![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Folder tree indexing. Useful and not resources eater! This is a suggestion: I think it could be very useful to add an option to the index service in Windows Vista that allows the system to index the whole folder tree but not the archives contained in those folders. This way we could jump to any folder in the hard drive just by typing its name in any search box. The only way to do it now is to index the whole drive (folders and archives) which takes too much computer power. By adding an option to just index the folder tree we could fast go to any folder in the hard disk and it would not consume too many hardware resources. I even think the services should scan the whole folder tree by default and then allows the users to manually add desired folders to be fully indexed (subfolders and archives). This would make our lives much easier Thanks a lot. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com...ile_management |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Folder tree indexing. Useful and not resources eater! indexing is done in the background and apparently does snot impact cpu usage to a great degree. only thing I have found is heavy file usage might get impacted. once the initial indexing is done it behaves. mikeyhsd@sport.rr.commikeyhsd@sport.rr.com "efrua" <efrua@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news E6F5C51-F612-4C52-847B-ACFFBBFD578D@microsoft.com...This is a suggestion: I think it could be very useful to add an option to the index service in Windows Vista that allows the system to index the whole folder tree but not the archives contained in those folders. This way we could jump to any folder in the hard drive just by typing its name in any search box. The only way to do it now is to index the whole drive (folders and archives) which takes too much computer power. By adding an option to just index the folder tree we could fast go to any folder in the hard disk and it would not consume too many hardware resources. I even think the services should scan the whole folder tree by default and then allows the users to manually add desired folders to be fully indexed (subfolders and archives). This would make our lives much easier Thanks a lot. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com...ile_management |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Folder tree indexing. Useful and not resources eater! In Windows Vista Help, Microsoft does not recomend you to index the whole drive as search will become slower. "mikeyhsd" wrote: > indexing is done in the background and apparently does snot impact cpu usage to a great degree. only thing I have found is heavy file usage might get impacted. > once the initial indexing is done it behaves. > > mikeyhsd@sport.rr.commikeyhsd@sport.rr.com > > "efrua" <efrua@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news E6F5C51-F612-4C52-847B-ACFFBBFD578D@microsoft.com...> This is a suggestion: > > I think it could be very useful to add an option to the index service in > Windows Vista that allows the system to index the whole folder tree but not > the archives contained in those folders. This way we could jump to any folder > in the hard drive just by typing its name in any search box. > The only way to do it now is to index the whole drive (folders and archives) > which takes too much computer power. > By adding an option to just index the folder tree we could fast go to any > folder in the hard disk and it would not consume too many hardware resources. > > I even think the services should scan the whole folder tree by default and > then allows the users to manually add desired folders to be fully indexed > (subfolders and archives). > This would make our lives much easier > > Thanks a lot. > > > ---------------- > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then > click "I Agree" in the message pane. > > http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com...ile_management |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Windows Explorer: folder shortcut, can't navigate up the folder tree | Vista General | |||
| Report changes in folder tree | PowerShell | |||
| Outlook Folder tree | PowerShell | |||
| indexing network shared resources | Vista file management | |||
| indexing network shared resources | Vista networking & sharing | |||