|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
 |
| |
01-15-2009
| #1 (permalink) |
| | Memory on Windows 2003 Standard/VS I understandand that Windows 2003 Standard only allows 4gb of Ram. I was just wondering that if only 4gb is allocated to the host would I still be able to use the remaining ram for my Virtual Servers or would I have to upgrade to Windows 2003 Enterprise on the host before I can allocate the remaining ram? Thanks ICTuser |
My System Specs |
|
01-15-2009
| #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Memory on Windows 2003 Standard/VS Virtual Server wont be able to see the RAM if the host operating system doesn't, so yes, you'd need Enterprise to use more than 4G. -- Bob Comer On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:58:02 -0800 (PST), ICT User <ictuser2002@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >I understandand that Windows 2003 Standard only allows 4gb of Ram. I >was just wondering that if only 4gb is allocated to the host would I >still be able to use the remaining ram for my Virtual Servers or would >I have to upgrade to Windows 2003 Enterprise on the host before I can >allocate the remaining ram? > >Thanks > >ICTuser |
| My System Specs |
|
01-15-2009
| #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Memory on Windows 2003 Standard/VS Or Windows Server 2003 x64 Standard Edition. The 64-bit Standard will see 32 GB of RAM. Of course, the OP's processor and environments will need to support 64-bit. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Robert Comer" <bobcomer-removeme-@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:gknum4lp5hduilpm5oee6napfariejlssu@xxxxxx Quote: > Virtual Server wont be able to see the RAM if the host operating > system doesn't, so yes, you'd need Enterprise to use more than 4G. > > -- > Bob Comer > > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:58:02 -0800 (PST), ICT User > <ictuser2002@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quote: >>I understandand that Windows 2003 Standard only allows 4gb of Ram. I >>was just wondering that if only 4gb is allocated to the host would I >>still be able to use the remaining ram for my Virtual Servers or would >>I have to upgrade to Windows 2003 Enterprise on the host before I can >>allocate the remaining ram? >> >>Thanks >> >>ICTuser |
| My System Specs |
|
01-15-2009
| #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Memory on Windows 2003 Standard/VS Good point. -- Bob Comer On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:48:21 -0800, "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Or Windows Server 2003 x64 Standard Edition. The 64-bit Standard will see 32 >GB of RAM. Of course, the OP's processor and environments will need to >support 64-bit. |
| My System Specs |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista Business 64 Bit - workgroup - windows 2003 standard fax serv | Vista print fax & scan | |||
| Code-signing certificates and MS Server 2003 Standard | PowerShell | |||
| Re: Vista very slow with Outlook 2003, memory leak? | Vista mail | |||
| Can't install Office 2003 Standard Edition in Vista | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Re: Vista very slow with Outlook 2003, memory leak? | Vista mail | |||
