![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Server 2008 Hyper-V network problems I have the parent server connected to the public network without issue. its a 2008 database server running Hyper-V. but all the child servers i make are unable to communicate wiht anyone outside of the server or on the 192.168.1.* unroutable subnet. so anything on the main public subnet is dead to them. despite the child servers themselves haivng an ip and subnet mask on that subnet. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Server 2008 Hyper-V network problems How have you configured the virtual networking? Are the vms on a virtual network which is linked to the physical NIC in the host? It sounds like they are in a virtual network which links to the host but not to the physical network. Machines on a private network must have a NAT router to enable them to access the Internet. If the vms are in a virtual network which is not linked to the physical NIC, you will need to route the traffic through the host to access the Internet. You could run RRAS as a NAT router in the host. I prefer to have my vms isolated from the host (and route through a vm). This is not possible in your case if they are using the database on the host. "NeonDemon" <neondemon@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0fcd3b4a-ff95-4021-bb2a-f0520275be21@xxxxxx Quote: > I have the parent server connected to the public network without > issue. its a 2008 database server running Hyper-V. but all the child > servers i make are unable to communicate wiht anyone outside of the > server or on the 192.168.1.* unroutable subnet. so anything on the > main public subnet is dead to them. despite the child servers > themselves haivng an ip and subnet mask on that subnet. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Server 2008 Hyper-V network problems Hyper-V has three kinds of virtual networks: Internal, Private and External. The Private network is ONLY available to VMs on that box. The Internal network can connect to other VMs on the box, and to the parent itself. But without something acting as a router, can not connect past the parent (host). Only the External network type allows the VM to connect through the physical NIC to the outside world. It doesn't matter what IP address or subnet you choose for Internal or Private virtual networks, if you connect your VM to these network types, they won't be able to see the outside world without something acting as a router. (So, for example, you could have an internal Private network, which doesn't allow the VMs to see anything except other VMs attached to that Private network, but if one of them has a second NIC, attached to an External network, and is running RRAS or other NAT/router, then you would be able to connect to an outside connection through that VM. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "NeonDemon" <neondemon@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:0fcd3b4a-ff95-4021-bb2a-f0520275be21@xxxxxx Quote: >I have the parent server connected to the public network without > issue. its a 2008 database server running Hyper-V. but all the child > servers i make are unable to communicate wiht anyone outside of the > server or on the 192.168.1.* unroutable subnet. so anything on the > main public subnet is dead to them. despite the child servers > themselves haivng an ip and subnet mask on that subnet. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Server 2008 Hyper-V network problems The VMS are linked to the physical nic. in that i selected the nic, and that nic was turned into a virtuial switch and another connection made automatically which i selected to be connected to the virtual nic in the child. On Sep 29, 8:31*pm, "Bill Grant" <not.available@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > * * How have you configured the virtual networking? Are the vms on a virtual > network which is linked to the physical NIC in the host? It sounds like they > are in a virtual network which links to the host but not to the physical > network. > > * *Machines on a private network must have a NAT router to enable them to > access the Internet. > > * * If the vms are in a virtual network which is not linked to the physical > NIC, you will need to route the traffic through the host to access the > Internet. You could run RRAS as a NAT router in the host. > > * *I prefer to have my vms isolated from the host (and route through a vm). > This is not possible in your case if they are using the database on the > host. > > "NeonDemon" <neonde...@xxxxxx> wrote in message > > news:0fcd3b4a-ff95-4021-bb2a-f0520275be21@xxxxxx > Quote: > > I have the parent server connected to the public network without > > issue. its a 2008 database server running Hyper-V. but all the child > > servers i make are unable to communicate wiht anyone outside of the > > server or on the 192.168.1.* unroutable subnet. so anything on the > > main public subnet is dead to them. despite the child servers > > themselves haivng an ip and subnet mask on that subnet. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Server 2008 Hyper-V network problems Just got done rebuilding the server. the VMS are connected to the External NIC. (Intel(R) PRO/1000 ......... Adapter #2 - Virtual Network) which was made after selecting the Intel pro/1000... in the virtuial network manager from the dropdown under "External:" with that connected to the virtuial machine and given a unique IP adress but other wise the same info as on the host. i only have access to the host and other VMS on the host. which is confusing because i did not select private, i selected External. but its behaving like its private... any ideas? On Sep 30, 9:53*am, NeonDemon <neonde...@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > The VMS are linked to the physical nic. in that i selected the nic, > and that nic was turned into a virtuial switch and another connection > made automatically which i selected to be connected to the virtual nic > in the child. > > On Sep 29, 8:31*pm, "Bill Grant" <not.available@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quote: > > * * How have you configured the virtual networking? Are the vms on a virtual > > network which is linked to the physical NIC in the host? It sounds likethey > > are in a virtual network which links to the host but not to the physical > > network. Quote: > > * *Machines on a private network must have a NAT router to enable them to > > access the Internet. Quote: > > * * If the vms are in a virtual network which is not linked to the physical > > NIC, you will need to route the traffic through the host to access the > > Internet. You could run RRAS as a NAT router in the host. Quote: > > * *I prefer to have my vms isolated from the host (and route through a vm). > > This is not possible in your case if they are using the database on the > > host. Quote: > > "NeonDemon" <neonde...@xxxxxx> wrote in message Quote: > >news:0fcd3b4a-ff95-4021-bb2a-f0520275be21@xxxxxx Quote: Quote: > > > I have the parent server connected to the public network without > > > issue. its a 2008 database server running Hyper-V. but all the child > > > servers i make are unable to communicate wiht anyone outside of the > > > server or on the 192.168.1.* unroutable subnet. so anything on the > > > main public subnet is dead to them. despite the child servers > > > themselves haivng an ip and subnet mask on that subnet. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Server 2008 Hyper-V network problems It could be a problem with the device driver for the physical NIC. Some of them don't play well with the virtual switch software. It could also be a problem with your physical switch. Some switch ports will only allow one MAC address per port. This prevents any virtual machines using the same switch port as the host, since each vm has its own MAC address for its NIC. "NeonDemon" <neondemon@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:50b43804-14dc-4e18-8786-8ce167f830cb@xxxxxx Quote: > Just got done rebuilding the server. the VMS are connected to the > External NIC. (Intel(R) PRO/1000 ......... Adapter #2 - Virtual > Network) which was made after selecting the Intel pro/1000... in the > virtuial network manager from the dropdown under "External:" with that > connected to the virtuial machine and given a unique IP adress but > other wise the same info as on the host. i only have access to the > host and other VMS on the host. which is confusing because i did not > select private, i selected External. but its behaving like its > private... any ideas? > > > > On Sep 30, 9:53 am, NeonDemon <neonde...@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >> The VMS are linked to the physical nic. in that i selected the nic, >> and that nic was turned into a virtuial switch and another connection >> made automatically which i selected to be connected to the virtual nic >> in the child. >> >> On Sep 29, 8:31 pm, "Bill Grant" <not.available@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Quote: >> > How have you configured the virtual networking? Are the vms on a >> > virtual >> > network which is linked to the physical NIC in the host? It sounds like >> > they >> > are in a virtual network which links to the host but not to the >> > physical >> > network. Quote: >> > Machines on a private network must have a NAT router to enable them to >> > access the Internet. Quote: >> > If the vms are in a virtual network which is not linked to the physical >> > NIC, you will need to route the traffic through the host to access the >> > Internet. You could run RRAS as a NAT router in the host. Quote: >> > I prefer to have my vms isolated from the host (and route through a >> > vm). >> > This is not possible in your case if they are using the database on the >> > host. Quote: >> > "NeonDemon" <neonde...@xxxxxx> wrote in message Quote: >> >news:0fcd3b4a-ff95-4021-bb2a-f0520275be21@xxxxxx Quote: >> > > I have the parent server connected to the public network without >> > > issue. its a 2008 database server running Hyper-V. but all the child >> > > servers i make are unable to communicate wiht anyone outside of the >> > > server or on the 192.168.1.* unroutable subnet. so anything on the >> > > main public subnet is dead to them. despite the child servers >> > > themselves haivng an ip and subnet mask on that subnet. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hyper-V Server 2008 RPC is not running | Virtual Server | |||
| MS Hyper-V Server install as VM on Windows 2008 Ent error - "No active network adapters found" | Virtual Server | |||
| How do I set up SCVMM 2008 to interface with Hyper-V Server 2008? | Virtual Server | |||
| Hyper-V Server 2008 | Virtual Server | |||
| Re: Few Server 2008 / Hyper-V questions. | Virtual Server | |||