![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Vista Admin Queries I need to get a new laptop, but have never liked some of Windows XP's "features" - mainly that it often thinks it knows what I want better than I do! I'd like to find out about some things in Vista before going with that though, in case it's even worse than XP (which it may be if some of what I've heard is true). I currently use Windows 2000, as that was available at the time and I much prefer it to XP. Windows 2000 has "Power Users" as well as "Users" and "Administrators". I have found that some applications (mainly to do with software development / debugging) do not work when run as a User, but do work for a Power User. Hence I have always logged in using a Power User account (not wanting to run as an Administrator all the time!) I have set XP up with separate User and Administrator IDs for friends, but they have usually ended up still always logging in as an Administrator, having found that some of their software doesn't work for a User. I understand Vista does not have Power Users either, but are Users now able to do more, or am I going to be forced to log in as an Administrator to use some software? On a similar issue, I have seen some posts on these forums suggesting that even Administrators are usually only Users for most of the time, and are asked for Administrator access when programs need it (as are normal users). If this is the case, is there actually any point in setting up separate User and Administrator accounts? It seems to me that there is no real difference. Also on these forums, I have seen several reports of Adminsitrator users being denied access to certain files and directories. Is this supposed to be the case? Sometimes I find it useful to be able to alter or replace (possibly corrupted) system files to fix problems without needing a complete reinstall, or to remove stubborn viruses. I have also seen mention of a built-in Administrator account, and suggestions to give it a blank password in order to avoid having to type in a password when prompted for admin access. Is this not a security risk? If nothing else, Vista presumably still has the hidden C$ etc. shares for each drive, which would then be accessible by just about anyone? Thanks, Mark |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Vista Admin Queries Hello, In Windows Vista, programs that don't need admin power, don't receive it, regardless of whether you are an administrator. This is accomplished by prompting you for permission whenever a program runs that needs admin power, if you are an administrator. This allows you to know for sure which programs are running with admin privielges, and which aren't. This behavior of the administrator account is new in Windows Vista, but the nature of the admin account has not changed - i.e., both administrative and non-administrative programs run inside of your single admin account (There is not technically a non-admin user and an admin-user). If you are NOT an admin and you run a program that requires admin access, it will ask for the username and password for an administrator in order to continue, and that program will run as if it was started by that administrator account (like run as, in Windows XP). Admin accounts and user accounts are still different. Windows Vista takes great pains to ensure that many applications that do not work correctly as a standard user will work in Vista. Of course, this isn't perfect, but the situation is a lot better than it was with Windows XP. The "built-in" administrator account is disabled by default in Windows Vista, and is only kept around for an emergency- you can only use it in safe mode if you accidentally delete or get locked out of [via password policy] all of the other admin accounts on your computer. This makes the admin account with a blank password not much of a risk, since you cannot use it except in that limited way. Also, by default Windows Vista prevents you for remotely administering your machine using the admin shares unless you are part of a domain and are using a domain admin account. This does not affect remote desktop. You can change this behavior by modifying a registry value. -- - JB Microsoft MVP - Windows Shell/User Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: My latest count is 3,500,000 queries on the net about Vista failing to shut down - great product eh | DarkSentinel | Vista General | 0 | 03-15-2008 02:49 AM |
| Admin access to Vista Registry Remote & locally in Admin Approval | Gayle | Vista security | 0 | 10-24-2007 09:26 AM |
| Vista Outlook Express queries | MS | Vista mail | 4 | 07-24-2007 08:16 AM |
| Where can I post queries related to IIS 7.0 on Vista | Pushkar | Vista security | 2 | 08-09-2006 09:56 PM |
| Windows Vista Beta 2 Queries | Martin Healy | Vista installation & setup | 1 | 07-05-2006 07:07 AM |