Windows Vista Forums

Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in BI
  1. #1


    JohnD Guest

    Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in BI

    Hello,

    I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    hyperthreading)
    - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express chipset

    As best I can tell, all of these components support hardware-assisted
    virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.

    I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed the
    Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    following are set to ENABLED:
    - Virtualization Technology
    - No-Execute Memory Protect
    (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)

    In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V running.

    However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in the log:
    - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in the
    system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform supported by
    Hyper-V.
    - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in
    BIOS


    I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from everything
    I've read)
    - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest versions)
    - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea what)

    I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale has to be
    set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I originally
    installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my locale
    (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to all the
    reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V (twice, for
    good measure). The problem remains.

    If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really appreciate it. I
    had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't want to use
    it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the OS.



    Thanks in advance!

    John

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #2


    Charlie Russel - MVP Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in BI

    Well, you've got newer hardware than I do. But I'd strongly suspect that you
    should be turning OFF hyper-threading. I'd certainly give that a try, at
    least.

    --
    Charlie.
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel

    "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    news:4C148E52-2700-49D2-A903-96C2CC9EED6D@xxxxxx

    > Hello,
    >
    > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    > hyperthreading)
    > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express chipset
    >
    > As best I can tell, all of these components support hardware-assisted
    > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    >
    > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed the
    > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    > following are set to ENABLED:
    > - Virtualization Technology
    > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    >
    > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V running.
    >
    > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in the
    > log:
    > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in the
    > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform supported by
    > Hyper-V.
    > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled
    > in
    > BIOS
    >
    >
    > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    > everything
    > I've read)
    > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest
    > versions)
    > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea what)
    >
    > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale has to
    > be
    > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I originally
    > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my
    > locale
    > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to all
    > the
    > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V (twice, for
    > good measure). The problem remains.
    >
    > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really appreciate it.
    > I
    > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't want to
    > use
    > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the OS.
    >
    > Thanks in advance!
    >
    > John

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #3


    JohnD Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled i

    Hi Charlie

    Thanks for your reply. Actually that's one thing I neglected to mention - I
    did try turning off hyper-threading, and it made no difference.

    Thanks

    John

    "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:

    > Well, you've got newer hardware than I do. But I'd strongly suspect that you
    > should be turning OFF hyper-threading. I'd certainly give that a try, at
    > least.
    >
    > --
    > Charlie.
    > http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >
    > "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    > news:4C148E52-2700-49D2-A903-96C2CC9EED6D@xxxxxx

    > > Hello,
    > >
    > > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    > > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    > > hyperthreading)
    > > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express chipset
    > >
    > > As best I can tell, all of these components support hardware-assisted
    > > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    > >
    > > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed the
    > > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    > > following are set to ENABLED:
    > > - Virtualization Technology
    > > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    > > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    > >
    > > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V running.
    > >
    > > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in the
    > > log:
    > > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in the
    > > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform supported by
    > > Hyper-V.
    > > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled
    > > in
    > > BIOS
    > >
    > >
    > > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    > > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    > > everything
    > > I've read)
    > > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest
    > > versions)
    > > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea what)
    > >
    > > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale has to
    > > be
    > > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I originally
    > > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my
    > > locale
    > > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to all
    > > the
    > > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V (twice, for
    > > good measure). The problem remains.
    > >
    > > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really appreciate it.
    > > I
    > > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't want to
    > > use
    > > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the OS.
    > >
    > > Thanks in advance!
    > >
    > > John
    >
    >

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #4


    Charlie Russel - MVP Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled i

    Then I'd check with the mobo mfg and see if there's a BIOS update. I can't
    see a reason why it shouldn't enable. (You _have_ done a full power off
    reboot since making the BIOS changes, correct?)

    --
    Charlie.
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel

    "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    news:B5A39881-6B92-4453-9C8C-6A1769377BA7@xxxxxx

    > Hi Charlie
    >
    > Thanks for your reply. Actually that's one thing I neglected to mention -
    > I
    > did try turning off hyper-threading, and it made no difference.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > John
    >
    > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    >

    >> Well, you've got newer hardware than I do. But I'd strongly suspect that
    >> you
    >> should be turning OFF hyper-threading. I'd certainly give that a try, at
    >> least.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Charlie.
    >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >>
    >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    >> news:4C148E52-2700-49D2-A903-96C2CC9EED6D@xxxxxx

    >> > Hello,
    >> >
    >> > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    >> > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    >> > hyperthreading)
    >> > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express chipset
    >> >
    >> > As best I can tell, all of these components support hardware-assisted
    >> > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    >> >
    >> > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed the
    >> > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    >> > following are set to ENABLED:
    >> > - Virtualization Technology
    >> > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    >> > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    >> >
    >> > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V running.
    >> >
    >> > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in
    >> > the
    >> > log:
    >> > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in
    >> > the
    >> > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform supported
    >> > by
    >> > Hyper-V.
    >> > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not
    >> > enabled
    >> > in
    >> > BIOS
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    >> > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    >> > everything
    >> > I've read)
    >> > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest
    >> > versions)
    >> > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea
    >> > what)
    >> >
    >> > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale has
    >> > to
    >> > be
    >> > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I originally
    >> > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my
    >> > locale
    >> > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to all
    >> > the
    >> > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V (twice,
    >> > for
    >> > good measure). The problem remains.
    >> >
    >> > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really appreciate
    >> > it.
    >> > I
    >> > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't want
    >> > to
    >> > use
    >> > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the
    >> > OS.
    >> >
    >> > Thanks in advance!
    >> >
    >> > John
    >>
    >>

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #5


    JohnD Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled i

    Hi Charlie

    I've checked and it has the latest BIOS (actually the only one, since it's a
    fairly new motherboard). And yes, I did completely power off after changing
    the BIOS settings - and just to be sure, I pulled the power cord out for
    about 10 seconds.

    I've got a question in with the manufacturer, Gigabyte, so I'm hoping
    they'll be able to help - just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed anything
    obvious that someone on here would know about

    Thanks for your advice.

    John

    "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:

    > Then I'd check with the mobo mfg and see if there's a BIOS update. I can't
    > see a reason why it shouldn't enable. (You _have_ done a full power off
    > reboot since making the BIOS changes, correct?)
    >
    > --
    > Charlie.
    > http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >
    > "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    > news:B5A39881-6B92-4453-9C8C-6A1769377BA7@xxxxxx

    > > Hi Charlie
    > >
    > > Thanks for your reply. Actually that's one thing I neglected to mention -
    > > I
    > > did try turning off hyper-threading, and it made no difference.
    > >
    > > Thanks
    > >
    > > John
    > >
    > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    > >

    > >> Well, you've got newer hardware than I do. But I'd strongly suspect that
    > >> you
    > >> should be turning OFF hyper-threading. I'd certainly give that a try, at
    > >> least.
    > >>
    > >> --
    > >> Charlie.
    > >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    > >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    > >>
    > >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    > >> news:4C148E52-2700-49D2-A903-96C2CC9EED6D@xxxxxx
    > >> > Hello,
    > >> >
    > >> > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    > >> > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    > >> > hyperthreading)
    > >> > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express chipset
    > >> >
    > >> > As best I can tell, all of these components support hardware-assisted
    > >> > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    > >> >
    > >> > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed the
    > >> > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    > >> > following are set to ENABLED:
    > >> > - Virtualization Technology
    > >> > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    > >> > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    > >> >
    > >> > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V running.
    > >> >
    > >> > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in
    > >> > the
    > >> > log:
    > >> > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in
    > >> > the
    > >> > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform supported
    > >> > by
    > >> > Hyper-V.
    > >> > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not
    > >> > enabled
    > >> > in
    > >> > BIOS
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    > >> > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    > >> > everything
    > >> > I've read)
    > >> > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest
    > >> > versions)
    > >> > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea
    > >> > what)
    > >> >
    > >> > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale has
    > >> > to
    > >> > be
    > >> > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I originally
    > >> > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my
    > >> > locale
    > >> > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to all
    > >> > the
    > >> > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V (twice,
    > >> > for
    > >> > good measure). The problem remains.
    > >> >
    > >> > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really appreciate
    > >> > it.
    > >> > I
    > >> > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't want
    > >> > to
    > >> > use
    > >> > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the
    > >> > OS.
    > >> >
    > >> > Thanks in advance!
    > >> >
    > >> > John
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    >

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #6


    Charlie Russel - MVP Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled i

    A lot of folks are having some teething issues with the BIOS for these new
    mobos, so I wouldn't be surprised to find that there's an issue.

    One other thing did occur to me. There are two versions of each edition of
    Windows Server 2008. One with, and one without, Hyper-V. If you
    inadvertently installed the one without hyper-v, you need to re-install from
    scratch.

    --
    Charlie.
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel

    "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    news:8A4BEF06-CBE2-4179-900E-A7A302F9DFC9@xxxxxx

    > Hi Charlie
    >
    > I've checked and it has the latest BIOS (actually the only one, since it's
    > a
    > fairly new motherboard). And yes, I did completely power off after
    > changing
    > the BIOS settings - and just to be sure, I pulled the power cord out for
    > about 10 seconds.
    >
    > I've got a question in with the manufacturer, Gigabyte, so I'm hoping
    > they'll be able to help - just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed
    > anything
    > obvious that someone on here would know about
    >
    > Thanks for your advice.
    >
    > John
    >
    > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    >

    >> Then I'd check with the mobo mfg and see if there's a BIOS update. I
    >> can't
    >> see a reason why it shouldn't enable. (You _have_ done a full power off
    >> reboot since making the BIOS changes, correct?)
    >>
    >> --
    >> Charlie.
    >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >>
    >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    >> news:B5A39881-6B92-4453-9C8C-6A1769377BA7@xxxxxx

    >> > Hi Charlie
    >> >
    >> > Thanks for your reply. Actually that's one thing I neglected to
    >> > mention -
    >> > I
    >> > did try turning off hyper-threading, and it made no difference.
    >> >
    >> > Thanks
    >> >
    >> > John
    >> >
    >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> Well, you've got newer hardware than I do. But I'd strongly suspect
    >> >> that
    >> >> you
    >> >> should be turning OFF hyper-threading. I'd certainly give that a try,
    >> >> at
    >> >> least.
    >> >>
    >> >> --
    >> >> Charlie.
    >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >> >>
    >> >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    >> >> news:4C148E52-2700-49D2-A903-96C2CC9EED6D@xxxxxx
    >> >> > Hello,
    >> >> >
    >> >> > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    >> >> > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    >> >> > hyperthreading)
    >> >> > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express
    >> >> > chipset
    >> >> >
    >> >> > As best I can tell, all of these components support
    >> >> > hardware-assisted
    >> >> > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed
    >> >> > the
    >> >> > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    >> >> > following are set to ENABLED:
    >> >> > - Virtualization Technology
    >> >> > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    >> >> > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    >> >> >
    >> >> > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V
    >> >> > running.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in
    >> >> > the
    >> >> > log:
    >> >> > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in
    >> >> > the
    >> >> > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform
    >> >> > supported
    >> >> > by
    >> >> > Hyper-V.
    >> >> > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not
    >> >> > enabled
    >> >> > in
    >> >> > BIOS
    >> >> >
    >> >> >
    >> >> > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    >> >> > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    >> >> > everything
    >> >> > I've read)
    >> >> > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest
    >> >> > versions)
    >> >> > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea
    >> >> > what)
    >> >> >
    >> >> > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale
    >> >> > has
    >> >> > to
    >> >> > be
    >> >> > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I
    >> >> > originally
    >> >> > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my
    >> >> > locale
    >> >> > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to
    >> >> > all
    >> >> > the
    >> >> > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V
    >> >> > (twice,
    >> >> > for
    >> >> > good measure). The problem remains.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really
    >> >> > appreciate
    >> >> > it.
    >> >> > I
    >> >> > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't
    >> >> > want
    >> >> > to
    >> >> > use
    >> >> > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the
    >> >> > OS.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Thanks in advance!
    >> >> >
    >> >> > John
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >>
    >>

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #7


    JohnD Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled i

    Hi Charlie - I had wondered about that as well actually. The media I have
    doesn't say whether it has Hyper-V or not. But Hyper-V was listed as an
    available server role after I'd installed the OS, so I assume it's the one
    with Hyper-V?

    John

    "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:

    > A lot of folks are having some teething issues with the BIOS for these new
    > mobos, so I wouldn't be surprised to find that there's an issue.
    >
    > One other thing did occur to me. There are two versions of each edition of
    > Windows Server 2008. One with, and one without, Hyper-V. If you
    > inadvertently installed the one without hyper-v, you need to re-install from
    > scratch.
    >
    > --
    > Charlie.
    > http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >
    > "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    > news:8A4BEF06-CBE2-4179-900E-A7A302F9DFC9@xxxxxx

    > > Hi Charlie
    > >
    > > I've checked and it has the latest BIOS (actually the only one, since it's
    > > a
    > > fairly new motherboard). And yes, I did completely power off after
    > > changing
    > > the BIOS settings - and just to be sure, I pulled the power cord out for
    > > about 10 seconds.
    > >
    > > I've got a question in with the manufacturer, Gigabyte, so I'm hoping
    > > they'll be able to help - just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed
    > > anything
    > > obvious that someone on here would know about
    > >
    > > Thanks for your advice.
    > >
    > > John
    > >
    > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    > >

    > >> Then I'd check with the mobo mfg and see if there's a BIOS update. I
    > >> can't
    > >> see a reason why it shouldn't enable. (You _have_ done a full power off
    > >> reboot since making the BIOS changes, correct?)
    > >>
    > >> --
    > >> Charlie.
    > >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    > >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    > >>
    > >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    > >> news:B5A39881-6B92-4453-9C8C-6A1769377BA7@xxxxxx
    > >> > Hi Charlie
    > >> >
    > >> > Thanks for your reply. Actually that's one thing I neglected to
    > >> > mention -
    > >> > I
    > >> > did try turning off hyper-threading, and it made no difference.
    > >> >
    > >> > Thanks
    > >> >
    > >> > John
    > >> >
    > >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    > >> >
    > >> >> Well, you've got newer hardware than I do. But I'd strongly suspect
    > >> >> that
    > >> >> you
    > >> >> should be turning OFF hyper-threading. I'd certainly give that a try,
    > >> >> at
    > >> >> least.
    > >> >>
    > >> >> --
    > >> >> Charlie.
    > >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    > >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    > >> >>
    > >> >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    > >> >> news:4C148E52-2700-49D2-A903-96C2CC9EED6D@xxxxxx
    > >> >> > Hello,
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    > >> >> > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    > >> >> > hyperthreading)
    > >> >> > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express
    > >> >> > chipset
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > As best I can tell, all of these components support
    > >> >> > hardware-assisted
    > >> >> > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed
    > >> >> > the
    > >> >> > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    > >> >> > following are set to ENABLED:
    > >> >> > - Virtualization Technology
    > >> >> > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    > >> >> > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V
    > >> >> > running.
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in
    > >> >> > the
    > >> >> > log:
    > >> >> > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in
    > >> >> > the
    > >> >> > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform
    > >> >> > supported
    > >> >> > by
    > >> >> > Hyper-V.
    > >> >> > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not
    > >> >> > enabled
    > >> >> > in
    > >> >> > BIOS
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    > >> >> > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    > >> >> > everything
    > >> >> > I've read)
    > >> >> > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest
    > >> >> > versions)
    > >> >> > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea
    > >> >> > what)
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale
    > >> >> > has
    > >> >> > to
    > >> >> > be
    > >> >> > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I
    > >> >> > originally
    > >> >> > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my
    > >> >> > locale
    > >> >> > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to
    > >> >> > all
    > >> >> > the
    > >> >> > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V
    > >> >> > (twice,
    > >> >> > for
    > >> >> > good measure). The problem remains.
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really
    > >> >> > appreciate
    > >> >> > it.
    > >> >> > I
    > >> >> > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't
    > >> >> > want
    > >> >> > to
    > >> >> > use
    > >> >> > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the
    > >> >> > OS.
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > Thanks in advance!
    > >> >> >
    > >> >> > John
    > >> >>
    > >> >>
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    >

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #8


    Charlie Russel - MVP Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled i

    I honestly don't know. I've never used the non-hyper-v version, so can't say
    what is there or not.

    --
    Charlie.
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel

    "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    news6AE9C77-289D-41B4-9459-32BA19E149FA@xxxxxx

    > Hi Charlie - I had wondered about that as well actually. The media I have
    > doesn't say whether it has Hyper-V or not. But Hyper-V was listed as an
    > available server role after I'd installed the OS, so I assume it's the one
    > with Hyper-V?
    >
    > John
    >
    > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    >

    >> A lot of folks are having some teething issues with the BIOS for these
    >> new
    >> mobos, so I wouldn't be surprised to find that there's an issue.
    >>
    >> One other thing did occur to me. There are two versions of each edition
    >> of
    >> Windows Server 2008. One with, and one without, Hyper-V. If you
    >> inadvertently installed the one without hyper-v, you need to re-install
    >> from
    >> scratch.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Charlie.
    >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >>
    >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    >> news:8A4BEF06-CBE2-4179-900E-A7A302F9DFC9@xxxxxx

    >> > Hi Charlie
    >> >
    >> > I've checked and it has the latest BIOS (actually the only one, since
    >> > it's
    >> > a
    >> > fairly new motherboard). And yes, I did completely power off after
    >> > changing
    >> > the BIOS settings - and just to be sure, I pulled the power cord out
    >> > for
    >> > about 10 seconds.
    >> >
    >> > I've got a question in with the manufacturer, Gigabyte, so I'm hoping
    >> > they'll be able to help - just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed
    >> > anything
    >> > obvious that someone on here would know about
    >> >
    >> > Thanks for your advice.
    >> >
    >> > John
    >> >
    >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> Then I'd check with the mobo mfg and see if there's a BIOS update. I
    >> >> can't
    >> >> see a reason why it shouldn't enable. (You _have_ done a full power
    >> >> off
    >> >> reboot since making the BIOS changes, correct?)
    >> >>
    >> >> --
    >> >> Charlie.
    >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >> >>
    >> >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    >> >> news:B5A39881-6B92-4453-9C8C-6A1769377BA7@xxxxxx
    >> >> > Hi Charlie
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Thanks for your reply. Actually that's one thing I neglected to
    >> >> > mention -
    >> >> > I
    >> >> > did try turning off hyper-threading, and it made no difference.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Thanks
    >> >> >
    >> >> > John
    >> >> >
    >> >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
    >> >> >
    >> >> >> Well, you've got newer hardware than I do. But I'd strongly suspect
    >> >> >> that
    >> >> >> you
    >> >> >> should be turning OFF hyper-threading. I'd certainly give that a
    >> >> >> try,
    >> >> >> at
    >> >> >> least.
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> --
    >> >> >> Charlie.
    >> >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    >> >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    >> >> >> news:4C148E52-2700-49D2-A903-96C2CC9EED6D@xxxxxx
    >> >> >> > Hello,
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    >> >> >> > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    >> >> >> > hyperthreading)
    >> >> >> > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express
    >> >> >> > chipset
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > As best I can tell, all of these components support
    >> >> >> > hardware-assisted
    >> >> >> > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed
    >> >> >> > the
    >> >> >> > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that
    >> >> >> > the
    >> >> >> > following are set to ENABLED:
    >> >> >> > - Virtualization Technology
    >> >> >> > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    >> >> >> > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V
    >> >> >> > running.
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors
    >> >> >> > in
    >> >> >> > the
    >> >> >> > log:
    >> >> >> > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors
    >> >> >> > in
    >> >> >> > the
    >> >> >> > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform
    >> >> >> > supported
    >> >> >> > by
    >> >> >> > Hyper-V.
    >> >> >> > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not
    >> >> >> > enabled
    >> >> >> > in
    >> >> >> > BIOS
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    >> >> >> > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    >> >> >> > everything
    >> >> >> > I've read)
    >> >> >> > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the
    >> >> >> > latest
    >> >> >> > versions)
    >> >> >> > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no
    >> >> >> > idea
    >> >> >> > what)
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the
    >> >> >> > locale
    >> >> >> > has
    >> >> >> > to
    >> >> >> > be
    >> >> >> > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I
    >> >> >> > originally
    >> >> >> > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed
    >> >> >> > my
    >> >> >> > locale
    >> >> >> > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that
    >> >> >> > to
    >> >> >> > all
    >> >> >> > the
    >> >> >> > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V
    >> >> >> > (twice,
    >> >> >> > for
    >> >> >> > good measure). The problem remains.
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really
    >> >> >> > appreciate
    >> >> >> > it.
    >> >> >> > I
    >> >> >> > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't
    >> >> >> > want
    >> >> >> > to
    >> >> >> > use
    >> >> >> > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall
    >> >> >> > the
    >> >> >> > OS.
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > Thanks in advance!
    >> >> >> >
    >> >> >> > John
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >>
    >>

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #9


    JohnD Guest

    RE: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in BI

    Hi all,

    Just FYI, I got a reply from Gigabyte, the manufacturer of the motherboard,
    who essentially said that I shouldn't be trying to run a server OS on a
    desktop board and to please switch to Vista.

    I'm not particularly happy with this response so I've gone back to them, but
    if anyone has this model of board (EX58-DS4) and HAS managed to get Hyper-V
    running, I'd be really keen to find out whether there were any special things
    you had to do to make it work.

    And if anyone else has any ideas, I'd also be very keen to hear them!

    Thanks,

    John

    "JohnD" wrote:

    > Hello,
    >
    > I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    > - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    > hyperthreading)
    > - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express chipset
    >
    > As best I can tell, all of these components support hardware-assisted
    > virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    >
    > I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed the
    > Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    > following are set to ENABLED:
    > - Virtualization Technology
    > - No-Execute Memory Protect
    > (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    >
    > In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V running.
    >
    > However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in the log:
    > - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in the
    > system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform supported by
    > Hyper-V.
    > - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in
    > BIOS
    >
    >
    > I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    > - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from everything
    > I've read)
    > - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest versions)
    > - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea what)
    >
    > I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale has to be
    > set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I originally
    > installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my locale
    > (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to all the
    > reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V (twice, for
    > good measure). The problem remains.
    >
    > If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really appreciate it. I
    > had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't want to use
    > it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the OS.
    >
    > Thanks in advance!
    >
    > John

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #10


    Charlie Russel - MVP Guest

    Re: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in BI

    Well, one strong idea - change motherboard manufacturers! I'm sorry, that's
    not an acceptable answer, IMHO.

    --
    Charlie.
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
    http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel

    "JohnD" <JohnD@xxxxxx> wrote in message
    news:9A21086D-990B-4D60-83F8-B3151B848D5F@xxxxxx

    > Hi all,
    >
    > Just FYI, I got a reply from Gigabyte, the manufacturer of the
    > motherboard,
    > who essentially said that I shouldn't be trying to run a server OS on a
    > desktop board and to please switch to Vista.
    >
    > I'm not particularly happy with this response so I've gone back to them,
    > but
    > if anyone has this model of board (EX58-DS4) and HAS managed to get
    > Hyper-V
    > running, I'd be really keen to find out whether there were any special
    > things
    > you had to do to make it work.
    >
    > And if anyone else has any ideas, I'd also be very keen to hear them!
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > John
    >
    > "JohnD" wrote:
    >

    >> Hello,
    >>
    >> I just got a new PC with the following specs:
    >> - Intel Core i7 920 processor (4 physical cores @ 2.79GHz, with
    >> hyperthreading)
    >> - Gigabyte EX58-DS4 motherboard, which has an Intel X58 Express chipset
    >>
    >> As best I can tell, all of these components support hardware-assisted
    >> virtualization and should be sufficient for Hyper-V.
    >>
    >> I've installed Windows Server 2008 x64 edition and have installed the
    >> Hyper-V role. I've also been into the BIOS and have ensured that the
    >> following are set to ENABLED:
    >> - Virtualization Technology
    >> - No-Execute Memory Protect
    >> (I should note that hyperthreading is also turned on.)
    >>
    >> In my understanding, this should be sufficient to get Hyper-V running.
    >>
    >> However, whenever I go into the Hyper-V manager, I see two errors in the
    >> log:
    >> - Error 32: Hyper-V launch failed; at least one of the processors in the
    >> system does not appear to provide a virtualization platform supported by
    >> Hyper-V.
    >> - Error 42: Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled
    >> in
    >> BIOS
    >>
    >>
    >> I've been tearing my hair out trying to work out whether:
    >> - My hardware just doesn't support it (which seems unlikely from
    >> everything
    >> I've read)
    >> - My BIOS or drivers need updating (I've got them all at the latest
    >> versions)
    >> - I'm missing a setting in the BIOS setup screen (but I have no idea
    >> what)
    >>
    >> I saw a couple of posts from various people saying that the locale has to
    >> be
    >> set to English (United States) for Hyper-V to work. When I originally
    >> installed the OS, I had English (New Zealand). I've since changed my
    >> locale
    >> (and made the same change to the system locale, AND applied that to all
    >> the
    >> reserved accounts). I then uninstalled and reinstalled Hyper-V (twice,
    >> for
    >> good measure). The problem remains.
    >>
    >> If anyone would be able to help me out with this I'd really appreciate
    >> it. I
    >> had specifically bought this machine to run Hyper-V, and I don't want to
    >> use
    >> it for anything else in the meantime in case I need to reinstall the OS.
    >>
    >> Thanks in advance!
    >>
    >> John

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Hyper-V launch failed; Either VMX not present or not enabled in BI

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hyper-V-VMMS Failed to register service principal name MartinH Virtual Server 1 05 Nov 2009
Script Must Be Enabled Error But It Is Enabled Dell Boy Vista General 3 03 Nov 2008
Cannot manage an Hyper-V on Core from a full installed W2K8 with Hyper-V... Daniel Falconetti Virtual Server 2 23 Oct 2008
Vista Backup applet failed to launch Guangjie Vista General 5 23 Dec 2007
Failed to update the registry at first launch of programme Paul (Bornival) Vista installation & setup 6 24 Jun 2007