![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | msdn scripting information Hi, I use msdn.microsoft.com as my starting point for searching for scripting info from Microsoft. I use IE6. Recently it seems that the styling of this web site is wasting a significant portion of my screen space. I'm using a 12 by 9-inch screen in 1024 by 768 resolution. I'm using IE6 on WXP with various service packson various computers. The main web page at msdn.microsoft.com wastes an inch at the top with widely spaced item, but the search box is prominent, so it works for me. The search results wastes about two inches, but at least it can be scrolled up to get to useful info in the result list. My main problem is with the pages linked to in the search results. Very recently, pages like http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...32(VS.85).aspx, pull up their skirts, so to speak. The page loads, filling the window, but then the left and right panes/frames pull up their bottom edge about two inches above the bottom of the window and raise them more if I make the status bar visible. This leaves a strip about two inches wide at the bottom of the IE window which is always blank. No matter how the IE window height is increased or decreased, that two-inch of blank space is maintained. The vertical scroll bar does not extend down into the two-inch blank space. I'm wondering if this is a problem for all IE versions or only older IE versions. Does anyone else see this problem? If it is a css or other style problem, does anyone have a URL with info or sample scripts for overriding this styling for uselessness that seems to be an increasing phenomenon. Does anyone have a URL for bringing stuff like this to the attention of Microsoft? I suppose it could be a problem caused by disgruntled employees at Microsoft. If so, I hope they get regruntled soon. -Paul Randall |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information Paul Randall wrote: Quote: > Recently it seems that the styling of this web site is wasting > a significant portion of my screen space. > assuming that I am using a 24in LCD display, just because they have one. There are even cases (where I wanted to refer to a page ofter) where I have had to download the page and manually adjust the css to make the page more readable. cheers, jw |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information Paul Randall wrote: Quote: > I use msdn.microsoft.com as my starting point for searching for scripting > info from Microsoft. I use IE6. Recently it seems that the styling of this > web site is wasting a significant portion of my screen space. their website to your liking (doubtful), then you can fix-it-yourself. You can retrieve the page (either with xmlHTTP's methods, or just an ordinary "NavigateTo"), and then take out the header (or anything else) by writing a script (in the onLoad event) to use css or dhtml to either hide the offending elements, or to simply delete them. cheers, jw ____________________________________________________________ You got questions? WE GOT ANSWERS!!! ..(but, no guarantee the answers will be applicable to the questions) |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information You don't get the vertical scroll bar if you use FireFox. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information "mr_unreliable" <kindlyReplyToNewsgroup@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:Om30BkxpJHA.4448@xxxxxx Quote: > Paul Randall wrote: Quote: >> I use msdn.microsoft.com as my starting point for searching for scripting >> info from Microsoft. I use IE6. Recently it seems that the styling of >> this web site is wasting a significant portion of my screen space. > Paul, assuming ms is not willing to "snap-to" and fix > their website to your liking (doubtful), then you can > fix-it-yourself. > > You can retrieve the page (either with xmlHTTP's methods, > or just an ordinary "NavigateTo"), and then take out the > header (or anything else) by writing a script (in the > onLoad event) to use css or dhtml to either hide the > offending elements, or to simply delete them. > > cheers, jw header style that bother me, but was only partially successful. But they changed their style, I think. With respect to the two inches of white space at the bottom on pages like http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...32(VS.85).aspx, I thought my style changed might have been a cause since I'm a CSS neophyte. It turns out that on a newly installed WXP, I see the same effect in its IE6. Do you see this effect on your systems? If it looks like this will be a long term thing, then maybe I will load the web page in a VBScripted instance of IE and dynamically delete IE tags that cause these silly effects. Thanks for your input, -Paul Randall |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information Paul Randall wrote: Quote: > With respect to the two inches of white space > at the bottom on pages like > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...32(VS.85).aspx, > (On my system) in IE6, I get the white-space at the bottom. However, Firefox renders that page perfectly (at least afaict). I never thought I'd see the day when firefox did a better job of showing a MICROSOFT page than IE (an ms product) does. cheers, jw |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information <gimme_this_gimme_that@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:533b2132-c8d6-4de0-97eb-af343a2e8e7d@xxxxxx Quote: > You don't get the vertical scroll bar if you use FireFox. decided to try it on that newly reinstalled WXP system. On IE6, when the two-inch whitespace appears at the bottom, the header is scrolled up under the IE window's header/menu/ button bar area. I didn't know it was there. On this laptop, no part of the MSDN header appears. On my test WXP system, about 1/4 inch of the MSDN header appears when the scroll bar's thumb is at the top. That 1/4 inch just barely allows me to click the 'printer friendly version' button, which is also a 'Paul' friendly version. On my laptop, I can't get to that printer friendly version button :-( Maybe I can load this stuff in an instance of IE started with a VBScript, and have the script click the printer friendly button for me. In Firefox, the page is displayed as it should be, with a vertical scroll bar that can scroll any part of the page into view. Maybe upgrading my laptop to SP3 would make it give me the 1/4 inch of the header like the test WXP system does. -Paul Randall |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information If you are making the best out of a machine that's over 4 years old - I recommend staying with SP2. SP3 will make your machine much safer against browsers - but it *will* slow it down - and if you're machine is slower than 1.2Ghz - you'll which you hadn't upgraded. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information "mr_unreliable" <kindlyReplyToNewsgroup@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OkkLg70pJHA.6096@xxxxxx Quote: > Paul Randall wrote: Quote: >> With respect to the two inches of white space at the bottom on pages like >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...32(VS.85).aspx, > Ugh. That page is weird. > > (On my system) in IE6, I get the white-space at the bottom. > > However, Firefox renders that page perfectly (at least afaict). > I never thought I'd see the day when firefox did a better job > of showing a MICROSOFT page than IE (an ms product) does. Its not just that page -- there are probably thousands that render in that particular stupid manner. That is why I complained in a Microsoft-hosted scripting group whose users might actually use a Microsoft browser to get Microsoft info on Microsoft's tools that are frequently access by scripting. If only there were a place to point out to Microsoft how stupid this is. -Paul Randall |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: msdn scripting information <gimme_this_gimme_that@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:5e67847f-7614-4a26-9a6d-dc7a36eb60a6@xxxxxx Quote: > If you are making the best out of a machine that's over 4 years old - > I recommend staying with SP2. > > SP3 will make your machine much safer against browsers - but it *will* > slow it down - and if you're machine is slower than 1.2Ghz - you'll > which you hadn't upgraded. -Paul Randall |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| VB scripting for machine Startup and GPO information | VB Script | |||
| Scripting - pull out information from System Properties->General_> | PowerShell | |||
| VB scripting help | VB Script | |||
| Extracting information from MSDN | PowerShell | |||
| Scripting bug? | PowerShell | |||