![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Searches on Non Index an the back button Searching on non indexed folders can be painfull. Even more more painfull when you have to retreive the same results again - And it does the search all over again. I did a search I windows explorere that took a few minutes, then browsed another folder to look at something , then hit the back button and it did the search all over again. Cant vista not tell if the file system has been changed and only then repeat a search for these kid of cases? Regards |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | RE: Searches on Non Index an the back button Your best bet is to simply index the entire system, then all of your searches will be much faster. It'll take a while but it's a good investment in your time if you don't plan on wiping the partition any time soon. "blueey" wrote: > Searching on non indexed folders can be painfull. Even more more painfull > when you have to retreive the same results again - And it does the search all > over again. > > I did a search I windows explorere that took a few minutes, then browsed > another folder to look at something , then hit the back button and it did the > search all over again. Cant vista not tell if the file system has been > changed and only then repeat a search for these kid of cases? > > Regards |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | RE: Searches on Non Index an the back button Thanks , but i have another question though, If i do that , index the whole system, then whats the point of indexing? I assumed indexing was meant to speed up searches on directories that are commonly used to store and get info. So if we have everything indexed - system as well, then would it not be tons of info in the index file and searches going on for a while I'm guessing that you dont mean entire system but only certain folders or am i missing something "Adam" wrote: > Your best bet is to simply index the entire system, then all of your searches > will be much faster. It'll take a while but it's a good investment in your > time if you don't plan on wiping the partition any time soon. > > "blueey" wrote: > > > Searching on non indexed folders can be painfull. Even more more painfull > > when you have to retreive the same results again - And it does the search all > > over again. > > > > I did a search I windows explorere that took a few minutes, then browsed > > another folder to look at something , then hit the back button and it did the > > search all over again. Cant vista not tell if the file system has been > > changed and only then repeat a search for these kid of cases? > > > > Regards |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Searches on Non Index an the back button The index is designed to be very fast for searching - much faster than the non-indexed searches. I have about 250,000 items in my index and searches take only a couple of seconds. Note that there can be some performance overhead building an index of that size in the first place, which is why we don't index the entire hard-drive by default. But if you want fast searches over the whole drive I would recommend trying it out ... Dave Wood "blueey" <blueey@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:EF3A6942-7B04-4B8E-AB37-C77377F05BCE@microsoft.com... > Thanks , but i have another question though, > > If i do that , index the whole system, then whats the point of indexing? > I assumed indexing was meant to speed up searches on directories that are > commonly used to store and get info. > > So if we have everything indexed - system as well, then would it not be > tons > of info in the index file and searches going on for a while > > I'm guessing that you dont mean entire system but only certain folders or > am > i missing something > > "Adam" wrote: > >> Your best bet is to simply index the entire system, then all of your >> searches >> will be much faster. It'll take a while but it's a good investment in >> your >> time if you don't plan on wiping the partition any time soon. >> >> "blueey" wrote: >> >> > Searching on non indexed folders can be painfull. Even more more >> > painfull >> > when you have to retreive the same results again - And it does the >> > search all >> > over again. >> > >> > I did a search I windows explorere that took a few minutes, then >> > browsed >> > another folder to look at something , then hit the back button and it >> > did the >> > search all over again. Cant vista not tell if the file system has been >> > changed and only then repeat a search for these kid of cases? >> > >> > Regards |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Back Button Issue | Network & Sharing | |||
| Windows Experience Index - No Update Button | General Discussion | |||
| back button | Vista General | |||
| Easy Vista Back Button? | Vista General | |||
| Why have a misplaced back button? | Vista General | |||