![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper Well Jabusamra, maybe i did explain badly: Perfect disk (not Diskeeper) continues to say that system files need a defragmentation "over and over again". So when i do say to go ahead with it, the computer shuts down, defrags the system files and restarts. But when i analyse again, it says to defrag again the system files ? SO? In Perfect disk you can defrag every 2 days. Do not know for Diskeeper yet. I only started it manually. It should start tomorrow morning at 7PM. So i will know tomorrow. Bye François |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper Jabu, we can continue forever here. I was only talking of Perfect disk what it does and not does. Or keep saying what should be done, when it is done. I never said anything about Diskeeper and system files. François |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper Well Perfect Disk ran this morning when i changed my black color cartridge of the HP 3500. As said in previous posts PD does not start when system is on password. Since i run Raid5 with Scsi drives, running PD while using the pc does not slow down, at least not noticable. Now PD says nothing about system files. So i ran Diskeeper right after, then analyze with P.Disk. So here is the difference between Raxco and Diskeeper: P.D. says "Perfect Disk recommends performing a "SMARTPlacement" defragmentation pass based on free space fragmentation. So i find this interesting. Right now my preference goes to Perfect Disk for this reason. Anyone in favor of Diskeeper, please let us know. Bye François |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper i said that AUSLOGICS does NOT defrag a partition, only the full drive. My bad, it dos defrag ONE partition. Sorry for that, François |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| XP Pro/SP3, Vista HP | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper Diskeeper 11 vs Perfect Disk 8 - DriverHeaven.net The above thread might be helpful. Anyway, I like the diskeeper automatic functionality which beats manual scheduling by far, so DK still has my vote. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Windows Vista | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper Diskeeper will always be defragging again, immediately - it never stops, whether files are deleted/modified or not. You should also check out free space consolidation and near-full disk environments. DK does not defragment all metadata and has limited free space consolidation, IMO. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper Hi Benjamin & Jabu, i like also the automatic defrag of DK and for that i would easily turn to DK, but Perfect Disk says to you when the system files need to be defraged (at boot time) and DK does this not. Since i only shut down my computer once in a while (can well be not in a month), it is nice to be informed that your system files need a defrag. So Dk defrags auto, but says nothing on the system files subject. PF defrags whenever you want, like every day or every 2 days, but informs you how your system files are. My trial version of PD is over in 3 days, so i will still have time to test DK further for another 3 weeks, then i wil hopefully make the right decision. Bye François |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| XP Pro/SP3, Vista HP | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper I think you can email DK or PD customer support for your specific questions before you buy. Better to confirm that your requirements are met before you spend your money! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper Hi Jabu, how do you explain that PF says frequently that system files need a run and that DK does not do this? Never (while obviously necessary) did DK indicate this. So? Jabu you are always talking about the system files....why is this? thanks, François |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| | Re: Perfect disk versus Diskeeper just found on the net: Ultimate Defrag: UltimateDefrag - Powerful Defrag Software And Hard Drive Optimizer - Description and sent them a mail to ask if this works with Vista x64. Costs only $19.95 so way cheaper than PD or DK Anyone using this? thanks François |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista Defrag versus Diskeeper | Vista General | |||
| Perfect Disk 8 and built in defragger to Vista 32 bit | Vista General | |||
| Critical update for Perfect Disk 8 | Vista General | |||
| Ghosting Vista disk not perfect.... | Vista General | |||
| Critical update for Perfect Disk 8 | Vista performance & maintenance | |||