![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | What happened to Virtual folders? I'm using Vista ultimate and was wondering where virtual folders went? Did it get dropped in the final? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Windows Vista x64 Ultimate | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? In Vista, the "Documents", "Pictures" and "Music" icons are all virtual folders, as are "Contacts", "Desktop", "Favourites", "Links", "Saved Games", "Searches" and "Videos". With the enhanced media capabilities of Vista, it odd that the "Videos" icon does no appear on the start menu or as a filter option in searches. Maybe that will be fixed in SP1? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? Hello, If you are referring to search folders, they are still there too. The most obvious one is "Recently Changed" under favorite links on the left in the save as dialog box. To make a search folder: - Click start - click search - Specify the parameters of the search and then run the search - In the blue-green toolbar, you have the option to Save Search. This will create a search folder. -- - JB Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User "Black Baptist" <pray@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:47491166$0$5301$9a566e8b@xxxxxx Quote: > I'm using Vista ultimate and was wondering where virtual folders went? Did > it get dropped in the final? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:01:42 -0600, dzomlija <dzomlija.30lk3d@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net> wrote: Quote: >No. Virtual Folders are still there. In Windows XP, the most often used >"Virtual Folder" was "My Documents". Folders? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? Hi, Paul. Virtual Folders don't actually hold any files. They just hold pointers to the files in the Real Folders. For example, you might have a photo in a file named Baby.jpg in a folder called Photos on Drive D:. The actual pathname would be D:\Photos\Baby.jpg. But if Vista recognizes that as a picture file, it might also put an entry in C:\Users\Paul\Pictures. It wouldn't actually make a second copy of Baby.jpg and put it on Drive C:; it would just put an entry in your Pictures folder pointing to the picture on Drive D:. In this example, D:\Photos is the real folder; Pictures is the virtual folder. I'm no expert on Virtual Folders, but this is my simplified understanding of the way it works. RC -- R. C. White, CPA San Marcos, TX rc@xxxxxx Microsoft Windows MVP (Running Windows Live Mail 2008 in Vista Ultimate x64) "Paul Knudsen" <pknudsen@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:bq4kk3t38ufai57upr72da4baqk4e81p0e@xxxxxx Quote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:01:42 -0600, dzomlija > <dzomlija.30lk3d@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net> wrote: > Quote: >>No. Virtual Folders are still there. In Windows XP, the most often used >>"Virtual Folder" was "My Documents". > OK, I'll bite. What's the difference between Virtual Folders and REAL > Folders? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Windows Vista x64 Ultimate | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? Hi, Paul. Virtual Folders don't actually hold any files. They just hold pointers to the files in the Real Folders. For example, you might have a photo in a file named Baby.jpg in a folder called Photos on Drive D:. The actual pathname would be D:\Photos\Baby.jpg. But if Vista recognizes that as a picture file, it might also put an entry in C:\Users\Paul\Pictures. It wouldn't actually make a second copy of Baby.jpg and put it on Drive C:; it would just put an entry in your Pictures folder pointing to the picture on Drive D:. In this example, D:\Photos is the real folder; Pictures is the virtual folder. I'm no expert on Virtual Folders, but this is my simplified understanding of the way it works. RC Virtual Folders are in their simplest form, are nothing more than shortcuts to any given folder, although even calling them a shortcut isn't fully describing what they are. In the case of the "Pictures" Virtual Folder, it's default location is indeed "C:\Users\<UserName>\Pictures". If there are photos in "D:\Photos", they will only show up in the Pictures virtual folder if its location has been changed to "D:\Photos". One of the advantages of a virtual folder is to help the system help you keep your stuff organized. For example, I've redirected my own "Pictures" to point to "E:\Pictures", as opposed to the default of "C:\Users\Peter Dzomlija\Pictures". If I right-click a picture in Internet Explorer and choose save as, the Save dialog is automatically opened to "E:\Pictures" so that a picture can be saved there. I can choose to save the image elsewhere if I want, but thats wher it opens. Basically, virtual folders provides for a pointer to common locations for folders. It is, of course, entirely up to the application developer whether they want to make use of this facility instead of maintaining their own list of common file locations. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? Hi, Peter. Thanks for the correction and clarification. RC -- R. C. White, CPA San Marcos, TX rc@xxxxxx Microsoft Windows MVP (Running Windows Live Mail 2008 in Vista Ultimate x64) "dzomlija" <dzomlija.30n5q7@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net> wrote in message news:dzomlija.30n5q7@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net... Quote: > > R. C. White;525158 Wrote: Quote: >> Hi, Paul. >> >> Virtual Folders don't actually hold any files. They just hold pointers >> to >> the files in the Real Folders. >> >> For example, you might have a photo in a file named Baby.jpg in a >> folder >> called Photos on Drive D:. The actual pathname would be >> D:\Photos\Baby.jpg. But if Vista recognizes that as a picture file, it >> might also put an entry in C:\Users\Paul\Pictures. It wouldn't actually >> make a second copy of Baby.jpg and put it on Drive C:; it would just put >> an entry in your Pictures folder pointing to the picture on Drive D:. In >> this example, D:\Photos is the real folder; Pictures is the virtual >> folder. >> >> I'm no expert on Virtual Folders, but this is my simplified >> understanding of >> the way it works. >> >> RC >> > While I have no desire to confuse the issue, that's not entirely > accurate, R.C. > > Virtual Folders are in their simplest form, are nothing more than > shortcuts to any given folder, although even calling them a shortcut > isn't fully describing what they are. > > In the case of the "Pictures" Virtual Folder, it's default location is > indeed "C:\Users\-_<UserName>_-\Pictures". If there are photos in > "D:\Photos", they will only show up in the Pictures virtual folder if > its location has been changed to "D:\Photos". > > One of the advantages of a virtual folder is to help the system help > you keep your stuff organized. For example, I've redirected my own > "Pictures" to point to "E:\Pictures", as opposed to the default of > "C:\Users\Peter Dzomlija\Pictures". If I right-click a picture in > Internet Explorer and choose save as, the Save dialog is automatically > opened to "E:\Pictures" so that a picture can be saved there. I can > choose to save the image elsewhere if I want, but thats wher it opens. > Basically, virtual folders provides for a pointer to common locations > for folders. > > It is, of course, entirely up to the application developer whether they > want to make use of this facility instead of maintaining their own list > of common file locations. > > > -- > dzomlija > > ____________________________________ > Peter Alexander Dzomlija > Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? -And as > you die, so shall I be Reborn-... > > - ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe > - AMD Atlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+ > - 4GB DDR400 > - ASUS nVidia 6600 > - Thermaltake Tai-Chi Watercooled Chassis > - 1207GB Total Formatted Storage > - Vista Ultimate x64 > - CodeGear Delphi 2007'http://dzomlija.spaces.live.com/' > (http://dzomlija.spaces.live.com/) |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? Thank you I found an app called HardlinkShellExt.exe that does what I'm looking for. "R. C. White" <rc@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:1913FF13-C729-4071-AB8C-B679CC9CC524@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi, Paul. > > Virtual Folders don't actually hold any files. They just hold pointers to > the files in the Real Folders. > > For example, you might have a photo in a file named Baby.jpg in a folder > called Photos on Drive D:. The actual pathname would be > D:\Photos\Baby.jpg. But if Vista recognizes that as a picture file, it > might also put an entry in C:\Users\Paul\Pictures. It wouldn't actually > make a second copy of Baby.jpg and put it on Drive C:; it would just put > an entry in your Pictures folder pointing to the picture on Drive D:. In > this example, D:\Photos is the real folder; Pictures is the virtual > folder. > > I'm no expert on Virtual Folders, but this is my simplified understanding > of the way it works. > > RC > -- > R. C. White, CPA > San Marcos, TX > rc@xxxxxx > Microsoft Windows MVP > (Running Windows Live Mail 2008 in Vista Ultimate x64) > > "Paul Knudsen" <pknudsen@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:bq4kk3t38ufai57upr72da4baqk4e81p0e@xxxxxx Quote: >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:01:42 -0600, dzomlija >> <dzomlija.30lk3d@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net> wrote: >> Quote: >>>No. Virtual Folders are still there. In Windows XP, the most often used >>>"Virtual Folder" was "My Documents". >> OK, I'll bite. What's the difference between Virtual Folders and REAL >> Folders? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: What happened to Virtual folders? Interesting. Thanks for the reply. On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:56:37 -0600, "R. C. White" <rc@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Hi, Paul. > >Virtual Folders don't actually hold any files. They just hold pointers to >the files in the Real Folders. > >For example, you might have a photo in a file named Baby.jpg in a folder >called Photos on Drive D:. The actual pathname would be D:\Photos\Baby.jpg. >But if Vista recognizes that as a picture file, it might also put an entry >in C:\Users\Paul\Pictures. It wouldn't actually make a second copy of >Baby.jpg and put it on Drive C:; it would just put an entry in your Pictures >folder pointing to the picture on Drive D:. In this example, D:\Photos is >the real folder; Pictures is the virtual folder. > >I'm no expert on Virtual Folders, but this is my simplified understanding of >the way it works. > >RC |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 'virtual' renaming of folders? | Vista file management | |||
| Wat happened to my files & folders? Wat should i do? | Vista General | |||
| Virtual folders | Vista General | |||
| What happened to tools=>folders=>compact all folders? | Vista mail | |||
| Can you create more Virtual Folders ?? | Vista General | |||