![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets Hello: I'm getting ready to set up a test AD environment with two subnets so that I can create two AD sites based on them. All VMs will be on the same host. How will the two subnets communicate? Is there any inherent way in Hyper-V to setup routing between two private virtual networks on different subnets? If not, is there some other way to get this to work? -- Thank you, Mel K. MCSA: M, Ex2000 MCTS: Ex2007 |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message news:OEFEXylKKHA.4168@newsgroup Quote: > Hello: > > I'm getting ready to set up a test AD environment with two subnets so that > I can create two AD sites based on them. All VMs will be on the same host. > How will the two subnets communicate? Is there any inherent way in Hyper-V > to setup routing between two private virtual networks on different > subnets? If not, is there some other way to get this to work? > > -- > Thank you, > Mel K. > MCSA: M, Ex2000 > MCTS: Ex2007 > solution is to run one vm as a router between the subnets. You can run a Windows server OS with RRAS, or a Linux OS if you are familiar with that. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets I just found this: http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_stra...n-hyper-v.aspx (Vyatta Virtual Router on Hyper-V). I might give it a try. Hopefully MS puts this type of functionality in future Hyper-V release. I think it's a key feature for testing and development. -- Thank you, Mel K. MCSA: M, Ex2000 MCTS: Ex2007 "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message news:eJ03Y0pKKHA.6016@newsgroup Quote: > > > "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message > news:OEFEXylKKHA.4168@newsgroup Quote: >> Hello: >> >> I'm getting ready to set up a test AD environment with two subnets so >> that I can create two AD sites based on them. All VMs will be on the same >> host. How will the two subnets communicate? Is there any inherent way in >> Hyper-V to setup routing between two private virtual networks on >> different subnets? If not, is there some other way to get this to work? >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Mel K. >> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >> MCTS: Ex2007 >> > solution is to run one vm as a router between the subnets. You can run a > Windows server OS with RRAS, or a Linux OS if you are familiar with that. > > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets That should be fine if you are familiar with Linux. Why would Microsoft include it in Hyper-V? "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message news:#7ZEg1wKKHA.1248@newsgroup Quote: > I just found this: > http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_stra...n-hyper-v.aspx > (Vyatta Virtual Router on Hyper-V). I might give it a try. Hopefully MS > puts this type of functionality in future Hyper-V release. I think it's a > key feature for testing and development. > > -- > Thank you, > Mel K. > MCSA: M, Ex2000 > MCTS: Ex2007 > "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message > news:eJ03Y0pKKHA.6016@newsgroup Quote: >> >> >> "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message >> news:OEFEXylKKHA.4168@newsgroup Quote: >>> Hello: >>> >>> I'm getting ready to set up a test AD environment with two subnets so >>> that I can create two AD sites based on them. All VMs will be on the >>> same host. How will the two subnets communicate? Is there any inherent >>> way in Hyper-V to setup routing between two private virtual networks on >>> different subnets? If not, is there some other way to get this to work? >>> >>> -- >>> Thank you, >>> Mel K. >>> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >>> MCTS: Ex2007 >>> >> solution is to run one vm as a router between the subnets. You can run a >> Windows server OS with RRAS, or a Linux OS if you are familiar with that. >> >> >> >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets I don't mean that MS should put Vyatta into Hyper-V, but they should include a virtual router. They already have virtual switches, so why not a simple virtual router so that IT folks can set up test subnets without having to set up a VM to do the routing. I have a desktop with 4 GB of RAM running Hyper-V, so adding an extra VM for routing is going to take up more of the limited resources. -- Mel K. MCSA: M, Ex2000 MCTS: Ex2007 "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message news:uXDI$J2KKHA.4608@newsgroup Quote: > That should be fine if you are familiar with Linux. > > Why would Microsoft include it in Hyper-V? > > > "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message > news:#7ZEg1wKKHA.1248@newsgroup Quote: >> I just found this: >> http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_stra...n-hyper-v.aspx >> (Vyatta Virtual Router on Hyper-V). I might give it a try. Hopefully MS >> puts this type of functionality in future Hyper-V release. I think it's a >> key feature for testing and development. >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Mel K. >> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >> MCTS: Ex2007 >> "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message >> news:eJ03Y0pKKHA.6016@newsgroup Quote: >>> >>> >>> "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message >>> news:OEFEXylKKHA.4168@newsgroup >>>> Hello: >>>> >>>> I'm getting ready to set up a test AD environment with two subnets so >>>> that I can create two AD sites based on them. All VMs will be on the >>>> same host. How will the two subnets communicate? Is there any inherent >>>> way in Hyper-V to setup routing between two private virtual networks on >>>> different subnets? If not, is there some other way to get this to work? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thank you, >>>> Mel K. >>>> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >>>> MCTS: Ex2007 >>>> >>> No, there is no in-built routing between virtual networks. The simplest >>> solution is to run one vm as a router between the subnets. You can run a >>> Windows server OS with RRAS, or a Linux OS if you are familiar with >>> that. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets I think that would be a bad idea. Microsoft put a DHCP service into virtual networks in Virtual Server. It confused more people than it helped. Every Windows Server OS already has a router included. "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message news:e4CFri9KKHA.1336@newsgroup Quote: > I don't mean that MS should put Vyatta into Hyper-V, but they should > include a virtual router. They already have virtual switches, so why not a > simple virtual router so that IT folks can set up test subnets without > having to set up a VM to do the routing. I have a desktop with 4 GB of RAM > running Hyper-V, so adding an extra VM for routing is going to take up > more of the limited resources. > > -- > Mel K. > MCSA: M, Ex2000 > MCTS: Ex2007 > "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message > news:uXDI$J2KKHA.4608@newsgroup Quote: >> That should be fine if you are familiar with Linux. >> >> Why would Microsoft include it in Hyper-V? >> >> >> "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message >> news:#7ZEg1wKKHA.1248@newsgroup Quote: >>> I just found this: >>> http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_stra...n-hyper-v.aspx >>> (Vyatta Virtual Router on Hyper-V). I might give it a try. Hopefully MS >>> puts this type of functionality in future Hyper-V release. I think it's >>> a key feature for testing and development. >>> >>> -- >>> Thank you, >>> Mel K. >>> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >>> MCTS: Ex2007 >>> "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message >>> news:eJ03Y0pKKHA.6016@newsgroup >>>> >>>> >>>> "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message >>>> news:OEFEXylKKHA.4168@newsgroup >>>>> Hello: >>>>> >>>>> I'm getting ready to set up a test AD environment with two subnets so >>>>> that I can create two AD sites based on them. All VMs will be on the >>>>> same host. How will the two subnets communicate? Is there any inherent >>>>> way in Hyper-V to setup routing between two private virtual networks >>>>> on different subnets? If not, is there some other way to get this to >>>>> work? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Mel K. >>>>> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >>>>> MCTS: Ex2007 >>>>> >>>> No, there is no in-built routing between virtual networks. The >>>> simplest solution is to run one vm as a router between the subnets. You >>>> can run a Windows server OS with RRAS, or a Linux OS if you are >>>> familiar with that. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets Personally, I disagree. I wish there were a virtual router available for just these sorts of scenarios. Yes, I've worked around it by creating a small Server 2k3 VM and enabling RRAS on it. But a fast, resource sparing, virtual router would be a nice addition. And not terribly difficult to implement, I would think. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message news:OoNM%23DDLKHA.4236@newsgroup Quote: > I think that would be a bad idea. Microsoft put a DHCP service into > virtual networks in Virtual Server. It confused more people than it > helped. > > Every Windows Server OS already has a router included. > > "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message > news:e4CFri9KKHA.1336@newsgroup Quote: >> I don't mean that MS should put Vyatta into Hyper-V, but they should >> include a virtual router. They already have virtual switches, so why not >> a simple virtual router so that IT folks can set up test subnets without >> having to set up a VM to do the routing. I have a desktop with 4 GB of >> RAM running Hyper-V, so adding an extra VM for routing is going to take >> up more of the limited resources. >> >> -- >> Mel K. >> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >> MCTS: Ex2007 >> "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message >> news:uXDI$J2KKHA.4608@newsgroup Quote: >>> That should be fine if you are familiar with Linux. >>> >>> Why would Microsoft include it in Hyper-V? >>> >>> >>> "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message >>> news:#7ZEg1wKKHA.1248@newsgroup >>>> I just found this: >>>> http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_stra...n-hyper-v.aspx >>>> (Vyatta Virtual Router on Hyper-V). I might give it a try. Hopefully MS >>>> puts this type of functionality in future Hyper-V release. I think it's >>>> a key feature for testing and development. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thank you, >>>> Mel K. >>>> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >>>> MCTS: Ex2007 >>>> "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message >>>> news:eJ03Y0pKKHA.6016@newsgroup >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Mel K." <Mel@newsgroup> wrote in message >>>>> news:OEFEXylKKHA.4168@newsgroup >>>>>> Hello: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm getting ready to set up a test AD environment with two subnets so >>>>>> that I can create two AD sites based on them. All VMs will be on the >>>>>> same host. How will the two subnets communicate? Is there any >>>>>> inherent way in Hyper-V to setup routing between two private virtual >>>>>> networks on different subnets? If not, is there some other way to get >>>>>> this to work? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> Mel K. >>>>>> MCSA: M, Ex2000 >>>>>> MCTS: Ex2007 >>>>>> >>>>> No, there is no in-built routing between virtual networks. The >>>>> simplest solution is to run one vm as a router between the subnets. >>>>> You can run a Windows server OS with RRAS, or a Linux OS if you are >>>>> familiar with that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@newsgroup> wrote in message news:#Vd2LZFLKHA.3708@newsgroup Quote: > Personally, I disagree. I wish there were a virtual router available for > just these sorts of scenarios. Yes, I've worked around it by creating a > small Server 2k3 VM and enabling RRAS on it. But a fast, resource sparing, > virtual router would be a nice addition. And not terribly difficult to > implement, I would think. > number of dedicated Linux routers available. Microsoft open sourcing the driver components is going to be a really big deal for Hyper-V and small one box networks. -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets yes, I'm sure. but I'd still far rather see this implemented as part of Hyper-V itself. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Kerry Brown" <kerry@newsgroup-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message news:es8ZG2JLKHA.5732@newsgroup Quote: > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@newsgroup> wrote in message > news:#Vd2LZFLKHA.3708@newsgroup Quote: >> Personally, I disagree. I wish there were a virtual router available for >> just these sorts of scenarios. Yes, I've worked around it by creating a >> small Server 2k3 VM and enabling RRAS on it. But a fast, resource >> sparing, virtual router would be a nice addition. And not terribly >> difficult to implement, I would think. >> > When the integration components are in the Linux kernel there will be any > number of dedicated Linux routers available. Microsoft open sourcing the > driver components is going to be a really big deal for Hyper-V and small > one box networks. > > -- > Kerry Brown > MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration > http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ > > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Hyper-V, private virtual networks on different subnets Agreed. Why would we want to install a Linux router on a MS Hyper-V box? If I did that, I might end up liking Linux and telling my manager that we should deploy more Linux servers =\ I don't think MS would like that. -- Mel K. MCSA: M, Ex2000 MCTS: Ex2007 "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@newsgroup> wrote in message news:OuO%23VeaLKHA.4376@newsgroup Quote: > yes, I'm sure. but I'd still far rather see this implemented as part of > Hyper-V itself. > > -- > Charlie. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/xperts64 > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > > > "Kerry Brown" <kerry@newsgroup-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message > news:es8ZG2JLKHA.5732@newsgroup Quote: >> >> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@newsgroup> wrote in message >> news:#Vd2LZFLKHA.3708@newsgroup Quote: >>> Personally, I disagree. I wish there were a virtual router available for >>> just these sorts of scenarios. Yes, I've worked around it by creating a >>> small Server 2k3 VM and enabling RRAS on it. But a fast, resource >>> sparing, virtual router would be a nice addition. And not terribly >>> difficult to implement, I would think. >>> >> When the integration components are in the Linux kernel there will be any >> number of dedicated Linux routers available. Microsoft open sourcing the >> driver components is going to be a really big deal for Hyper-V and small >> one box networks. >> >> -- >> Kerry Brown >> MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration >> http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Understanding and Optimizing Virtual Networks in Hyper-V | Virtual Server | |||
| Wireless connection to public & private networks | Network & Sharing | |||
| Public and Private Networks | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| Private and public networks | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| Public/Private Networks Multiple NIC | Vista networking & sharing | |||