|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
 |
| |
07-29-2008
| #1 (permalink) |
| | xcacl performance What kind of performance degredation should I expect by running xcacls to add read access for one file that already has a few hundred acls set for other users? |
My System Specs |
|
07-29-2008
| #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: xcacl performance "Dave" <dmattie@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:58df9836-889f-43f0-8c95-e7e5c4957d25@xxxxxx Quote: > What kind of performance degredation should I expect by running xcacls > to add read access for one file that already has a few hundred acls > set for other users? of users. I also wonder how your question relates to scripting. |
| My System Specs |
|
07-30-2008
| #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: xcacl performance On Jul 29, 4:45*pm, "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I....@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > "Dave" <dmat...@xxxxxx> wrote in message > > news:58df9836-889f-43f0-8c95-e7e5c4957d25@xxxxxx > Quote: > > What kind of performance degredation should I expect by running xcacls > > to add read access for one file that already has a few hundred acls > > set for other users? > You might be better off creating a group for these hundreds > of users. I also wonder how your question relates to scripting. groups aren't an option - I'd end up in a worse situation, with one group for every file (they're all unrelated), thousands of files. |
| My System Specs |
|
07-30-2008
| #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: xcacl performance "Dave" <dmattie@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:488cc8f6-ff60-4ded-a717-8153775d6c2a@xxxxxx On Jul 29, 4:45 pm, "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I....@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > "Dave" <dmat...@xxxxxx> wrote in message > > news:58df9836-889f-43f0-8c95-e7e5c4957d25@xxxxxx > Quote: > > What kind of performance degredation should I expect by running xcacls > > to add read access for one file that already has a few hundred acls > > set for other users? > You might be better off creating a group for these hundreds > of users. I also wonder how your question relates to scripting. groups aren't an option - I'd end up in a worse situation, with one group for every file (they're all unrelated), thousands of files. ============ Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought your question related to the machine's performance during file access. It now appears that you're asking how running xcacls.vbs affects the machine. If this is of concern then I would run the command after hours. Since this is a one-off event, there shouldn't be any problem. |
| My System Specs |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Performance | Software | |||
| performance | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| performance monitor: low performance on windows aero | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Performance and UAC | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| performance | Vista General | |||
