Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Misc Newsgroups > Virtual PC

Vista - Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze

Reply
 
Old 09-08-2008   #1 (permalink)
David Sanders


 
 

Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze

dryii wrote:
Quote:

> I'm attempting to create a new virtual machine in Virtual PC 2007
> (6.0.156.0) for Fedora 9. I downloaded the DVD ISO last night. I
> created a new VM with 1GB of memory and 16GB disk. I can boot the VM
> and have successfully booted off the ISO image.
>
> The problem? No matter what options I put for booting (text vs GUI
> doesn't matter, either) the load stops around the following area:
> system 00:0c: iomem range 0x0-0x0 could not be reserved
>
> It doesn't stop on that line every time, but near/around that part of
> the boot process. When it hits the freeze, I have to reset the VM.
> CTRL-ALT-DEL doesn't work. I'm not getting the "unrecoverable
> processor error", but I did try adding the 'noreplace-paravirt'. It
> didn't help.
>
> Any suggestions on what I might try to get this loaded?
(1) Have you checked the sha1sum of the file you downloaded? Sounds
like a corrupt iso.
(2) Are you using Fedora-9-i386-DVD.iso or Fedora-9-i386-netinst.iso ?
(3) Whichever you are using, try the other one.
(4) It works here, but only with the noreplace-paravirt boot parameter.
You will need the same.
Good luck. David

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-09-2008   #2 (permalink)
Bob Babcock


 
 

Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze

dryii wrote:
Quote:

> I'm attempting to create a new virtual machine in Virtual PC 2007
> (6.0.156.0) for Fedora 9. I downloaded the DVD ISO last night. I
> created a new VM with 1GB of memory and 16GB disk. I can boot the VM
> and have successfully booted off the ISO image.
>
> The problem? No matter what options I put for booting (text vs GUI
> doesn't matter, either) the load stops around the following area:
> system 00:0c: iomem range 0x0-0x0 could not be reserved
What type of CPU do you have? I ran into the same problems with an Athlon
64 X2 5600+ (dual-core), but it seems to be working on an Athlon XP-A 2800+
(single-core). (Packages are being installed as I type this.) I did use
the noreplace-paravirt boot parameter. Assuming the install finishes, I'll
copy the VM to my dual-core machine and see if it works there.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-09-2008   #3 (permalink)
Bob Babcock


 
 

Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze

Having built a Fedora 9 VM on a single-core AMD system, I find that I can
run it on my dual-core system without needing to provide any special boot
parameters. I have no idea why I can't do the install with dual-core, or
if that is even what causes the failure.

It's not quite right; video is messed up most places where the VM should be
in text mode.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-10-2008   #4 (permalink)
David Sanders


 
 

Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze

Bob Babcock wrote:
Quote:

> dryii wrote:
Quote:

>> I'm attempting to create a new virtual machine in Virtual PC 2007
>> (6.0.156.0) for Fedora 9. I downloaded the DVD ISO last night. I
>> created a new VM with 1GB of memory and 16GB disk. I can boot the VM
>> and have successfully booted off the ISO image.
>>
>> The problem? No matter what options I put for booting (text vs GUI
>> doesn't matter, either) the load stops around the following area:
>> system 00:0c: iomem range 0x0-0x0 could not be reserved
>
> What type of CPU do you have? I ran into the same problems with an Athlon
> 64 X2 5600+ (dual-core), but it seems to be working on an Athlon XP-A 2800+
> (single-core). (Packages are being installed as I type this.) I did use
> the noreplace-paravirt boot parameter. Assuming the install finishes, I'll
> copy the VM to my dual-core machine and see if it works there.
I have a Pentium D. For an AMD processor I don't think you need
noreplace-paravirt, but I'm not sure.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-10-2008   #5 (permalink)
Bob Babcock


 
 

Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze

David Sanders <news@xxxxxx> wrote in
news:OUToYy2EJHA.1268@xxxxxx:
Quote:

> I have a Pentium D. For an AMD processor I don't think you need
> noreplace-paravirt, but I'm not sure.
Perhaps not. I just tried booting the Fedora 9 install DVD on my single-
core AMD system and it works with default parameters. Noreplace-paravirt
may change exactly where the dual-core system hangs the installer, but it
certainly doesn't make it work.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 09-10-2008   #6 (permalink)
Bob Babcock


 
 

Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze

Bob Babcock <wssddc@xxxxxx> wrote in
news:Xns9B15E2F64593Awssddcgisnet@xxxxxx:
Quote:

> David Sanders <news@xxxxxx> wrote in
> news:OUToYy2EJHA.1268@xxxxxx:
>
Quote:

>> I have a Pentium D. For an AMD processor I don't think you need
>> noreplace-paravirt, but I'm not sure.
>
> Perhaps not. I just tried booting the Fedora 9 install DVD on my
> single- core AMD system and it works with default parameters.
> Noreplace-paravirt may change exactly where the dual-core system hangs
> the installer, but it certainly doesn't make it work.
I made a list of valid boot parameters that I found in a Google search and
tried various combinations. I find that either
ide0=noprobe
or clock=pit
(or both) allow the installer to start. I cannot explain why these
seemingly very different parameters both work, nor can I explain why only
the installer needs them. I did not do an install, but I did take it
several screens into the GUI.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 10-19-2008   #7 (permalink)
Silver1882


 
 

Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze


Thanks for the Ideal to get this to install
"Bob Babcock" wrote:
Quote:

> Bob Babcock <wssddc@xxxxxx> wrote in
> news:Xns9B15E2F64593Awssddcgisnet@xxxxxx:
>
Quote:

> > David Sanders <news@xxxxxx> wrote in
> > news:OUToYy2EJHA.1268@xxxxxx:
> >
Quote:

> >> I have a Pentium D. For an AMD processor I don't think you need
> >> noreplace-paravirt, but I'm not sure.
> >
> > Perhaps not. I just tried booting the Fedora 9 install DVD on my
> > single- core AMD system and it works with default parameters.
> > Noreplace-paravirt may change exactly where the dual-core system hangs
> > the installer, but it certainly doesn't make it work.
>
> I made a list of valid boot parameters that I found in a Google search and
> tried various combinations. I find that either
> ide0=noprobe
> or clock=pit
> (or both) allow the installer to start. I cannot explain why these
> seemingly very different parameters both work, nor can I explain why only
> the installer needs them. I did not do an install, but I did take it
> several screens into the GUI.
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
RE: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze Virtual PC
Re: Fedora 9: install attempts freeze Virtual PC
Error 1935 during install attempts of C&C3 Tiberium Wars Vista Games
Vista64 Install Freeze Vista installation & setup
My attempts to install Vista installation & setup


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46