|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
 |
| |
09-22-2008
| #1 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V comparing Obviously, you're asking for this information in a Microsoft-focused forum, so you're going to get the Microsoft story here. :-) The synthetic device support and micro-kernelized Hypervisor are significant advantages, in my opinion. Comparing current feature sets, there is no compelling reason to go VMWare on a single server implementation, as you mention below. Go with Hyper-V... There should be plenty of marketing material on both company's sites, so no need to expound on it here. Hope this helps, --Ryan -- Ryan Sokolowski MVP - Clustering MCT, MCITP x3, MCTS x7, MCSE x2, CCNA, CCDA, BCFP "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:CB4396E6-06E2-42CE-B8FE-8B2962D61C96@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi, > > I am planning to virtualize several windows servers on one physical > server. > > I am not ready to decide, if I choose Hyper-V or VMware ESXi 3.5 > > Does anybody know already both solutions and can tell me, if Hyper-V has > more vantages than the VMware solution on one physical machine? > And is there a difference in performance? > > Thanks for your feedback. > > Patrick |
My System Specs |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hyper-V vs Full Win2008 Hyper-V | Virtual Server | |||
| Hyper-V standalone vs Hyper-V windows 2008 Core | Virtual Server | |||
| Cannot manage an Hyper-V on Core from a full installed W2K8 with Hyper-V... | Virtual Server | |||
| Comparing two lists | PowerShell | |||
| Comparing strings - is it a bug? | PowerShell | |||
