![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | 'tags' field embedded in metadata 'tags' field embedded in metadata When I first got vista I could not wait to tag my files, it's the best feature of the OS in my opinion. However it was important that the data entered stayed latched in the file, as it mostly does, but I had a horrible feelng that all my hard work might be missplaced as the all important 'tag' field was not present in the visible fields of any file under XP. which doesn't nessesarily mean it wasn't. So I tested the theory by tagging all fields of a .jpg and checking the meatdata on another computer from an internet cafe, it was XP (nobody has vista yet), but could not see the tag field, so until i test it on another vista machine I am still not 100% sure and really would like to clarify the situation: Does the 'tag' field data reside within the file or on a database in vista? Also I heard it was possible to get the rating system to tag inside files rather than the vista d/b, is this true and should Microsoft really be using anything but the metadata within a file without making it clear?! Many thanks, Samuel |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: 'tags' field embedded in metadata Samuel This is a little late, I hope your still monitoring this group. If not, hope this helps someone else. Here is an excerpt from an article on the Microsoft Photography Blog. <quote> In the past, you may have used third-party image management applications that allowed you to add tags (or other metadata) to your photos, only to find out later that those tags were locked in a private database that only that application could read. This makes it inconvenient to share your photos (or back them up), since the metadata didn’t travel with the file. In Windows Vista, our goal is “the truth is in the file”. That means that metadata you apply to your photos is part of the photo, and available to any application that knows how to read it. </quote> Microsoft Photography Blog : Metadata and the Windows Vista Photo Gallery: http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/archive/20...16/702780.aspx -- Ronnie Vernon Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User "Samuel" <Samuel@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7E83697C-40EF-4F14-A7F3-38A6E3CEC71A@microsoft.com... > 'tags' field embedded in metadata > > When I first got vista I could not wait to tag my files, it's the best > feature of the OS in my opinion. However it was important that the data > entered stayed latched in the file, as it mostly does, but I had a > horrible > feelng that all my hard work might be missplaced as the all important > 'tag' > field was not present in the visible fields of any file under XP. which > doesn't nessesarily mean it wasn't. > > So I tested the theory by tagging all fields of a .jpg and checking the > meatdata on another computer from an internet cafe, it was XP (nobody has > vista yet), but could not see the tag field, so until i test it on another > vista machine I am still not 100% sure and really would like to clarify > the > situation: > > Does the 'tag' field data reside within the file or on a database in > vista? > > Also I heard it was possible to get the rating system to tag inside files > rather than the vista d/b, is this true and should Microsoft really be > using > anything but the metadata within a file without making it clear?! > > Many thanks, > > Samuel |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: 'tags' field embedded in metadata On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:29:04 -0800, "Ronnie Vernon MVP" >Here is an excerpt from an article on the Microsoft Photography Blog. ><quote> >In the past, you may have used third-party image management applications >that allowed you to add tags (or other metadata) to your photos, only to >find out later that those tags were locked in a private database that only >that application could read. This makes it inconvenient to share your photos >(or back them up), since the metadata didnt travel with the file. In >Windows Vista, our goal is the truth is in the file. That means that >metadata you apply to your photos is part of the photo, and available to any >application that knows how to read it. ></quote> >Microsoft Photography Blog : Metadata and the Windows Vista Photo Gallery: >http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/archive/20...16/702780.aspx Vista64 RTM seems to have a bug within the graphic file metadata, as visible in the relevant picture here: http://cquirke.spaces.live.com/Perso...&_c=PhotoAlbum If you include "/" characters in a tag, only the text to the right of the last "/" is displayed, though the full tag is displayed in the ToolTip for that tag. Stability problems may follow the creation of such tags, when working with tags on other graphic files in the same folder. >--------------- ---- --- -- - - - - Saws are too hard to use. Be easier to use! >--------------- ---- --- -- - - - - |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How to Replace vbcrlf outside html tags in memo field of access database | VB Script | |||
| file's metadata in Windows Vista: "The embedded ICC profile cannot be used because th | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Some tags not being embedded (WPG). | Vista music pictures video | |||
| Windows Vista WILL NOT play embedded Windows Media Player if content DOES NOT have TAGS | Vista General | |||
| 'tags' field embedded in metadata | Vista file management | |||