![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Disk performance comparing different options? Anyone done any benchmarks (or know and why) when running VPC with different options for VHD files? - Fixed disk size (fastest I guess) - Dynamically expanding disks - Differencing disks - Using undo disks Other things interesting would be performance using differencing disks when parent file and differencing disk files are on different physical disks. Or having undo disk and vhd on different physical drives.But I guess this is hard to test because the data you get from disk might be in one file only. Also will there be any noticable performance loss if the VHD file is compressed (the .vhd file on the host pc). |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Performance options disapeared | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Options for disk defragmenter | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Performance Options without Administrator Rights | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Advanced Performance Options | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Theme changed when applying Performance Options | Vista General | |||