![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | child OS local only connectivity, can only ping itself Hi, I set this up a while ago and didn't have this problem, so I am sure this is something really silly I am overlooking and hoping it is an easy for someone to crack. I have a server 2008 core with only the hyper-v role enabled. It has two NICs (dual port broadcom). I used Hyper-V Manager to remote manger the Hyper-V host. I used Virtual Network Manager to create an External network called "Hyper-V switch" and bound it to the second NIC. The aforementioned physical NIC's IP settings are: IP: 10.124.6.254/22 Gateway: 10.124.4.254 I then created my first virtual machine and added a virtual NIC assigned to the "Hyper-V switch" network I created earlier. I found that after the child OS (Small Biz Srvr 2008) had been installed I could not get it to connect to anything. First I saw that it couldn't resolve the DNS forwarder addresses. I checked my Watchguard firewall policies and that's not it - no traffic is being logged. The child OS's IP settings are as follows: IP:10.124.6.1/22 Gateway: 10.124.4.254 I tried to ping the host and it fails with "reply 10.124.6.1: destination host unreachable". I found this in a technet article about this reply: "If the message is "Reply From < IP address >: Destination Host Unreachable," then the routing problem occurred at a remote router, whose address is indicated by the "< IP address >" field. Use the appropriate utility or facility to check the IP routing table of the router assigned the IP address of < IP address >." The thing is that the IP in the reply is the IP of the child OS's NIC, so what can that mean? To be sure it is not the Windows Firewall I disabled this using netsh, both on the client OS and the host. Still no luck. It can also not ping the Watchgaurd gateway address 10.124.4.254 from the child. The host OS can ping the Watchgaurd gateway no problem, but if it pings the child it returns "reply 10.124.6.254: destination host unreachable". Integration services has been installed. The RTM version of Hyper-V (6.0.6001.18016) is installed. Please help. TIA, Jarryd |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: child OS local only connectivity, can only ping itself "Jarryd" <jarryd@newsgroup> wrote in message news:0FFD6C42-4398-4A28-92C5-FCE30A97E714@newsgroup Quote: > Hi, > > I set this up a while ago and didn't have this problem, so I am sure this > is something really silly I am overlooking and hoping it is an easy for > someone to crack. > > I have a server 2008 core with only the hyper-v role enabled. It has two > NICs (dual port broadcom). I used Hyper-V Manager to remote manger the > Hyper-V host. I used Virtual Network Manager to create an External > network called "Hyper-V switch" and bound it to the second NIC. The > aforementioned physical NIC's IP settings are: > IP: 10.124.6.254/22 > Gateway: 10.124.4.254 > > I then created my first virtual machine and added a virtual NIC assigned > to the "Hyper-V switch" network I created earlier. > > I found that after the child OS (Small Biz Srvr 2008) had been installed I > could not get it to connect to anything. First I saw that it couldn't > resolve the DNS forwarder addresses. I checked my Watchguard firewall > policies and that's not it - no traffic is being logged. The child OS's > IP settings are as follows: > IP:10.124.6.1/22 > Gateway: 10.124.4.254 > I tried to ping the host and it fails with "reply 10.124.6.1: destination > host unreachable". I found this in a technet article about this reply: > "If the message is "Reply From < IP address >: Destination Host > Unreachable," then the routing problem occurred at a remote router, whose > address is indicated by the "< IP address >" field. Use the appropriate > utility or facility to check the IP routing table of the router assigned > the IP address of < IP address >." > > The thing is that the IP in the reply is the IP of the child OS's NIC, so > what can that mean? To be sure it is not the Windows Firewall I disabled > this using netsh, both on the client OS and the host. Still no luck. It > can also not ping the Watchgaurd gateway address 10.124.4.254 from the > child. The host OS can ping the Watchgaurd gateway no problem, but if it > pings the child it returns "reply 10.124.6.254: destination host > unreachable". > > Integration services has been installed. The RTM version of Hyper-V > (6.0.6001.18016) is installed. > > Please help. > > TIA, > > Jarryd of the NIC as far as the parent partition is concerned. See this entry in Ben's blog. http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy...h-hyper-v.aspx |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: child OS local only connectivity, can only ping itself Hi Bill, To be honest I think that this was just one of those silly occasions where the best thing to do is delete and start again. What I did differently was this: 1.) configured the first NIC of the broadcom dualport card as the one to be used as the virtual switch, and 2.) the second one for management. 3.) I have a both these plugged into two separate ports on my watchgaurd firewall, let's not get into why, but for that reason I didn't configure the management NIC with a gateway address. 4.) I then removed (rather that simply reconfiguring) the virtual network using the Hyper-v Manager and recreating it using the first NIC (see point one above). 5.) I then reconfigured the child's virtual NIC to use the new network, and... VIOLA! Maybe none of the changes made a difference and just needed a fresh start, who knows. Shall we just not worry about it? Haha. Jarryd "Bill Grant" <not.available@newsgroup> wrote in message news:ekVpsXhRKHA.4020@newsgroup Quote: > > > "Jarryd" <jarryd@newsgroup> wrote in message > news:0FFD6C42-4398-4A28-92C5-FCE30A97E714@newsgroup Quote: >> Hi, >> >> I set this up a while ago and didn't have this problem, so I am sure this >> is something really silly I am overlooking and hoping it is an easy for >> someone to crack. >> >> I have a server 2008 core with only the hyper-v role enabled. It has two >> NICs (dual port broadcom). I used Hyper-V Manager to remote manger the >> Hyper-V host. I used Virtual Network Manager to create an External >> network called "Hyper-V switch" and bound it to the second NIC. The >> aforementioned physical NIC's IP settings are: >> IP: 10.124.6.254/22 >> Gateway: 10.124.4.254 >> >> I then created my first virtual machine and added a virtual NIC assigned >> to the "Hyper-V switch" network I created earlier. >> >> I found that after the child OS (Small Biz Srvr 2008) had been installed >> I could not get it to connect to anything. First I saw that it couldn't >> resolve the DNS forwarder addresses. I checked my Watchguard firewall >> policies and that's not it - no traffic is being logged. The child OS's >> IP settings are as follows: >> IP:10.124.6.1/22 >> Gateway: 10.124.4.254 >> I tried to ping the host and it fails with "reply 10.124.6.1: destination >> host unreachable". I found this in a technet article about this reply: >> "If the message is "Reply From < IP address >: Destination Host >> Unreachable," then the routing problem occurred at a remote router, whose >> address is indicated by the "< IP address >" field. Use the appropriate >> utility or facility to check the IP routing table of the router assigned >> the IP address of < IP address >." >> >> The thing is that the IP in the reply is the IP of the child OS's NIC, so >> what can that mean? To be sure it is not the Windows Firewall I disabled >> this using netsh, both on the client OS and the host. Still no luck. It >> can also not ping the Watchgaurd gateway address 10.124.4.254 from the >> child. The host OS can ping the Watchgaurd gateway no problem, but if it >> pings the child it returns "reply 10.124.6.254: destination host >> unreachable". >> >> Integration services has been installed. The RTM version of Hyper-V >> (6.0.6001.18016) is installed. >> >> Please help. >> >> TIA, >> >> Jarryd > When you create a virtual switch you completely change the configuration > of the NIC as far as the parent partition is concerned. See this entry in > Ben's blog. > > http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy...h-hyper-v.aspx > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Local connectivity versus 'local plus internet connectivity | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| Can't ping other local Vista PC using IP | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| Wireless connectivity - 'local only'? | Vista General | |||
| Re: Vista Premium - can't ping or see local machines | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| Vista Premium - Can't see or ping local computers | Vista General | |||