Solved Do not use registry cleaners!

Hyphen

Member
This is just a heads-up for everyone out there not to make this mistake that I made. This does not apply for those programs with specific Vista x64 versions.Recently I purchased a brand new Gateway computer. This computer had lots of pre-installed crapware on it and I did not want that. One of the programs in particular gave a really troublesome uninstall, and it left things messy. Knowing that, and wanting a clean system, I installed and ran RegCure, which found an insane amount of registry errors. I "fixed" them.What basically happened was, just hours after hooking up a brand new computer, RegCure completely destroyed my computer. It could find no networks, Windows Explorer would hardly run, it wouldn't connect to virtual disk management, all system restore dates were unavailable. It ruined my computer and I had to send it in to Gateway repairs with the filler excuse that I was given a faulty hard drive for them to fix my situation.IF YOU USE VISTA x64, IT IS IN MY HIGHEST RECOMMENDATION NOT TO USE ANY TYPE OF REGISTRY CLEANER!
 

My Computer

This is just a heads-up for everyone out there not to make this mistake that I made. This does not apply for those programs with specific Vista x64 versions.Recently I purchased a brand new Gateway computer. This computer had lots of pre-installed crapware on it and I did not want that. One of the programs in particular gave a really troublesome uninstall, and it left things messy. Knowing that, and wanting a clean system, I installed and ran RegCure, which found an insane amount of registry errors. I "fixed" them.What basically happened was, just hours after hooking up a brand new computer, RegCure completely destroyed my computer. It could find no networks, Windows Explorer would hardly run, it wouldn't connect to virtual disk management, all system restore dates were unavailable. It ruined my computer and I had to send it in to Gateway repairs with the filler excuse that I was given a faulty hard drive for them to fix my situation.IF YOU USE VISTA x64, IT IS IN MY HIGHEST RECOMMENDATION NOT TO USE ANY TYPE OF REGISTRY CLEANER!
posted from:http://www.vistax64.com/software/86472-latest-ccleaner-version-released.html
Is it just me or is there an unusually high number of inexperienced users using this registry cleaner (and other ones like it), and ending up with corrupted Windows files?

The programs often do not discriminate between legitimate and unwanted items, and I think users are too trusting that the things they "clean" are unnecessary or superfluous. Perhaps a warning is warranted?


Actually using Registry Cleaners is not the problem.
Almost every registry cleaner is not able to distinguish between unwanted and legitimate entries, letting it "clean" without oversight is the real issue. If you know the function of the entries it wants to "clean" and clean them it works fine. If you do not know the function then you do not let it "clean" them- rule of thumb.
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    T7600G Core2Duo 2.66 Ghz
    Motherboard
    Intel 945PM + ICH7 Chipset
    Memory
    4GB DDR2 PC2-5300 667MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Mobility Radeon x1900 256MB
    Sound Card
    Realtek HD
    Monitor(s) Displays
    WUXGA 17"
    Screen Resolution
    1920X1200
    Hard Drives
    640GB 7200RPM SATA/RAID 0 (2x320GB)
    and 320GB 7200RPM External
    Mouse
    Wireless Microsoft 3000
    Internet Speed
    10 mbps/2 mbps
    Other Info
    Optical Drive:
    Panasonic UJ-220 DL BD-RE (Blu-Ray)
It is my opinion that reg cleaners are usually worthless, and often dangerous. I just backed my reg and it's 350mb! Cutting a few data lines, or even thousands, is similar to snipping one word from the Sunday edition of the NY Times.

I have yet to see diagnostic, verifiable evidence that they speed up a computer to any degree worthy of the potential downside.

My opinon, of course.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Asus G50Vt plus two XP shop machines used for trouble-shooting client problems
What about ccleaner and auslogics registry defrag?
Are they bad too?
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Compaq
    CPU
    intel core 2 duo T 5550 @ 1.83 MHz
    Motherboard
    intel 965 chipset family
    Memory
    2 GB DDR 2 SD RAM @ 667 MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    On board upto 358 MB RAM
    Sound Card
    Onboard
    Monitor(s) Displays
    15"
    Hard Drives
    160 GB WDC
It is my opinion that reg cleaners are usually worthless, and often dangerous. I just backed my reg and it's 350mb! Cutting a few data lines, or even thousands, is similar to snipping one word from the Sunday edition of the NY Times.

I have yet to see diagnostic, verifiable evidence that they speed up a computer to any degree worthy of the potential downside.

My opinon, of course.
I dont advocate registry cleaners as I think most users who do use them do so with impunity without really understanding what they are doing, and as a result "clean" or delete critical Windows .dll entries (amongst other things), and end up with a corrupted Windows Installation, and/or program(s).
Honestly, I do not use them myself as there are other ways to improve performance, and If a situation arises where I need to edit the registry I do it through regedit. Easy, and simple.

ps- the best way to obtain a "clean system" on a new purchase is to reformat/re-install Vista and install the necessary programs that you want yourself. Then use a free imaging program to backup the entire drive for quick recovery if ever needed, and always use Vista's file backup utility to back up all your data on a weekly basis.
 
Last edited:

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    T7600G Core2Duo 2.66 Ghz
    Motherboard
    Intel 945PM + ICH7 Chipset
    Memory
    4GB DDR2 PC2-5300 667MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Mobility Radeon x1900 256MB
    Sound Card
    Realtek HD
    Monitor(s) Displays
    WUXGA 17"
    Screen Resolution
    1920X1200
    Hard Drives
    640GB 7200RPM SATA/RAID 0 (2x320GB)
    and 320GB 7200RPM External
    Mouse
    Wireless Microsoft 3000
    Internet Speed
    10 mbps/2 mbps
    Other Info
    Optical Drive:
    Panasonic UJ-220 DL BD-RE (Blu-Ray)
These programs are for people who want to have their computers in a more perfect state. I use them, but only for stuff I understand. If I see a registry entry I don't understand, I just skip it. Newer computers are not going to see improved performance (from what i've read) These programs (CCleaner) are not for everyone. They have their place. I have used CCleaner on my XP pro and never had a problem. I'm very careful with my Vista x64.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    The Terminator
    CPU
    Core 2 Quad
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
    Memory
    4X2GB GSkill 1066Mhz
    Graphics Card(s)
    GeForce 9500 GT
    Sound Card
    Realtek
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung SyncMaster 932 bw 19" and Syncmaster 2033 20"
    Screen Resolution
    1440 X 900 and 1600 X 900
    Hard Drives
    Patriot Torqx 128GB SSD
    WD Black 640GB
    PSU
    Corsair 750HX
    Case
    Lian Li PC-B70
    Cooling
    Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 7
    Keyboard
    An old e-machines PS-2 (I have HUGE fingers and it works)
    Mouse
    Microsoft wireless laser mouse 5000
    Internet Speed
    7 Mps
Is it just me or is there an unusually high number of inexperienced users using this registry cleaner (and other ones like it), and ending up with corrupted Windows files?

The programs often do not discriminate between legitimate and unwanted items, and I think users are too trusting that the things they "clean" are unnecessary or superfluous. Perhaps a warning is warranted?

The other problem is users who advocate their use as a "fix all" without explanation or understanding. I've read quite a few post where it was recommended to "use a reg cleaner to get rid of "crapware" or use a reg cleaner to “remove anything ATI/Nvidia" - problem...some of those files are base files, or some of that "crapware" is essential to the proper operation of the OS/system.

Yeah, "your" custom built system may not have that "Dell" bloated "crapware" on your system...but on a "Dell" built system, that "crapware" could turn out to be a critical file!!!

No one explains this as they freely advocate the use of "reg cleaners"

That's the problem.

Though I've tried reg cleaners in the past, I don't use them now, nor do I advocate them. I personally think they do more harm than good.

However, If you still desire to use a reg cleaner then I would follow rive0108's advice...

Actually using Registry Cleaners is not the problem.
Almost every registry cleaner is not able to distinguish between unwanted and legitimate entries, letting it "clean" without oversight is the real issue. If you know the function of the entries it wants to "clean" and clean them it works fine. If you do not know the function then you do not let it "clean" them- rule of thumb.

Just my two cents

Great post rive :)
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
    Motherboard
    Intel D975XBX2
    Memory
    Corsair TWIN2X4096-PC8500 (2x2GHz)
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI Radeon HD 4890 (1GHz)
    Sound Card
    X-Fi Titanium - Fatality Pro Series
    Monitor(s) Displays
    hp w2207h (22" widescreen)
    Screen Resolution
    1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    One 750GB, 2x500GB Western Digital Caviar Black Hard Drives (32meg)
    PSU
    Antec Neo HE 550
    Case
    Antec P182
    Cooling
    Zalman CNPS9500 AT
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Revolution
    Internet Speed
    "High" Speed DSL? Is that like low speed FIOS?
    Other Info
    Q6600 B3 Revision OC to 3.0GHz
Why thank you sygnus.:D
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    T7600G Core2Duo 2.66 Ghz
    Motherboard
    Intel 945PM + ICH7 Chipset
    Memory
    4GB DDR2 PC2-5300 667MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Mobility Radeon x1900 256MB
    Sound Card
    Realtek HD
    Monitor(s) Displays
    WUXGA 17"
    Screen Resolution
    1920X1200
    Hard Drives
    640GB 7200RPM SATA/RAID 0 (2x320GB)
    and 320GB 7200RPM External
    Mouse
    Wireless Microsoft 3000
    Internet Speed
    10 mbps/2 mbps
    Other Info
    Optical Drive:
    Panasonic UJ-220 DL BD-RE (Blu-Ray)
Thanks. I thougt it was a good post.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
    Motherboard
    Intel D975XBX2
    Memory
    Corsair TWIN2X4096-PC8500 (2x2GHz)
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI Radeon HD 4890 (1GHz)
    Sound Card
    X-Fi Titanium - Fatality Pro Series
    Monitor(s) Displays
    hp w2207h (22" widescreen)
    Screen Resolution
    1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    One 750GB, 2x500GB Western Digital Caviar Black Hard Drives (32meg)
    PSU
    Antec Neo HE 550
    Case
    Antec P182
    Cooling
    Zalman CNPS9500 AT
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Revolution
    Internet Speed
    "High" Speed DSL? Is that like low speed FIOS?
    Other Info
    Q6600 B3 Revision OC to 3.0GHz
I have told others who insist on using reg cleaners to first make a full copy of the registry. Not an image or ghost, but a real exported copy. Create a folder called _00 or something beginning with the underscore that places at the top of the Explore list.

Create a desktop shortcut to a handy place on the screen.

Now use the reg cleaner with EXTREME caution, and not the scorched earth method to fix all.

If all goes well, wonderful. After a safe period, say a few weeks, delete the reg file if you need the space.

But if things go south and the cleaner mess things up, you can boot up, even in safemode, double click that shortcut and import the full file back to the reg.

Reboot, and you are back to original with little effort or risk.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Asus G50Vt plus two XP shop machines used for trouble-shooting client problems
I have told others who insist on using reg cleaners to first make a full copy of the registry. Not an image or ghost, but a real exported copy. Create a folder called _00 or something beginning with the underscore that places at the top of the Explore list.

Create a desktop shortcut to a handy place on the screen.

Now use the reg cleaner with EXTREME caution, and not the scorched earth method to fix all.

If all goes well, wonderful. After a safe period, say a few weeks, delete the reg file if you need the space.

But if things go south and the cleaner mess things up, you can boot up, even in safemode, double click that shortcut and import the full file back to the reg.

Reboot, and you are back to original with little effort or risk.
or you could create a system restore point...
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    T7600G Core2Duo 2.66 Ghz
    Motherboard
    Intel 945PM + ICH7 Chipset
    Memory
    4GB DDR2 PC2-5300 667MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Mobility Radeon x1900 256MB
    Sound Card
    Realtek HD
    Monitor(s) Displays
    WUXGA 17"
    Screen Resolution
    1920X1200
    Hard Drives
    640GB 7200RPM SATA/RAID 0 (2x320GB)
    and 320GB 7200RPM External
    Mouse
    Wireless Microsoft 3000
    Internet Speed
    10 mbps/2 mbps
    Other Info
    Optical Drive:
    Panasonic UJ-220 DL BD-RE (Blu-Ray)
or you could create a system restore point...

That might work just fine, and probably would, but I'm not certain I would trust RP's because they some times fail to work. I've seen too many posts [not necessarily here] from users who could not get the RP to restore.

More: my preference for having a full copy of the reg is the same reason I prefer full copies of drives, and not images or ghosts. Those techniques are wonderful, but IMHO, outdated today. When drives were outrageously expensive, such methods were wonderful. But with 1TB drives running for less than $100, to me it makes no sense to risk losing months of work with imaging.

There is nothing quite like full and complete copies

My personal opinion, of course.
 
Last edited:

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Asus G50Vt plus two XP shop machines used for trouble-shooting client problems
or you could create a system restore point...

That might work just fine, and probably would, but I'm not certain I would trust RP's because they some times fail to work. I've seen too many posts [not necessarily here] from users who could not get the RP to restore.

More: my preference for having a full copy of the reg is the same reason I prefer full copies of drives, and not images or ghosts. Those techniques are wonderful, but IMHO, outdated today. When drives were outrageously expensive, such methods were wonderful. But with 1TB drives running for less than $100, to me it makes no sense to risk losing months of work with imaging.

There is nothing quite like full and complete copies

My personal opinion, of course.
When you say "full and complete copies" are you refering to file/folder data backup, mirroring, or a complete copy, (aka, image of hdd and partitions)?

Not an image. A fully functional copy, a duplicate of everything, including the OS files. I use apps with Shadow Copy, so they "stop" the OS file for a micro second, copy it, then release it. You normally cannot copy a live OS file, but shadow copies work.

By copying to a second drive, I can boot to either hard drive and they are identical. [it's my backup]
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Asus G50Vt plus two XP shop machines used for trouble-shooting client problems
Thats called a "Mirror image" and is commonly refered to as RAID 1 when there are two HDD involved. The only differenence is RAID 1 is a "perfect" mirroring, while your appears to be a software snapshot mirror image.

I don't know if it's an image or not. Perhaps so.

But the two drives are identical in size and function. I can disconnect either drive and the remaining one works boots and works perfectly.

I did not know imaged drives could boot by themselves.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Asus G50Vt plus two XP shop machines used for trouble-shooting client problems
I didn't paste the quotes, but that is good info, rive0108, thanks.

I have three USB ext drives: one has a full copy of the original Vista installation. Two has a copy of C and D drives that I update monthly. And three has a C and D copy that I update about weekly or so.

But I never make an update without virus scanning first, also a disk cleanup, and I check the DM for errors.

I am really not so paranoid as to have three such ext disks, but Circuit City went into foreclosure and I could not pass up those discounted prices. It was a two for one price, and I already had a duplicate HD to match the laptop 2.5" drive.

Since i have them, might as well use 'em.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Asus G50Vt plus two XP shop machines used for trouble-shooting client problems
Back
Top