![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | DMZ/Inernal LAN Setup Hi All, I'm trying to determine if I can securely setup a single Host server (Virtual Server or Hyper-V) hosting two VMs in the following way: 1. One VM is connected to Public DMZ 2. One VM is connected to internal network. 3. Each VM will have dedicated physical network connection. 4. Cisco Firewall rules will allow communication between DMZ and Internal server. 5. Maximize security. How do you protect internal network if DMZ VM is compromised? 6. Host server does not need to communicate with either VM, but VM administration is still required from the host. Would a 3 nic host server be required? How would I cofingure each network connection? Thanks! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: DMZ/Inernal LAN Setup "bitter32" <bitter32@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:3C1296B1-BAB9-4110-A01A-F655255B25BA@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to determine if I can securely setup a single Host server > (Virtual Server or Hyper-V) hosting two VMs in the following way: > > 1. One VM is connected to Public DMZ > 2. One VM is connected to internal network. > 3. Each VM will have dedicated physical network connection. > 4. Cisco Firewall rules will allow communication between DMZ and Internal > server. > 5. Maximize security. How do you protect internal network if DMZ VM is > compromised? > 6. Host server does not need to communicate with either VM, but VM > administration is still required from the host. > > Would a 3 nic host server be required? > How would I cofingure each network connection? > > Thanks! you want to administer the host remotely. If you are using a Cisco you must have a physical DMZ and private LAN. In Hyper-V you would connect one NIC in the host to the DMZ, create a virtual switch linked to this NIC and connect one vm to the network. You would connect another NIC in the host to the internal network, create a virtual switch and connect the other vm to that network. The situation with Virtual Server would be similar but you do not need to create the virtual switches. Virtual Server will automatically set up a virtual network for each NIC in the host. If your firewall is compromised, there is nothing you can do about it by changing things on this server. Whether the server is a physical or virtual machine makes no difference to the way networking operates. If a network is compromised, all machines on that network are compromised. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Setup has now become Vista General II(Miscellaneous) instead of Setup | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Setup can not run vista RC1 setup on XP pro? | Vista General | |||
| Vista Beta 2 hangs during setup installation setup | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Windows Setup: setup.exe - Application Error | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Windows Setup: setup.exe - Application Error | Vista installation & setup | |||