Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Misc Newsgroups > Virtual Server

Vista - Hyper-V and Disk types

Reply
 
Old 01-26-2009   #1 (permalink)
news.microsoft.com


 
 

Hyper-V and Disk types

Basically, I am curious how the performance works out on Hyper-V. If for
example, I had a SAS drive setup to host my VM's hard drive, if I configured
the VM for IDE I would take a performance hit correct? And if this is the
case, what is the reason to have any VM's use IDE as it is possible that
later on they could be placed on a faster BUS. The only reason I can think
is compatability, for example if you cannot use SCSI devices in your OS or
something. Please enlighten me.

Thanks!



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 01-26-2009   #2 (permalink)
Charlie Russel - MVP


 
 

Re: Hyper-V and Disk types

You're incorrect. The actual choice of IDE v. SCSI has nothing whatsoever to
do with the underlying physical hardware. It is purely a question of which
drivers are available at that point in the process. Thus you always have to
choose IDE for a system boot drive, because of how the synthetic SCSI driver
works. But there is no performance hit at all.

I tend to use IDE for the system drive, and add a SCSI bus and drives VMs
that need more than 2 drives/VHDs.

You can not choose SCSI for any OS that doesn't have available Integration
Components, since the drivers won't be available.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel

"news.microsoft.com" <None@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23T8HMh$fJHA.5244@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Basically, I am curious how the performance works out on Hyper-V. If for
> example, I had a SAS drive setup to host my VM's hard drive, if I
> configured the VM for IDE I would take a performance hit correct? And if
> this is the case, what is the reason to have any VM's use IDE as it is
> possible that later on they could be placed on a faster BUS. The only
> reason I can think is compatability, for example if you cannot use SCSI
> devices in your OS or something. Please enlighten me.
>
> Thanks!
>
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 01-26-2009   #3 (permalink)
news.microsoft.com


 
 

Re: Hyper-V and Disk types

Got it! Thank you!!!


"Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23VGyFSAgJHA.824@xxxxxx
Quote:

> You're incorrect. The actual choice of IDE v. SCSI has nothing whatsoever
> to do with the underlying physical hardware. It is purely a question of
> which drivers are available at that point in the process. Thus you always
> have to choose IDE for a system boot drive, because of how the synthetic
> SCSI driver works. But there is no performance hit at all.
>
> I tend to use IDE for the system drive, and add a SCSI bus and drives VMs
> that need more than 2 drives/VHDs.
>
> You can not choose SCSI for any OS that doesn't have available Integration
> Components, since the drivers won't be available.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
> "news.microsoft.com" <None@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23T8HMh$fJHA.5244@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> Basically, I am curious how the performance works out on Hyper-V. If for
>> example, I had a SAS drive setup to host my VM's hard drive, if I
>> configured the VM for IDE I would take a performance hit correct? And if
>> this is the case, what is the reason to have any VM's use IDE as it is
>> possible that later on they could be placed on a faster BUS. The only
>> reason I can think is compatability, for example if you cannot use SCSI
>> devices in your OS or something. Please enlighten me.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Hyper-V standalone vs Hyper-V windows 2008 Core Virtual Server
dynamic disk always in offline state when VM restarts in Hyper-v Virtual Server
Disk controler with hyper-v Virtual Server
Cannot manage an Hyper-V on Core from a full installed W2K8 with Hyper-V... Virtual Server


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46