, I was >>thinking >>it would be nice since there seems to be interest in finally getting a >>decent >>shell going for Windows that these other commands be bundled with the OS >>and/or the shell. >> >>Jon |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:12:39 -0500, "Jonathan Eric Miller" <jemiller@uchicago.edu> wrote: >Would it be easy to search multiple files and print the names/paths of the >files that contain a match? Here you go. Adapt as necessary. It shows filenames which contain one or more matches and also shows the line which contains a match. $files = get-childitem [fr]*.txt foreach ($file in $files) { if (get-content $file | where-object {$_ -match "red"}) { write-host "`n" write-host "$file" -ForegroundColor Yellow -Backgroundcolor Black } $lines = get-content $file foreach ($line in $file) { get-content $file | where-object {$_ -match "red"} } } Andrew Watt MVP |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? Thanks "Andrew Watt [MVP]" <SVGDeveloper@aol.com> wrote in message news:gf9oa29bj0k53bdrv4if23rdv8ef4dggvh@4ax.com... > On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:12:39 -0500, "Jonathan Eric Miller" > <jemiller@uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>Would it be easy to search multiple files and print the names/paths of the >>files that contain a match? > > Here you go. Adapt as necessary. > > It shows filenames which contain one or more matches and also shows > the line which contains a match. > > $files = get-childitem [fr]*.txt > foreach ($file in $files) > { > if (get-content $file | where-object {$_ -match "red"}) > { > write-host "`n" > write-host "$file" -ForegroundColor Yellow -Backgroundcolor Black > } > $lines = get-content $file > foreach ($line in $file) > { get-content $file | where-object {$_ -match "red"} > } > > } > > Andrew Watt MVP |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? Jonathan Eric Miller wrote: > PS C:\> get-command ping > > CommandType Name Definition > ----------- ---- ---------- > Application ping.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe ....tho the output is unnecessarily verbose and doesn't seem suitable for inclusion in a pipeline of commands. I guess a combination of grep \\ | awk "{print $3}" could alleviate that, but a -q flag would be better or better yet, quiet by default and have -v or -h for verbosity or human readable output. ~Jason -- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? Jason Gurtz wrote: > Jonathan Eric Miller wrote: >> PS C:\> get-command ping >> >> CommandType Name Definition >> ----------- ---- ---------- >> Application ping.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe > > ...tho the output is unnecessarily verbose and doesn't seem suitable for > inclusion in a pipeline of commands. > > I guess a combination of grep \\ | awk "{print $3}" could alleviate > that, but a -q flag would be better or better yet, quiet by default and > have -v or -h for verbosity or human readable output. > > ~Jason > You mean like this ? : (get-command ping).Definition or get-command ping | select definition get-command ping | ft definition Greetings /\/\o\/\/ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? /\/\o\/\/ wrote: > You mean like this ? : > > (get-command ping).Definition Oh, right on. The OO technique is even better! ![]() Cheers, ~Jason -- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? Yeah, I think that's supposed to be one of the major differences between PowerShell and UNIX shells, namely, it uses objects and not just text output. "/\/\o\/\/" <no@spam.mow> wrote in message news:O03JV9RoGHA.4340@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Jason Gurtz wrote: >> Jonathan Eric Miller wrote: >>> PS C:\> get-command ping >>> >>> CommandType Name Definition >>> ----------- ---- ---------- >>> Application ping.exe >>> C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe >> >> ...tho the output is unnecessarily verbose and doesn't seem suitable for >> inclusion in a pipeline of commands. >> >> I guess a combination of grep \\ | awk "{print $3}" could alleviate >> that, but a -q flag would be better or better yet, quiet by default and >> have -v or -h for verbosity or human readable output. >> >> ~Jason >> > > You mean like this ? : > > (get-command ping).Definition > > or > > get-command ping | select definition > get-command ping | ft definition > > > Greetings /\/\o\/\/ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? I seem to be coming in the tail end of this thread for some reason. Has select-string been discussed? This is our grep equivalent. If you want to search through a directory of files, then you can do select-string pattern *.txt To search through a file heirarchy do dir -rec -include *.txt | select-string pattern -bruce -- Bruce Payette [MSFT] Windows PowerShell Technical Lead Microsoft Corporation This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Jonathan Eric Miller" <jemiller@uchicago.edu> wrote in message news:%23Yrko9GoGHA.1592@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Thanks for the response Andrew. > > "Andrew Watt [MVP]" <SVGDeveloper@aol.com> wrote in message > news:lmjka2169ebv0h0tec4mfl7147iqo0pfb8@4ax.com... >> Jon, >> >> For grep equivalence take a look at get-content with a where-object in >> the second pipeline step. >> >> For example, you want to find lines in a file that match a regular >> expression pattern: >> >> get-content filename | >> where-object {$_ -match "regularExpressionPattern"} > > Would it be easy to search multiple files and print the names/paths of the > files that contain a match? > >> Adapt as necessary. >> >> For tail take a look at the -first and -last parameters on >> select-object. You would typically use it with a sort-object in the >> preceding pipeline step to order objects according to the criterion of >> interest. > > I don't know if this would work because what "tail -f" does is monitor the > file for changes. Everytime text is appended to the file, tail prints the > new text out. I was able to implement this using FileSystemWatcher in > .NET. > >> I am not too familiar with "which" but from your description something >> like > > Actually, I found that Get-Command seems to do exactly what UNIX which > does. Basically, all you have to do is the following. > > PS C:\> get-command ping > > CommandType Name Definition > ----------- ---- ---------- > Application ping.exe > C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe > >> get-childitem Script1.ps1 | >> format-list Name, PSParentPath >> >> should give you something similar to what you want. >> >> Andrew Watt MVP >> Author - Professional Windows PowerShell (Wrox) >> >> On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:37:01 -0700, Jon Miller <Jon >> Miller@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I'm just starting to play around with PowerShell. It seems pretty cool. >>>There are a few things that I'm wondering though. Namely, I'm wondering >>>if >>>there are equivalents for UNIX commands grep, which, and tail. With >>>regard to >>>grep, I'm wondering if there are plans for an updated version of >>>FINDSTR.EXE >>>that is possibly more robust. I've also found the UNIX which command very >>>valuable. It tells you where in your path an executable file is found. >>>And >>>also, tail with the -f flag is very valuable for viewing log files and >>>having >>>their output displayed as new output is written to them. I've created my >>>own >>>.NET implementations (in C#) of the later two commands, but, I was >>>thinking >>>it would be nice since there seems to be interest in finally getting a >>>decent >>>shell going for Windows that these other commands be bundled with the OS >>>and/or the shell. >>> >>>Jon > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? Bruce Payette [MSFT] wrote: > select-string pattern *.txt I'm kinda interested if anyone could comment on the merits/differences of using select-string's -path arg with globing vs. get-childitem > To search through a file heirarchy do > > dir -rec -include *.txt | select-string pattern Esp. -rec offers a lot of power. Glad to say goodbye to du | grep | awk combos! A nice addition for PSH v2 might be a "maxDepth" value to the -recurse. I get this idea from Dan Cross' walk program written for Plan9 [1] ~Jason -- [1] Description (w/ C code): <http://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/2002-October/020820.html> and Usage: <http://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/2002-October/020822.html> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: grep, which, and tail commands? Cool, thanks Bruce. I'll try it out. On an unrelated note, I think I may have found a bug in get-command (not sure where I would report this). If you do the following, you will get back files that aren't executable but are in the path. For example, the following command returns C:\WINDOWS\system32\setup.bmp among others. gcm set* Jon "Bruce Payette [MSFT]" <brucepay@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:%23DiMIRSoGHA.4340@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >I seem to be coming in the tail end of this thread for some reason. Has >select-string been discussed? This is our grep equivalent. If you want to >search through a directory of files, then you can do > > select-string pattern *.txt > > To search through a file heirarchy do > > dir -rec -include *.txt | select-string pattern > > -bruce > > -- > Bruce Payette [MSFT] > Windows PowerShell Technical Lead > Microsoft Corporation > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. > > > > "Jonathan Eric Miller" <jemiller@uchicago.edu> wrote in message > news:%23Yrko9GoGHA.1592@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Thanks for the response Andrew. >> >> "Andrew Watt [MVP]" <SVGDeveloper@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:lmjka2169ebv0h0tec4mfl7147iqo0pfb8@4ax.com... >>> Jon, >>> >>> For grep equivalence take a look at get-content with a where-object in >>> the second pipeline step. >>> >>> For example, you want to find lines in a file that match a regular >>> expression pattern: >>> >>> get-content filename | >>> where-object {$_ -match "regularExpressionPattern"} >> >> Would it be easy to search multiple files and print the names/paths of >> the files that contain a match? >> >>> Adapt as necessary. >>> >>> For tail take a look at the -first and -last parameters on >>> select-object. You would typically use it with a sort-object in the >>> preceding pipeline step to order objects according to the criterion of >>> interest. >> >> I don't know if this would work because what "tail -f" does is monitor >> the file for changes. Everytime text is appended to the file, tail prints >> the new text out. I was able to implement this using FileSystemWatcher in >> .NET. >> >>> I am not too familiar with "which" but from your description something >>> like >> >> Actually, I found that Get-Command seems to do exactly what UNIX which >> does. Basically, all you have to do is the following. >> >> PS C:\> get-command ping >> >> CommandType Name Definition >> ----------- ---- ---------- >> Application ping.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe >> >>> get-childitem Script1.ps1 | >>> format-list Name, PSParentPath >>> >>> should give you something similar to what you want. >>> >>> Andrew Watt MVP >>> Author - Professional Windows PowerShell (Wrox) >>> >>> On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:37:01 -0700, Jon Miller <Jon >>> Miller@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I'm just starting to play around with PowerShell. It seems pretty cool. >>>>There are a few things that I'm wondering though. Namely, I'm wondering >>>>if >>>>there are equivalents for UNIX commands grep, which, and tail. With >>>>regard to >>>>grep, I'm wondering if there are plans for an updated version of >>>>FINDSTR.EXE >>>>that is possibly more robust. I've also found the UNIX which command >>>>very >>>>valuable. It tells you where in your path an executable file is found. >>>>And >>>>also, tail with the -f flag is very valuable for viewing log files and >>>>having >>>>their output displayed as new output is written to them. I've created my >>>>own >>>>.NET implementations (in C#) of the later two commands, but, I was >>>>thinking >>>>it would be nice since there seems to be interest in finally getting a >>>>decent >>>>shell going for Windows that these other commands be bundled with the OS >>>>and/or the shell. >>>> >>>>Jon >> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Commad equal to Grep | PowerShell | |||
| Find and GREP | PowerShell | |||
| grep -r equiv | PowerShell | |||
| Grep | Vista file management | |||
| select-string to act like grep -v | PowerShell | |||