![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | iSCSI and switch high availibility Hi Could you advice me if this configuration will work? I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different switch. I’m going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports) connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of failure (NICs and Switches). I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of similar configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times more expensive. I don’t want to spend money for something which is not useful. Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about this configuration? Is any better solution? And just in case (I know we can’t use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar like for iSCSI network? Best Regards |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility Teaming is probably not a good idea around Hyper-V at this point. Last I heard here, it was creating issues. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:03587C5D-C800-4CBF-B522-7A9EECCFDE17@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > Could you advice me if this configuration will work? > I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on > each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two > switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different > switch. I’m going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports) > connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of > failure (NICs and Switches). > I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of > similar > configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times > more expensive. I don’t want to spend money for something which is not > useful. > Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about > this > configuration? Is any better solution? > And just in case (I know we can’t use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone > found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar > like > for iSCSI network? > Best Regards > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility Many thanks for your reply. I noticed that teaming cause some problems with Hyper-V (I wasn’t able to find another solution to provide high availability for Hyper-V network – any ideas? I wonder especially about switch). However I’m going to use teaming for iSCSI network. Do you think it will cause problems as well? "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: Quote: > Teaming is probably not a good idea around Hyper-V at this point. Last I > heard here, it was creating issues. > > -- > Charlie. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > > "Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:03587C5D-C800-4CBF-B522-7A9EECCFDE17@xxxxxx Quote: > > Hi > > Could you advice me if this configuration will work? > > I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on > > each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two > > switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different > > switch. I’m going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports) > > connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of > > failure (NICs and Switches). > > I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of > > similar > > configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times > > more expensive. I don’t want to spend money for something which is not > > useful. > > Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about > > this > > configuration? Is any better solution? > > And just in case (I know we can’t use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone > > found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar > > like > > for iSCSI network? > > Best Regards > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility Teaming for iSCSI is not supported Multiple NIC's and having MPIO in combination with the iSCSI initiator using multiple paths is supported see iSCSI product documentation for information. rgds, Edwin. "Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:03587C5D-C800-4CBF-B522-7A9EECCFDE17@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > Could you advice me if this configuration will work? > I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on > each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two > switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different > switch. I'm going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports) > connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of > failure (NICs and Switches). > I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of Quote: > configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times > more expensive. I don't want to spend money for something which is not > useful. > Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about Quote: > configuration? Is any better solution? > And just in case (I know we can't use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone > found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar Quote: > for iSCSI network? > Best Regards > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility Many thanks for your reply So MPIO will provide iSCSI network redundancy. Heart Beat network is also not support in NIC teaming. But in this case I can use two NIC in different subnets. But what about Hyper-V? How I can provide fail over for guests? Any idea? Best Regards |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility Hi Piotr, My understanding is that you should use Clustering for HA in resources. Perhaps this link could help you http://blogs.msdn.com/clustering/arc...1/8628515.aspx Regards! Antonio Soto "Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:21BAAA42-3247-4C8E-99F5-6A56FD2C4CCA@xxxxxx Quote: > Many thanks for your reply > > So MPIO will provide iSCSI network redundancy. Heart Beat network is also > not support in NIC teaming. But in this case I can use two NIC in > different > subnets. > But what about Hyper-V? How I can provide fail over for guests? Any idea? > > Best Regards > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | RE: iSCSI and switch high availibility Many thanks for yours help. Now I just knnow there is no way to provide authomatic failover for Hyper-V guests NICs. It is not good news for me but I have clarity. Thanks again and have a good weekend. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Iscsi | PowerShell | |||
| ISCSI SAN / fiber san | Virtual Server | |||
| ISCSI or Fibre? | Virtual Server | |||
| Can you help with this iSCSI error? | Vista General | |||
| iSCSI - How do I log off/back on | Vista networking & sharing | |||