![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | VPC vs. Sun VirtualBox: which is better and why? Feel free to pontificate. ![]() |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: VPC vs. Sun VirtualBox: which is better and why? walterius's previous post was like this : Quote: > > Feel free to pontificate. ![]() I use both. VPC may have better support for Win OSs. E.g. installing W2KPro in VPC was much easier for me. VBox has USB support. ( closed source version only , said due licencing matters ) Vbox has better support for non Windows OS, and is multiplatform. VPC support only 32bit guests. Vbox supposrt 64bit guests, if CPU has HW virtualization support ( e.g. C2D E6xxx ). It can even support 64bit guest on 32bit host. -- Poutnik The best choice is such a choice, that causes the least number of people to complain it is NOT the best choice. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: VPC vs. Sun VirtualBox: which is better and why? "walterius" <invalid@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:6t1El.27506$v8.12848@xxxxxx Quote: > Feel free to pontificate. ![]() If you want to know which virtualisation software is better, the answer is easy - it's the one which best fits your business needs... -- Mark Rae ASP.NET MVP http://www.markrae.net |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Can I install VPC and VirtualBox on the same XP PC ? | Virtual PC | |||
| opening virtualbox vmc | Virtual PC | |||
| Sun Microsystems Releases xVM VirtualBox 2.0 | Vista News | |||
| VirtualBox 1.6.4 | Utilities | .NET General | |||
| VirtualBox, anyone? | Virtual PC | |||