![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | New to VS2005 Question and a comment. I am 100% under the impression that vmware is for a "server" to run "xp" and have multiple machines connect to this as their desktop. Or atleast some version of that thought. My company is thinking of going with some version of vmware where you need to install multiple versions of "xp" on the server so this can be customized for individual "houses / vlans". Thats fine, but they started taking consolidation of our servers. My company wants to combine our Exchange, Payroll and BES into one server. To me I would need to install 2003 Server three times on one VM. To me that makes zero sense. The above is an example of one machine and then what do I do with our file and SQL servers. Create a second VM? We have five fairly new HP servers (<2 years) that should be able to run a company of 400 computers and 500 users. My opinion. My question is where and when should you use vmware? Really its useless to me and is just reinventing the wheele if you will. I am new to vmware itself but think I have a grasp on its usage. TIA Bill |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: New to VS2005 "bondo" <bondo@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:6C4E0836-07E8-42BF-A8F4-B1692DC30814@xxxxxx Quote: > Question and a comment. > > I am 100% under the impression that vmware is for a "server" to run "xp" > and > have multiple machines connect to this as their desktop. Or atleast some > version of that thought. My company is thinking of going with some version > of > vmware where you need to install multiple versions of "xp" on the server > so > this can be customized for individual "houses / vlans". > Thats fine, but they started taking consolidation of our servers. My > company > wants to combine our Exchange, Payroll and BES into one server. > To me I would need to install 2003 Server three times on one VM. To me > that > makes zero sense. > The above is an example of one machine and then what do I do with our file > and SQL servers. Create a second VM? We have five fairly new HP servers > (<2 > years) that should be able to run a company of 400 computers and 500 > users. > My opinion. > > My question is where and when should you use vmware? Really its useless to > me and is just reinventing the wheele if you will. > I am new to vmware itself but think I have a grasp on its usage. > > TIA > Bill This forum is for Microsoft Virtual Server, not VMWare! What you are discussing doesn't sound like a use for either of those products. Have a look at this article on desktop virtualization. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VDI Server virtualization is something that you can do with Virtual Server or VMWare or Microsoft Hyper-V in Server 2008. Yes, you do run multiple virtual machines on each physical server, and each vm has its own OS. See this FAQ for the pros and cons of doing this. http://www.itmanagement.com/faq/server-virtualization/ |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| vpc 2007 vs vs2005 | Virtual PC | |||
| VS2005/VPC2007 | Virtual PC | |||
| VS2005 | Vista General | |||
| VS2005 | Vista General | |||