Windows Vista Forums

Shoud I move all shared folders to WSS 3.0?
  1. #1


    Jack Guest

    Shoud I move all shared folders to WSS 3.0?

    The client is pushing me on WSS but I am not really familiar with it.
    That's why I am here with some basic questions.

    The server is SBS 2003 R2 Std. It has a few company wide shared
    folders which are about 80GB for each.

    1. Should I move those folders into Doc Library? Or, is there a reason
    that I shouldn't?

    2. There are some shared folders that are only accessible to managers.
    Should I create a separate Site Collection for this?



    3. Should I install WSS 3.0 on a separate member server or do a side
    by side install?

    4. If I install WSS 3.0 on a separate server, do you think the
    "Windows Internal Database" can do most of jobs or I'd better go for
    standard SQL?

    Thanks in advance

    j~

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #2


    Cliff Galiher - MVP Guest

    Re: Shoud I move all shared folders to WSS 3.0?

    Pick up a good book on sharepoint services. Well worth the money. But to
    answer your questions and get you going:

    1) I would not just dump files into a document library. Usually by looking
    at the files, and adding metadata, you will get a better "feel" for the
    subsites you want. You can actually create a better organized system if you
    take it file by file. And with sharepoint and its more granular user
    control, you can delegate that task, so now *you* won't have to be
    responsible for moving all of those files. You can enlist help.

    2) Site collections are *usually* (but not always) for larger organizations
    which truly need separate application and memory pools in IIS. For simple
    permissions, a simple subsite will suffice.

    3) Separate server. SxS is very tricky to pull off, and when something does
    go wrong, it impacts too many non-WSS things (WSUS, reporting, etc.)

    4) Very company-dependent. I don't know at all enough about your
    organization to make that guess. My advice? Start with the internal
    database, and if you actually follow #1 above and start loading data
    *slowly* and you pay attention to your performance monitors, you'll know if
    you need to migrate to SQL Server. And that migration is fairly
    straightfoward and documented on technet.

    -Cliff


    "Jack" <dontaskwhoiam2001@newsgroup> wrote in message
    news:b090d269-879f-4605-8e71-d3eb40a27204@newsgroup

    > The client is pushing me on WSS but I am not really familiar with it.
    > That's why I am here with some basic questions.
    >
    > The server is SBS 2003 R2 Std. It has a few company wide shared
    > folders which are about 80GB for each.
    >
    > 1. Should I move those folders into Doc Library? Or, is there a reason
    > that I shouldn't?
    >
    > 2. There are some shared folders that are only accessible to managers.
    > Should I create a separate Site Collection for this?
    >
    > 3. Should I install WSS 3.0 on a separate member server or do a side
    > by side install?
    >
    > 4. If I install WSS 3.0 on a separate server, do you think the
    > "Windows Internal Database" can do most of jobs or I'd better go for
    > standard SQL?
    >
    > Thanks in advance
    >
    > j~

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Shoud I move all shared folders to WSS 3.0? problems?

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cannot rename folders or move folders jillwenburg Vista file management 0 20 May 2009
Renamed Folders Revert to Previous Names, Cannot Move Folders - FOLDERS ONLY Mush Man Vista file management 6 19 Sep 2008
Where is Works Calendar file stored & can I move it to a shared dr MargeB Live Folder Share 3 20 Jul 2008
Move Folders? Sardini Live Mail 6 27 May 2008
Won't Move folders 13owman Vista file management 0 07 Jan 2008