Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Misc Newsgroups > Virtual Server

Vista - iSCSI and switch high availibility

Reply
 
Old 08-28-2008   #1 (permalink)
Piotr


 
 

iSCSI and switch high availibility

Hi
Could you advice me if this configuration will work?
I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on
each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two
switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different
switch. I’m going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports)
connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of
failure (NICs and Switches).
I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of similar
configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times
more expensive. I don’t want to spend money for something which is not
useful.
Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about this
configuration? Is any better solution?
And just in case (I know we can’t use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone
found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar like
for iSCSI network?
Best Regards


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-28-2008   #2 (permalink)
Charlie Russel - MVP


 
 

Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility

Teaming is probably not a good idea around Hyper-V at this point. Last I
heard here, it was creating issues.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel

"Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:03587C5D-C800-4CBF-B522-7A9EECCFDE17@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hi
> Could you advice me if this configuration will work?
> I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on
> each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two
> switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different
> switch. I’m going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports)
> connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of
> failure (NICs and Switches).
> I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of
> similar
> configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times
> more expensive. I don’t want to spend money for something which is not
> useful.
> Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about
> this
> configuration? Is any better solution?
> And just in case (I know we can’t use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone
> found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar
> like
> for iSCSI network?
> Best Regards
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-28-2008   #3 (permalink)
Piotr


 
 

Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility

Many thanks for your reply.

I noticed that teaming cause some problems with Hyper-V (I wasn’t able to
find another solution to provide high availability for Hyper-V network – any
ideas? I wonder especially about switch).
However I’m going to use teaming for iSCSI network. Do you think it will
cause problems as well?


"Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
Quote:

> Teaming is probably not a good idea around Hyper-V at this point. Last I
> heard here, it was creating issues.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
> "Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:03587C5D-C800-4CBF-B522-7A9EECCFDE17@xxxxxx
Quote:

> > Hi
> > Could you advice me if this configuration will work?
> > I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on
> > each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two
> > switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different
> > switch. I’m going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports)
> > connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of
> > failure (NICs and Switches).
> > I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of
> > similar
> > configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times
> > more expensive. I don’t want to spend money for something which is not
> > useful.
> > Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about
> > this
> > configuration? Is any better solution?
> > And just in case (I know we can’t use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone
> > found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar
> > like
> > for iSCSI network?
> > Best Regards
> >
>
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-28-2008   #4 (permalink)
Edwin vMierlo [MVP]


 
 

Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility

Teaming for iSCSI is not supported

Multiple NIC's and having MPIO in combination with the iSCSI initiator using
multiple paths is supported
see iSCSI product documentation for information.



rgds,
Edwin.



"Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:03587C5D-C800-4CBF-B522-7A9EECCFDE17@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hi
> Could you advice me if this configuration will work?
> I want to use 4xDL380 G5 (as Hyper-V hosts and clustering) with 2xNIC on
> each (working in team) for iSCSI network. Servers are connected to two
> switches DELL PowerConnect 2724. Every NIC from team plugged to different
> switch. I'm going to use DELL MD3000i with two controllers (4 ports)
> connected to the some switches. Everything to eliminate single point of
> failure (NICs and Switches).
> I wonder if these switches will work correctly. I found examples of
similar
Quote:

> configuration on DELL webpage but with PowerConnect 5000 which is 10 times
> more expensive. I don't want to spend money for something which is not
> useful.
> Could you tell me if it will work? Maybe some additional advices about
this
Quote:

> configuration? Is any better solution?
> And just in case (I know we can't use teaming for Hyper-V) maybe someone
> found solution for high availability for public Hyper-V network similar
like
Quote:

> for iSCSI network?
> Best Regards
>

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-28-2008   #5 (permalink)
Piotr


 
 

Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility

Many thanks for your reply

So MPIO will provide iSCSI network redundancy. Heart Beat network is also
not support in NIC teaming. But in this case I can use two NIC in different
subnets.
But what about Hyper-V? How I can provide fail over for guests? Any idea?

Best Regards

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-28-2008   #6 (permalink)
Antonio Soto


 
 

Re: iSCSI and switch high availibility

Hi Piotr,

My understanding is that you should use Clustering for HA in resources.
Perhaps this link could help you
http://blogs.msdn.com/clustering/arc...1/8628515.aspx

Regards!
Antonio Soto

"Piotr" <Piotr@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:21BAAA42-3247-4C8E-99F5-6A56FD2C4CCA@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Many thanks for your reply
>
> So MPIO will provide iSCSI network redundancy. Heart Beat network is also
> not support in NIC teaming. But in this case I can use two NIC in
> different
> subnets.
> But what about Hyper-V? How I can provide fail over for guests? Any idea?
>
> Best Regards
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 08-29-2008   #7 (permalink)
Piotr


 
 

RE: iSCSI and switch high availibility

Many thanks for yours help. Now I just knnow there is no way to provide
authomatic failover for Hyper-V guests NICs. It is not good news for me but I
have clarity.
Thanks again and have a good weekend.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Iscsi PowerShell
ISCSI SAN / fiber san Virtual Server
ISCSI or Fibre? Virtual Server
Can you help with this iSCSI error? Vista General
iSCSI - How do I log off/back on Vista networking & sharing


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46