![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Administrator required to run applications? This is crazy. I am already a member of the administrators group in Vista. So, why do I have to run certain applications as administrator? Also, why does Windows Defender block some Windows programs such as System Configuration Utility and Secure Update from running? |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? Hello, In Windows Vista, even though you are an administrator, only the programs that you give permission to (via a "Windows needs your permission to continue" prompt) will be able to use your administrator powers. Programs that do not need admin powers (such as the calculator) will not ask for it and thus will not be able to do such things as format your hard drive. Really, why should <insert name of non-administrative program> be able to do system administration tasks? That's just begging for trouble. The benefits of this is: 1) Programs that do not need admin power, don't get it 2) You are aware of all programs that start with admin power and are able to deny programs access to your admin power (for example, if SeeTheDancingBears.exe request admin access to your computer, you can disallow it). All Windows Vista-compliant applications will automatically ask you for permission when they want to do administrative tasks. Legacy programs, or programs that generally don't need admin permission but may need such permission in certain scenarios (such as using notepad to edit the HOSTS file), you will need to explictly give them admin permission by right-clicking them and clicking Run As Administrator. To prevent a possible denial-of-service, programs that require administrative privileges CANNOT automatically start up when you log in / start your computer. Windows blocks these programs from running, instead of showing a bunch of prompts on every login. These programs should be updated to be Vista-compatible, if (or when) such updates are available. -- - JB Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? I could live with the permission thing if I could at least get into my own dam folders. -- Carl G "Jimmy Brush" <JimmyBrush@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:87CE8782-43C6-4ABE-B16B-15B84C843394@microsoft.com... > Hello, > > In Windows Vista, even though you are an administrator, only the programs > that you give permission to (via a "Windows needs your permission to > continue" prompt) will be able to use your administrator powers. > > Programs that do not need admin powers (such as the calculator) will not > ask for it and thus will not be able to do such things as format your hard > drive. > > Really, why should <insert name of non-administrative program> be able to > do system administration tasks? That's just begging for trouble. > > The benefits of this is: > > 1) Programs that do not need admin power, don't get it > > 2) You are aware of all programs that start with admin power and are able > to deny programs access to your admin power (for example, if > SeeTheDancingBears.exe request admin access to your computer, you can > disallow it). > > All Windows Vista-compliant applications will automatically ask you for > permission when they want to do administrative tasks. > > Legacy programs, or programs that generally don't need admin permission > but may need such permission in certain scenarios (such as using notepad > to edit the HOSTS file), you will need to explictly give them admin > permission by right-clicking them and clicking Run As Administrator. > > To prevent a possible denial-of-service, programs that require > administrative privileges CANNOT automatically start up when you log in / > start your computer. Windows blocks these programs from running, instead > of showing a bunch of prompts on every login. > > These programs should be updated to be Vista-compatible, if (or when) such > updates are available. > > > > -- > - JB > Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User > > Windows Vista Support Faq > http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? I agree with the other posters. This is NUTS! I was a very experienced XP user and now I have no idea how to use my new computer! If Microsoft doesn't fix the complexity of VISTA, the software will be a titanic failure, and Apple stock will soar. I hope I am wrong but my bet is that the average user will be very frustrated. "Carl G" wrote: > I could live with the permission thing if I could at least get into my own > dam folders. > > -- > Carl G > > "Jimmy Brush" <JimmyBrush@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:87CE8782-43C6-4ABE-B16B-15B84C843394@microsoft.com... > > Hello, > > > > In Windows Vista, even though you are an administrator, only the programs > > that you give permission to (via a "Windows needs your permission to > > continue" prompt) will be able to use your administrator powers. > > > > Programs that do not need admin powers (such as the calculator) will not > > ask for it and thus will not be able to do such things as format your hard > > drive. > > > > Really, why should <insert name of non-administrative program> be able to > > do system administration tasks? That's just begging for trouble. > > > > The benefits of this is: > > > > 1) Programs that do not need admin power, don't get it > > > > 2) You are aware of all programs that start with admin power and are able > > to deny programs access to your admin power (for example, if > > SeeTheDancingBears.exe request admin access to your computer, you can > > disallow it). > > > > All Windows Vista-compliant applications will automatically ask you for > > permission when they want to do administrative tasks. > > > > Legacy programs, or programs that generally don't need admin permission > > but may need such permission in certain scenarios (such as using notepad > > to edit the HOSTS file), you will need to explictly give them admin > > permission by right-clicking them and clicking Run As Administrator. > > > > To prevent a possible denial-of-service, programs that require > > administrative privileges CANNOT automatically start up when you log in / > > start your computer. Windows blocks these programs from running, instead > > of showing a bunch of prompts on every login. > > > > These programs should be updated to be Vista-compatible, if (or when) such > > updates are available. > > > > > > > > -- > > - JB > > Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User > > > > Windows Vista Support Faq > > http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ > > |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:11:58 -0500, Jimmy Brush wrote: > Hello, > > In Windows Vista, even though you are an administrator, only the programs > that you give permission to (via a "Windows needs your permission to > continue" prompt) will be able to use your administrator powers. > > Programs that do not need admin powers (such as the calculator) will not ask > for it and thus will not be able to do such things as format your hard > drive. > > Really, why should <insert name of non-administrative program> be able to do > system administration tasks? That's just begging for trouble. > > The benefits of this is: > > 1) Programs that do not need admin power, don't get it > > 2) You are aware of all programs that start with admin power and are able to > deny programs access to your admin power (for example, if > SeeTheDancingBears.exe request admin access to your computer, you can > disallow it). > > All Windows Vista-compliant applications will automatically ask you for > permission when they want to do administrative tasks. > > Legacy programs, or programs that generally don't need admin permission but > may need such permission in certain scenarios (such as using notepad to edit > the HOSTS file), you will need to explictly give them admin permission by > right-clicking them and clicking Run As Administrator. > > To prevent a possible denial-of-service, programs that require > administrative privileges CANNOT automatically start up when you log in / > start your computer. Windows blocks these programs from running, instead of > showing a bunch of prompts on every login. > > These programs should be updated to be Vista-compatible, if (or when) such > updates are available. In addition to what Jimmy has posted, there are other operating systems that have historically required extra steps to perform a task at system (root) level. Other operating systems may be a little more "smooth" about it but it's the same concept. In the long run, UAC works in your favor. I'll agree that it's a pain getting through software and driver installs and certain "tweaks." But once all is setup, UAC doesn't appear often at all. A few of the applications that I use caused too many prompts when installed under the protected "Program Files." Until Vista aware versions are released for those titles, I've created a folder "OtherApps" and install them there. Not as secure but, for now, but it eliminates the UAC prompts these apps would have caused if installed elsewhere. -- Sharon F MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? What folders are you having problems with? -- - JB Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? Hi Jimmy Why can't I open the temporary internet files folder under users , carl , local , temporary internet files. What is so security risking about that folder. There are lots of folders under local that have the shortcut arrow that are not accesable,such as the documents folder.picture,music,video folders.Why is that?they are my personal folders,why can't I get into them? I am the adminestrator and the only user on this PC. Just don't see all this security stuff. It is my computer,my instalation of windows, if I want to destroy it ,that is my perogative I would think. Thanks -- Carl G "Jimmy Brush" <JimmyBrush@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:878666FE-2A05-40A1-8CF4-96106937CF30@microsoft.com... > What folders are you having problems with? > > > -- > - JB > Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User > > Windows Vista Support Faq > http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? Well, The problem here is that those locations no longer exist in Windows Vista, hence you can't access them. Sure, you can still "see" some of the old locations, like you mentioned, if you have turned on the showing of hidden / OS files. But, these locations have been moved/renamed/replaced, and you need to learn the new locations. Technically, these things that you see that are transparent with a shortcut symbol are called junctions, and they are there to make some misbehaving programs work. To see what these locations have been replaced by, you can use the command prompt: - Open a command prompt - CD to the folder that contains the location that has moved - Type: dir /al It will list the old locations as '<JUNCTION>' or '<SYMLINKD>' and show their new location in brackets. -- - JB Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? Hi guys, I have a few problems around Vista which my PC vendor's team have been unable to resolve. No Vista knowledge at all! Anyone offer any help pls? 1) Outloook 2000 Error message: "An error occurreed while attempting to open the Windows Address Book. Unable to find the WAD DLL". ADDITIONAL INFO: There is an address book which I imported from old XP PC via Easy Transfer. I read somewhere that OE v6.0 checks WAB and detects corrupt WAB whereas prior versions WAB did not detect corruption. Might this be the problem? How I do a regenerate a new uncorrupted WAB? Aint OE v6 part of Vista OS so how do I do a partail reinstall? I cant even see the Vista OS in Uninstall Programs List (was OEM though I get get a a CD copy also). 2) UAC. All the Windows Vista guides talk about running 'secpol.msc' and 'gpedit.msc' to configure UAC. When I do a search apparently these files are NOT found? They MUST exist, right as part of OS? I think I cant see access/them due to Admin rights or something...though I am an Administrator Account Type as opposed to a Std User. Anyone any ideas? "Jimmy Brush" wrote: > Well, > > The problem here is that those locations no longer exist in Windows Vista, > hence you can't access them. > > Sure, you can still "see" some of the old locations, like you mentioned, if > you have turned on the showing of hidden / OS files. > > But, these locations have been moved/renamed/replaced, and you need to learn > the new locations. > > Technically, these things that you see that are transparent with a shortcut > symbol are called junctions, and they are there to make some misbehaving > programs work. > > To see what these locations have been replaced by, you can use the command > prompt: > > - Open a command prompt > - CD to the folder that contains the location that has moved > - Type: dir /al > > It will list the old locations as '<JUNCTION>' or '<SYMLINKD>' and show > their new location in brackets. > > > -- > - JB > Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User > > Windows Vista Support Faq > http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ > |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Administrator required to run applications? It's interesting that you are even running Outlook 2000 on the latest version of Windows. That's like putting regular gasoline in a Ferrari. C'mon dude, upgrade already; save yourself the unnecessary headache. "Steve" wrote: > Hi guys, I have a few problems around Vista which my PC vendor's team have > been unable to resolve. No Vista knowledge at all! Anyone offer any help pls? > > 1) Outloook 2000 > > Error message: "An error occurreed while attempting to open the Windows > Address Book. Unable to find the WAD DLL". > > ADDITIONAL INFO: There is an address book which I imported from old XP PC > via Easy Transfer. I read somewhere that OE v6.0 checks WAB and detects > corrupt WAB whereas prior versions WAB did not detect corruption. Might this > be the problem? How I do a regenerate a new uncorrupted WAB? Aint OE v6 > part of Vista OS so how do I do a partail reinstall? I cant even see the > Vista OS in Uninstall Programs List (was OEM though I get get a a CD copy > also). > > 2) UAC. All the Windows Vista guides talk about running 'secpol.msc' and > 'gpedit.msc' to configure UAC. When I do a search apparently these files are > NOT found? They MUST exist, right as part of OS? > > I think I cant see access/them due to Admin rights or something...though I > am an Administrator Account Type as opposed to a Std User. Anyone any ideas? > > > > > "Jimmy Brush" wrote: > > > Well, > > > > The problem here is that those locations no longer exist in Windows Vista, > > hence you can't access them. > > > > Sure, you can still "see" some of the old locations, like you mentioned, if > > you have turned on the showing of hidden / OS files. > > > > But, these locations have been moved/renamed/replaced, and you need to learn > > the new locations. > > > > Technically, these things that you see that are transparent with a shortcut > > symbol are called junctions, and they are there to make some misbehaving > > programs work. > > > > To see what these locations have been replaced by, you can use the command > > prompt: > > > > - Open a command prompt > > - CD to the folder that contains the location that has moved > > - Type: dir /al > > > > It will list the old locations as '<JUNCTION>' or '<SYMLINKD>' and show > > their new location in brackets. > > > > > > -- > > - JB > > Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User > > > > Windows Vista Support Faq > > http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ > > |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Account 'NAMED' Administrator vs. 'administrator rights' question | FireBrick | Vista installation & setup | 1 | 4 Weeks Ago 08:02 AM |
| Is there a way as an administrator in a domain to allow a standard user not to need credentials for only a few applications? | iruleyou1 | Vista account administration | 1 | 05-10-2008 01:32 AM |
| administrator signon required for program exicution | mcdonald0762 | Vista security | 1 | 01-15-2008 03:08 PM |
| Several applications are trying to access the internet to specific ip address 10.0.0.138 & 224.0.0.2, while ARE NOT internet applications! ref/eDN3072784783 | dennis | Vista General | 1 | 09-27-2007 06:08 AM |
| Install applications without administrator privilege? | zxli | Vista security | 5 | 12-29-2006 06:10 AM |