![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Hyper-V and Physical RAID Hi, I am building a box. I was going to do the following: Disk 1) RAID 1 Disk 2) RAID 5 Disk 3) RAID 1 Disk 4) RAID 10 I am going to install the Hyper-V parent on Disk 1. The first child server partition will be the SBS 2008 Premium primary server, and the second will be the secondary server for SQL. Main point here is that Exchange is on one, and SQL is on the other. Both Exchange and SQL use DB's which are split into db files and transaction logs. "Best practice" dictates that you store db files and transaction logs on separate physical hard disks. In keeping with this recommendation I wanted to map the VHDs to physical disks that support this type of configuration. Is this possible? If it isn't impossible are there any other problems here with what I am looking to do? Am I being old-fashioned here and would be better off just getting one massive RAID 5? TIA, Jarryd |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| hyper-v - teaming recommded at physical host ? | Virtual Server | |||
| Hyper-V cached physical memory | Virtual Server | |||
| Migrating physical server to Hyper-V: what options? | Virtual Server | |||
| Cannot manage an Hyper-V on Core from a full installed W2K8 with Hyper-V... | Virtual Server | |||
| Hyper-V and Raid Configuration | Virtual Server | |||