![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Hyper-V networking Hi On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single physical server). Integration services are installed on all VMs. All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no connectivity" with an IP of 169.x.x.x. In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a DHCP Server in the range of 192.168.x.x The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard (S5000XVN): Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and all VMs have the VLAN ID 1. What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not show the point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? Thanks for your help. Patrick |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way they'll get an IP address, is there? -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single physical > server). > Integration services are installed on all VMs. > > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no connectivity" with > an > IP of 169.x.x.x. > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a DHCP > Server > in the range of 192.168.x.x > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard (S5000XVN): > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. > > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and all VMs > have > the VLAN ID 1. > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not show the > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? > > Thanks for your help. > > Patrick |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking Hi does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution on one physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is not on this physical machine? Patrick "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: Quote: > Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way they'll > get an IP address, is there? > > -- > Charlie. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > > "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx Quote: > > Hi > > > > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single physical > > server). > > Integration services are installed on all VMs. > > > > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no connectivity" with > > an > > IP of 169.x.x.x. > > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a DHCP > > Server > > in the range of 192.168.x.x > > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard (S5000XVN): > > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. > > > > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and all VMs > > have > > the VLAN ID 1. > > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not show the > > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel > > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. > > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? > > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Patrick > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking No, it means that with an external network in hyper-v, the _physical_ nic doesn't have an IP address or run TCP/IP at all. If you set your network to be on a vlan, it doesn't communicate with other computers that aren't on that vlan. Hyper-V networking is very different from anything we've worked with before - it's NOT a bridge, unlike VS or VMWare. I'd _start_ by configuring without any vlan stuff, make sure you get everything working. If you need DHCP to the computers that are on the vlan, you'll want to make sure you have a DHCP server that will be on that same vlan. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:35480BD0-DFAC-4DA4-8E7D-98539FC16D6D@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution on one > physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is not on > this physical machine? > > Patrick > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > Quote: >> Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way >> they'll >> get an IP address, is there? >> >> -- >> Charlie. >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx Quote: >> > Hi >> > >> > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single >> > physical >> > server). >> > Integration services are installed on all VMs. >> > >> > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no connectivity" >> > with >> > an >> > IP of 169.x.x.x. >> > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a DHCP >> > Server >> > in the range of 192.168.x.x >> > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard >> > (S5000XVN): >> > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. >> > >> > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and all VMs >> > have >> > the VLAN ID 1. >> > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not show >> > the >> > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel >> > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. >> > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? >> > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? >> > >> > Thanks for your help. >> > >> > Patrick >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking Hi Charlie well, then I should go away from this test-solution, with external dhcp. The final configuration will have a SBS 2008 (with dhcp) virtually on the same vlan like all other servers. Will this virtual SBS 2008 be able to give an IP to physical clients in the same domain? Patrick "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: Quote: > No, it means that with an external network in hyper-v, the _physical_ nic > doesn't have an IP address or run TCP/IP at all. If you set your network to > be on a vlan, it doesn't communicate with other computers that aren't on > that vlan. > > Hyper-V networking is very different from anything we've worked with > before - it's NOT a bridge, unlike VS or VMWare. I'd _start_ by configuring > without any vlan stuff, make sure you get everything working. If you need > DHCP to the computers that are on the vlan, you'll want to make sure you > have a DHCP server that will be on that same vlan. > > -- > Charlie. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > > "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:35480BD0-DFAC-4DA4-8E7D-98539FC16D6D@xxxxxx Quote: > > Hi > > > > does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution on one > > physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is not on > > this physical machine? > > > > Patrick > > > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > > Quote: > >> Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way > >> they'll > >> get an IP address, is there? > >> > >> -- > >> Charlie. > >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 > >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > >> > >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message > >> news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single > >> > physical > >> > server). > >> > Integration services are installed on all VMs. > >> > > >> > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no connectivity" > >> > with > >> > an > >> > IP of 169.x.x.x. > >> > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a DHCP > >> > Server > >> > in the range of 192.168.x.x > >> > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard > >> > (S5000XVN): > >> > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. > >> > > >> > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and all VMs > >> > have > >> > the VLAN ID 1. > >> > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not show > >> > the > >> > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel > >> > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. > >> > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? > >> > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? > >> > > >> > Thanks for your help. > >> > > >> > Patrick > >> > >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking Of course. But in that case I would not put it on an external network. I would run the SBS domain on a private virtual network. You can then use DHCP on this network and not interfere with the DHCP service on the physical LAN. "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:E9AE8922-C5D1-4D91-9851-F4191C2E3CFE@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi Charlie > > well, then I should go away from this test-solution, with external dhcp. > The > final configuration will have a SBS 2008 (with dhcp) virtually on the same > vlan like all other servers. > Will this virtual SBS 2008 be able to give an IP to physical clients in > the > same domain? > > Patrick > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > Quote: >> No, it means that with an external network in hyper-v, the _physical_ nic >> doesn't have an IP address or run TCP/IP at all. If you set your network >> to >> be on a vlan, it doesn't communicate with other computers that aren't on >> that vlan. >> >> Hyper-V networking is very different from anything we've worked with >> before - it's NOT a bridge, unlike VS or VMWare. I'd _start_ by >> configuring >> without any vlan stuff, make sure you get everything working. If you need >> DHCP to the computers that are on the vlan, you'll want to make sure you >> have a DHCP server that will be on that same vlan. >> >> -- >> Charlie. >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:35480BD0-DFAC-4DA4-8E7D-98539FC16D6D@xxxxxx Quote: >> > Hi >> > >> > does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution on >> > one >> > physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is not >> > on >> > this physical machine? >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: >> > >> >> Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way >> >> they'll >> >> get an IP address, is there? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Charlie. >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single >> >> > physical >> >> > server). >> >> > Integration services are installed on all VMs. >> >> > >> >> > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no connectivity" >> >> > with >> >> > an >> >> > IP of 169.x.x.x. >> >> > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a DHCP >> >> > Server >> >> > in the range of 192.168.x.x >> >> > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard >> >> > (S5000XVN): >> >> > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. >> >> > >> >> > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and all >> >> > VMs >> >> > have >> >> > the VLAN ID 1. >> >> > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not >> >> > show >> >> > the >> >> > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel >> >> > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. >> >> > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? >> >> > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for your help. >> >> > >> >> > Patrick >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking Hi my final solution will only have one dhcp. The sbs 2008 virtualized. Can I still put the single physical server hyper-v solution on a external network in this case? Patrick "Bill Grant" wrote: Quote: > Of course. But in that case I would not put it on an external network. I > would run the SBS domain on a private virtual network. You can then use DHCP > on this network and not interfere with the DHCP service on the physical LAN. > > > "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:E9AE8922-C5D1-4D91-9851-F4191C2E3CFE@xxxxxx Quote: > > Hi Charlie > > > > well, then I should go away from this test-solution, with external dhcp. > > The > > final configuration will have a SBS 2008 (with dhcp) virtually on the same > > vlan like all other servers. > > Will this virtual SBS 2008 be able to give an IP to physical clients in > > the > > same domain? > > > > Patrick > > > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > > Quote: > >> No, it means that with an external network in hyper-v, the _physical_ nic > >> doesn't have an IP address or run TCP/IP at all. If you set your network > >> to > >> be on a vlan, it doesn't communicate with other computers that aren't on > >> that vlan. > >> > >> Hyper-V networking is very different from anything we've worked with > >> before - it's NOT a bridge, unlike VS or VMWare. I'd _start_ by > >> configuring > >> without any vlan stuff, make sure you get everything working. If you need > >> DHCP to the computers that are on the vlan, you'll want to make sure you > >> have a DHCP server that will be on that same vlan. > >> > >> -- > >> Charlie. > >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 > >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > >> > >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message > >> news:35480BD0-DFAC-4DA4-8E7D-98539FC16D6D@xxxxxx > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution on > >> > one > >> > physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is not > >> > on > >> > this physical machine? > >> > > >> > Patrick > >> > > >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > >> > > >> >> Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way > >> >> they'll > >> >> get an IP address, is there? > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Charlie. > >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 > >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > >> >> > >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message > >> >> news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx > >> >> > Hi > >> >> > > >> >> > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single > >> >> > physical > >> >> > server). > >> >> > Integration services are installed on all VMs. > >> >> > > >> >> > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no connectivity" > >> >> > with > >> >> > an > >> >> > IP of 169.x.x.x. > >> >> > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a DHCP > >> >> > Server > >> >> > in the range of 192.168.x.x > >> >> > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard > >> >> > (S5000XVN): > >> >> > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. > >> >> > > >> >> > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and all > >> >> > VMs > >> >> > have > >> >> > the VLAN ID 1. > >> >> > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not > >> >> > show > >> >> > the > >> >> > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel > >> >> > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. > >> >> > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? > >> >> > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks for your help. > >> >> > > >> >> > Patrick > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking As long as you realize that all machines on the physical network will see the DHCP service running on the SBS server. "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:6850A0D5-D8F8-4F24-A211-01B1126A7657@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > my final solution will only have one dhcp. The sbs 2008 virtualized. Can I > still put the single physical server hyper-v solution on a external > network > in this case? > > Patrick > > "Bill Grant" wrote: > Quote: >> Of course. But in that case I would not put it on an external network. >> I >> would run the SBS domain on a private virtual network. You can then use >> DHCP >> on this network and not interfere with the DHCP service on the physical >> LAN. >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:E9AE8922-C5D1-4D91-9851-F4191C2E3CFE@xxxxxx Quote: >> > Hi Charlie >> > >> > well, then I should go away from this test-solution, with external >> > dhcp. >> > The >> > final configuration will have a SBS 2008 (with dhcp) virtually on the >> > same >> > vlan like all other servers. >> > Will this virtual SBS 2008 be able to give an IP to physical clients in >> > the >> > same domain? >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: >> > >> >> No, it means that with an external network in hyper-v, the _physical_ >> >> nic >> >> doesn't have an IP address or run TCP/IP at all. If you set your >> >> network >> >> to >> >> be on a vlan, it doesn't communicate with other computers that aren't >> >> on >> >> that vlan. >> >> >> >> Hyper-V networking is very different from anything we've worked with >> >> before - it's NOT a bridge, unlike VS or VMWare. I'd _start_ by >> >> configuring >> >> without any vlan stuff, make sure you get everything working. If you >> >> need >> >> DHCP to the computers that are on the vlan, you'll want to make sure >> >> you >> >> have a DHCP server that will be on that same vlan. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Charlie. >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> news:35480BD0-DFAC-4DA4-8E7D-98539FC16D6D@xxxxxx >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution >> >> > on >> >> > one >> >> > physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is >> >> > not >> >> > on >> >> > this physical machine? >> >> > >> >> > Patrick >> >> > >> >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way >> >> >> they'll >> >> >> get an IP address, is there? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Charlie. >> >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> >> news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx >> >> >> > Hi >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single >> >> >> > physical >> >> >> > server). >> >> >> > Integration services are installed on all VMs. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no >> >> >> > connectivity" >> >> >> > with >> >> >> > an >> >> >> > IP of 169.x.x.x. >> >> >> > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a >> >> >> > DHCP >> >> >> > Server >> >> >> > in the range of 192.168.x.x >> >> >> > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard >> >> >> > (S5000XVN): >> >> >> > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and >> >> >> > all >> >> >> > VMs >> >> >> > have >> >> >> > the VLAN ID 1. >> >> >> > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not >> >> >> > show >> >> >> > the >> >> >> > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel >> >> >> > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. >> >> >> > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? >> >> >> > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks for your help. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Patrick >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking I think you'll want your host on a fixed IP, not relying on a DHCP server running as a guest. Your host should have at least 2 NICs, one reserved for itself; other(s) for the guest(s). So, for example: Edge device lan ip 192.168.0.1 (static) Host nic one 192.168.0.2 (static) Host nic two will "host" the hyper-v switch, it won't have an IP (as Charlie explained), and will be an "external" network. You specify this NIC when you create the network. Your SBS guest will have a NIC, and will use the network above - fixed IP 192.168.0.3 SBS will provide DHCP for the 192.168.0.0 network. Any other machines, physical, or virtual (if connected to the above "external network") will be served by the SBS DHCP. -- ----------------------------------------------- Les Connor [SBS MVP] "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:6850A0D5-D8F8-4F24-A211-01B1126A7657@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > my final solution will only have one dhcp. The sbs 2008 virtualized. Can I > still put the single physical server hyper-v solution on a external > network > in this case? > > Patrick > > "Bill Grant" wrote: > Quote: >> Of course. But in that case I would not put it on an external network. >> I >> would run the SBS domain on a private virtual network. You can then use >> DHCP >> on this network and not interfere with the DHCP service on the physical >> LAN. >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:E9AE8922-C5D1-4D91-9851-F4191C2E3CFE@xxxxxx Quote: >> > Hi Charlie >> > >> > well, then I should go away from this test-solution, with external >> > dhcp. >> > The >> > final configuration will have a SBS 2008 (with dhcp) virtually on the >> > same >> > vlan like all other servers. >> > Will this virtual SBS 2008 be able to give an IP to physical clients in >> > the >> > same domain? >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: >> > >> >> No, it means that with an external network in hyper-v, the _physical_ >> >> nic >> >> doesn't have an IP address or run TCP/IP at all. If you set your >> >> network >> >> to >> >> be on a vlan, it doesn't communicate with other computers that aren't >> >> on >> >> that vlan. >> >> >> >> Hyper-V networking is very different from anything we've worked with >> >> before - it's NOT a bridge, unlike VS or VMWare. I'd _start_ by >> >> configuring >> >> without any vlan stuff, make sure you get everything working. If you >> >> need >> >> DHCP to the computers that are on the vlan, you'll want to make sure >> >> you >> >> have a DHCP server that will be on that same vlan. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Charlie. >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> news:35480BD0-DFAC-4DA4-8E7D-98539FC16D6D@xxxxxx >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution >> >> > on >> >> > one >> >> > physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is >> >> > not >> >> > on >> >> > this physical machine? >> >> > >> >> > Patrick >> >> > >> >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way >> >> >> they'll >> >> >> get an IP address, is there? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Charlie. >> >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> >> news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx >> >> >> > Hi >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single >> >> >> > physical >> >> >> > server). >> >> >> > Integration services are installed on all VMs. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no >> >> >> > connectivity" >> >> >> > with >> >> >> > an >> >> >> > IP of 169.x.x.x. >> >> >> > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a >> >> >> > DHCP >> >> >> > Server >> >> >> > in the range of 192.168.x.x >> >> >> > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard >> >> >> > (S5000XVN): >> >> >> > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and >> >> >> > all >> >> >> > VMs >> >> >> > have >> >> >> > the VLAN ID 1. >> >> >> > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not >> >> >> > show >> >> >> > the >> >> >> > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel >> >> >> > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. >> >> >> > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? >> >> >> > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks for your help. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Patrick >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V networking The parent (host) really should not use DHCP if your only DHCP server is on a VM. Far better to simply give it a fixed IP address. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:6850A0D5-D8F8-4F24-A211-01B1126A7657@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > my final solution will only have one dhcp. The sbs 2008 virtualized. Can I > still put the single physical server hyper-v solution on a external > network > in this case? > > Patrick > > "Bill Grant" wrote: > Quote: >> Of course. But in that case I would not put it on an external network. >> I >> would run the SBS domain on a private virtual network. You can then use >> DHCP >> on this network and not interfere with the DHCP service on the physical >> LAN. >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:E9AE8922-C5D1-4D91-9851-F4191C2E3CFE@xxxxxx Quote: >> > Hi Charlie >> > >> > well, then I should go away from this test-solution, with external >> > dhcp. >> > The >> > final configuration will have a SBS 2008 (with dhcp) virtually on the >> > same >> > vlan like all other servers. >> > Will this virtual SBS 2008 be able to give an IP to physical clients in >> > the >> > same domain? >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: >> > >> >> No, it means that with an external network in hyper-v, the _physical_ >> >> nic >> >> doesn't have an IP address or run TCP/IP at all. If you set your >> >> network >> >> to >> >> be on a vlan, it doesn't communicate with other computers that aren't >> >> on >> >> that vlan. >> >> >> >> Hyper-V networking is very different from anything we've worked with >> >> before - it's NOT a bridge, unlike VS or VMWare. I'd _start_ by >> >> configuring >> >> without any vlan stuff, make sure you get everything working. If you >> >> need >> >> DHCP to the computers that are on the vlan, you'll want to make sure >> >> you >> >> have a DHCP server that will be on that same vlan. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Charlie. >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> news:35480BD0-DFAC-4DA4-8E7D-98539FC16D6D@xxxxxx >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > does that mean, that with an "external network" an hyper-v solution >> >> > on >> >> > one >> >> > physical server can not communicate with a physical dhcp, which is >> >> > not >> >> > on >> >> > this physical machine? >> >> > >> >> > Patrick >> >> > >> >> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Do you have any DHCP server _on that VLAN_? If not, there's no way >> >> >> they'll >> >> >> get an IP address, is there? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Charlie. >> >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 >> >> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> >> >> >> "Patrick D." <PatrickD@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> >> >> news:793DB2CA-4CAB-4527-9904-F4016655DC8A@xxxxxx >> >> >> > Hi >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On a full installation of W2k8 Enterprise I have Hyper-V (single >> >> >> > physical >> >> >> > server). >> >> >> > Integration services are installed on all VMs. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > All network-connections in the VMs have "limited or no >> >> >> > connectivity" >> >> >> > with >> >> >> > an >> >> >> > IP of 169.x.x.x. >> >> >> > In case of normal connection, the VMs would obtain an IP from a >> >> >> > DHCP >> >> >> > Server >> >> >> > in the range of 192.168.x.x >> >> >> > The physical network adapter is on a brand new intel-mainboard >> >> >> > (S5000XVN): >> >> >> > Intel Pro/1000 EB Network Connection with I/O Acceleration. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I chosed "external network type" in Virtual Network Manager and >> >> >> > all >> >> >> > VMs >> >> >> > have >> >> >> > the VLAN ID 1. >> >> >> > What I discovered is, that the physical network adapter does not >> >> >> > show >> >> >> > the >> >> >> > point "VLAN ID" under Device-Manager/Network adapters/Intel >> >> >> > Nic/Properties/Advanced/Property. >> >> >> > Is this the reason, why my VMs have no connection? >> >> >> > Or what is the reason for this isolation of the VMs? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks for your help. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Patrick >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hyper-V Networking "doesn't work" - the fix | Virtual Server | |||
| Cannot manage an Hyper-V on Core from a full installed W2K8 with Hyper-V... | Virtual Server | |||
| Hyper-v and wireless networking | Virtual Server | |||
| Hyper-V Setup - Networking Question | Virtual Server | |||
| Re: hyper-v networking | Virtual Server | |||