This issue has reoccurred again today on only one of the two Domain
Controllers for the fourth for fifth month, now.
dfsutil /PurgeMUPCache run again.
Did not see the reply before, so here is the output from ipconfig /all of
the two domain controllers. There are no user machines or other servers
exhibiting the 1058 or 1030 errors.
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : dc1
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : scdl.local
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : scdl.local
Ethernet adapter SCDL LAN:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : scdl.local
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : BASP Virtual Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-18-8B-7D-B5-B7
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.55
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.254.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.55
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.55
Secondary WINS Server . . . . . . : 10.34.10.56
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : dc2
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : scdl.local
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : scdl.local
Ethernet adapter SCDL LAN:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : scdl.local
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : BASP Virtual Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-18-8B-7D-B5-B4
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.56
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.254.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.56
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.34.10.55
Secondary WINS Server . . . . . . : 10.34.10.56
"Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:
> Hello Library,
>
> Please porivde an unedited ipconfig /all from the servers and if exist also
> from a problem client, so we can verify DNS settings.
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>
> > Windows 2003 servers, two domain controllers.
> >
> > Recently, encountered the Userenv errors 1058 and 1030 being logged on
> > one of the domain controllers every five minutes. Problem occurred in
> > August and was resolved, then occurred again in October. Event log
> > entries on the domain controller match those in KB 887303, with Access
> > denied as the reason in the 1058 error messages.
> >
> > Worked through the steps outlined in KB article 887303. Of course,
> > the last
> > step (step eight) was the one which resolved the problem again, as it
> > did in
> > August.
> > However, I do have a question pertaining to the permissions listed in
> > step 5
> > of the KB article, as the error I was getting was Access denied, which
> > would
> > indicate a permissions problem somewhere.
> > Step 5 refers to another KB article, 290647 with regards to the
> > required permissions needed on the Sysvol folder and subfolders. In
> > that article, for a Windows 2003 server, steps 1c-f describe clearing
> > the box to inherit permissions from parent for the
> > %SystemRoot%\Windows\Sysvol\Sysvol and
> > %SystemRoot%\Windows\Sysvol\Sysvol\<domain> folders. Since there is
> > no description of what permissions to assign, this would effectively
> > leave these two folders with no permissions at all.
> >
> > Is this correct?
> >
> > I did not follow these particular steps, but continued with the
> > remaining permissions assignments, as well as those remaining in the
> > 887303 article. Also of note, there were more permissions granted to
> > the %SystemRoot%\Windows\Sysvol\Sysvol\<domain>\Policies\<policy_name>
> > folders on my servers than outlined in the article, for groups like
> > Enterprise Domain Controllers and Domain Admins.
> >
> > I’m very curious as to whether or not the permissions (or lack of)
> > outlined in the article are correct, as well as if the extraneous
> > permissions could be safely removed. I’m making the assumption that
> > the extra permissions are holdovers from when the domain was upgraded
> > from Windows 2000 to 2003 several years ago.
> >
> > Rick
> > >
>
> .
>