![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Disk controler with hyper-v Hello after setting up my first w2K3r2sp2 vm on hyper-v, i was surprised to see that i was unable to choose an scsi disk. Only IDE controler is available and seen is hyper-v despite the fact that my server his a dell R200 with 2 SAS 3Gb/s hard drives 15 Ktmins on a perc6/iR controller any idea ? In advance Thks fafa |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Disk controler with hyper-v This is "normal" in Hyper-V. The IDE and SCSI designations for disks have _nothing_ to do with the underlying physical hardware. They are simply the way that Hyper-V presents the synthetic disk controller to the child operating systems. Because the synthetic SCSI would require a driver to be loaded before the disk could be seen by the OS, the boot disk must always be "IDE". In order to use the synthetic SCSI disks, the integration components must be loaded. But the IDE type is available to all OSs without additional drivers, so use that for your boot disk. An important note: unlike Virtual Server, the effective speed of the IDE and SCSI disk types are the same, so there's no penalty for choosing IDE. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "fafa" <fadhelbb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23ANcvFGXJHA.4384@xxxxxx Quote: > Hello > > after setting up my first w2K3r2sp2 vm on hyper-v, i was surprised to see > that i was unable to choose an scsi disk. Only IDE controler is available > and seen is hyper-v despite the fact that my server his a dell R200 with 2 > SAS 3Gb/s hard drives 15 Ktmins on a perc6/iR controller > > any idea ? > > In advance Thks > fafa |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Disk controler with hyper-v so it's not intersting to load a scsi driver to have better performance thks fafa Charlie Russel - MVP a écrit : Quote: > This is "normal" in Hyper-V. The IDE and SCSI designations for disks > have _nothing_ to do with the underlying physical hardware. They are > simply the way that Hyper-V presents the synthetic disk controller to > the child operating systems. Because the synthetic SCSI would require a > driver to be loaded before the disk could be seen by the OS, the boot > disk must always be "IDE". In order to use the synthetic SCSI disks, the > integration components must be loaded. But the IDE type is available to > all OSs without additional drivers, so use that for your boot disk. > > An important note: unlike Virtual Server, the effective speed of the IDE > and SCSI disk types are the same, so there's no penalty for choosing IDE. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Disk controler with hyper-v Nope. Performance is the same on both controllers according to the Hyper-V team. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "fafa" <fadhelbb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OSU0ugHXJHA.868@xxxxxx Quote: > so it's not intersting to load a scsi driver to have better performance > > thks > fafa > Charlie Russel - MVP a écrit : Quote: >> This is "normal" in Hyper-V. The IDE and SCSI designations for disks have >> _nothing_ to do with the underlying physical hardware. They are simply >> the way that Hyper-V presents the synthetic disk controller to the child >> operating systems. Because the synthetic SCSI would require a driver to >> be loaded before the disk could be seen by the OS, the boot disk must >> always be "IDE". In order to use the synthetic SCSI disks, the >> integration components must be loaded. But the IDE type is available to >> all OSs without additional drivers, so use that for your boot disk. >> >> An important note: unlike Virtual Server, the effective speed of the IDE >> and SCSI disk types are the same, so there's no penalty for choosing IDE. >> |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hyper-V and Disk types | Virtual Server | |||
| Hyper-V standalone vs Hyper-V windows 2008 Core | Virtual Server | |||
| dynamic disk always in offline state when VM restarts in Hyper-v | Virtual Server | |||
| Cannot manage an Hyper-V on Core from a full installed W2K8 with Hyper-V... | Virtual Server | |||
| Drivers for EIDE controler | Vista hardware & devices | |||