Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Misc Newsgroups > Virtual PC

Vista - Virtual PC

Reply
 
Old 02-12-2009   #1 (permalink)
RayZef


 
 

Virtual PC

If VM does not see the USB ports, it makes the software unusable. Everything
these days is USB! Why, is it difficult to access the ports from the XP
guest?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #2 (permalink)
Bo Berglund


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:34:01 -0800, RayZef
<RayZef@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>If VM does not see the USB ports, it makes the software unusable. Everything
>these days is USB! Why, is it difficult to access the ports from the XP
>guest?
Microsoft has in its wisdom decided against it. Not even in the ir
latest virtualization systems do they support this...
You have to use other products like VMWare instead.
--

Bo Berglund (Sweden)
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #3 (permalink)
VanguardLH


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

Bo Berglund wrote:
Quote:

> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:34:01 -0800, RayZef
> <RayZef@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
Quote:

>>If VM does not see the USB ports, it makes the software unusable. Everything
>>these days is USB! Why, is it difficult to access the ports from the XP
>>guest?
>
> Microsoft has in its wisdom decided against it. Not even in the ir
> latest virtualization systems do they support this...
> You have to use other products like VMWare instead.
USB is not supported even in their Hyper-V product:

http://www.microsoft.com/servers/hyp...r/default.mspx

It's free but I haven't gotten around to playing with it yet. Don't
have another host with better hardware to test it. From only a couple
articles, it appears not even Hyper-V supports USB devices although it
does demand hardware-assisted virtualization support in the CPU.

Maybe it's a problem of just which VM gets to control the USB device
since you can obviously have more than one VM running concurrently.
Yet VMWare Server (also free) supports USB devices. So the USB
limitation is an arbitrary restriction in the Microsoft products.

Rayzef never bothered to mention WHAT type of USB device he was asking
about. For USB drives, the guest sees them as simply a mass storage
device. It doesn't know they are USB connected. From other posts, VPC
supports pass-through of storage devices, just like it does for the
mouse and keyboard. However, as I recall, the USB drive must already be
attached and ready in the host OS before you start the guest OS. The
USB drive must be ready in the host OS before the virtual drive in the
VM tries to access it.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #4 (permalink)
Mark Rae [MVP]


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

"VanguardLH" <V@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gn3p0r$pre$1@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Maybe it's a problem of just which VM gets to control the USB device
> since you can obviously have more than one VM running concurrently.
According to Microsoft, it's simply that other features have been considered
more important...

Quote:

> Yet VMWare Server (also free) supports USB devices.
As does VMWare Player (also free), and VMWare Workstation and VWMare Fusion
(for Mac), though the last two aren't free... So does VirtualBox.

Quote:

> So the USB limitation is an arbitrary restriction in the Microsoft
> products.
Not all of them. Microsoft Virtual PC for Mac supports USB devices, though
I'm not sure if this is still a supported product. Doesn't run on Macs with
Intel processors either...


--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #5 (permalink)
Steve Jain [MVP]


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:43:05 -0000, "Mark Rae [MVP]"
<mark@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>"VanguardLH" <V@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:gn3p0r$pre$1@xxxxxx
>
Quote:

>> Maybe it's a problem of just which VM gets to control the USB device
>> since you can obviously have more than one VM running concurrently.
>
>According to Microsoft, it's simply that other features have been considered
>more important...
>
>
Quote:

>> Yet VMWare Server (also free) supports USB devices.
>
>As does VMWare Player (also free), and VMWare Workstation and VWMare Fusion
>(for Mac), though the last two aren't free... So does VirtualBox.
>
And VMWare's most expensive VM offering, ESX, does not support USB.

--
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #6 (permalink)
ronald.phillips


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

On Feb 13, 12:56*pm, "Steve Jain [MVP]" <norepl...@-.essjae.com>
wrote:
Quote:

> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:43:05 -0000, "Mark Rae [MVP]"
>
>
>
> <m...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

> >"VanguardLH" <V...@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> >news:gn3p0r$pre$1@xxxxxx
>
Quote:
Quote:

> >> Maybe it's a problem of just which VM gets to control the USB device
> >> since you can obviously have more than one VM running concurrently.
>
Quote:

> >According to Microsoft, it's simply that other features have been considered
> >more important...
>
Quote:
Quote:

> >> Yet VMWare Server (also free) supports USB devices.
>
Quote:

> >As does VMWare Player (also free), and VMWare Workstation and VWMare Fusion
> >(for Mac), though the last two aren't free... So does VirtualBox.
>
> And VMWare's most expensive VM offering, ESX, does not support USB.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVPhttp://vpc.essjae.com/

Vmotion/DRS are more important to Vmware in this product than USB
support for a server.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #7 (permalink)
Steve Jain [MVP]


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:18:16 -0800 (PST), ronald.phillips@xxxxxx
wrote:
Quote:

>On Feb 13, 12:56*pm, "Steve Jain [MVP]" <norepl...@-.essjae.com>
>wrote:
Quote:

>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:43:05 -0000, "Mark Rae [MVP]"
>>
>>
>>
>> <m...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>> >"VanguardLH" <V...@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >news:gn3p0r$pre$1@xxxxxx
>>
Quote:

>> >> Maybe it's a problem of just which VM gets to control the USB device
>> >> since you can obviously have more than one VM running concurrently.
>>
Quote:

>> >According to Microsoft, it's simply that other features have been considered
>> >more important...
>>
Quote:

>> >> Yet VMWare Server (also free) supports USB devices.
>>
Quote:

>> >As does VMWare Player (also free), and VMWare Workstation and VWMare Fusion
>> >(for Mac), though the last two aren't free... So does VirtualBox.
>>
>> And VMWare's most expensive VM offering, ESX, does not support USB.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVPhttp://vpc.essjae.com/
>
>
>Vmotion/DRS are more important to Vmware in this product than USB
>support for a server.
Yes, just like Live Migration is more important than USB in Hyper-V.

--
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #8 (permalink)
Steve Jain [MVP]


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:33:05 -0600, VanguardLH <V@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>ronald.phillips@xxxxxx wrote:
>
Quote:

>> Steve Jain wrote:
Quote:

>>>
>>> Mark Rae wrote:
>>>>
>>>> VanguardLH wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet VMWare Server (also free) supports USB devices.
>>>>
>>>> As does VMWare Player (also free), and VMWare Workstation and
>>>> VWMare Fusion (for Mac), though the last two aren't free... So does
>>>> VirtualBox.
>>>
>>> And VMWare's most expensive VM offering, ESX, does not support USB.
>>
>> Vmotion/DRS are more important to Vmware in this product than USB
>> support for a server.
>
>I also believe it has to do with the target market for a product. ESX
>is not sold to end users. It is used for virtualized servers where
>users don't have access to the console (display, keyboard, mouse) and
>where "external" drives use NAS, not USB, and printers are networked,
>not connected via USB cables. After all, why does a web server, file
>server, or SQL server need USB support? Users shouldn't be using those
>hosts, virtualized or real.
Yes, which are the same reasons that Hyper-V, "MS latest and
greatest," doesn't either. That's the point I was making.

--
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #9 (permalink)
Van Chocstraw


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

RayZef wrote:
Quote:

> If VM does not see the USB ports, it makes the software unusable. Everything
> these days is USB! Why, is it difficult to access the ports from the XP
> guest?
MS Virtual PC has too many issues. I have to use VMWare Player.



--
<<//--------------------\\>>
Van Chocstraw
Quote:
Quote:

>>\\--------------------//<<
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-13-2009   #10 (permalink)
RayZef


 
 

Re: Virtual PC

Sincere thanks for all the replies, I was hopeing to use a USB scanner, which
works ubder XP but not Vista. I will have a read of the other VM's available
and see if I can use one on my desktop.
Thanks again
Ray Z





"Steve Jain [MVP]" wrote:
Quote:

> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:33:05 -0600, VanguardLH <V@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
Quote:

> >ronald.phillips@xxxxxx wrote:
> >
Quote:

> >> Steve Jain wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Mark Rae wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> VanguardLH wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yet VMWare Server (also free) supports USB devices.
> >>>>
> >>>> As does VMWare Player (also free), and VMWare Workstation and
> >>>> VWMare Fusion (for Mac), though the last two aren't free... So does
> >>>> VirtualBox.
> >>>
> >>> And VMWare's most expensive VM offering, ESX, does not support USB.
> >>
> >> Vmotion/DRS are more important to Vmware in this product than USB
> >> support for a server.
> >
> >I also believe it has to do with the target market for a product. ESX
> >is not sold to end users. It is used for virtualized servers where
> >users don't have access to the console (display, keyboard, mouse) and
> >where "external" drives use NAS, not USB, and printers are networked,
> >not connected via USB cables. After all, why does a web server, file
> >server, or SQL server need USB support? Users shouldn't be using those
> >hosts, virtualized or real.
>
> Yes, which are the same reasons that Hyper-V, "MS latest and
> greatest," doesn't either. That's the point I was making.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
> http://vpc.essjae.com/
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
error: Virtual PC could not open the Virtual Machine Network Servicesdriver Virtual PC
Unable to install Virtual Guest Services on virtual machine Virtual Server
RE: Virtual PC could not open the Virtual Machine Network Services driver Virtual PC
Vista Home Premium .. Can't install Virtual Server.. so how do Iautomatically start a Virtual PC without a login? Virtual PC
How To: Windows Performance Monitor Virtual Switch Port instance IDto Virtual NIC or VM Virtual Server


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46