![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | High availability with FC-HBA We are trying to test a dual Hyper-V configuration and its failover capabilities. Each blade is running Hyper-V/Windows 2008(Core). They are connected via a 4GB fiberchannel HBA to a FC-switch and then to our SAN. Each Hyper-V also has two GB-Enet cards. For our test, we have a two VM (Vista) running on the first server with their VHD files on the SAN on LUN #12. Only the first CORE has that disk enabled and mapped to a volume (V but the second CORE does see the disk.Can you point me towards a process to set up an environment where I can easily shutdown one of the VMs on Core #1 and start it on Core #2. The risk, obviously, is that both Cores have to talk to the same LUN on the same SAN. Thanks in advance for any help. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: High availability with FC-HBA Welcome to Windows Clustering. Yes, you can cluster Core. You need to first create a quorum disk and cluster the two core nodes. Then you can bring the LUNs into the cluster management as cluster storage resources. Clustering manages multi-connected storage and handles the failover/failback implementation. If you want more than one VM per LUN and you want them to fail over independently, you need to run Windows 2008 R2. If you don't mind them failing over together and always being on the same host, then you can stay with Windows 2008 -- Geoff N. Hiten Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Dave W" <DaveW@newsgroup> wrote in message news:29096D14-5709-46FC-A133-29221673643E@newsgroup Quote: > We are trying to test a dual Hyper-V configuration and its failover > capabilities. Each blade is running Hyper-V/Windows 2008(Core). They are > connected via a 4GB fiberchannel HBA to a FC-switch and then to our SAN. > Each > Hyper-V also has two GB-Enet cards. > > For our test, we have a two VM (Vista) running on the first server with > their VHD files on the SAN on LUN #12. Only the first CORE has that disk > enabled and mapped to a volume (V but the second CORE does see the disk.> > Can you point me towards a process to set up an environment where I can > easily shutdown one of the VMs on Core #1 and start it on Core #2. The > risk, > obviously, is that both Cores have to talk to the same LUN on the same > SAN. > > Thanks in advance for any help. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Fax & Scan Availability | Vista print fax & scan | |||
| HA (High availability) | Virtual Server | |||
| Last hope to get solution provided real Hyper-V high availability. | Virtual Server | |||
| Vista SP1 availability | Vista General | |||
| RC2 Availability | Vista General | |||